More! I need more of this!

  • Septimaeus@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    She’s always been such an action hero. Even now as the conservatives are emboldened. Tell me who’s gonna lead the god damn revolution.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      By the looks of it, her being imprisoned is what might America stand up, or not. Most of Republicans are racist pieces of shit with no moral compass or compassion to the extent that it is guaranteed they all go tell hell if they are Christians for eternity, all to suck an orange mans cock for a few years. Talk about people hurt by being closeted.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 minutes ago

        Only thing they we’ll make Americans stand up is if they turned off the internet. But then they’d probably just go to tv again.

      • quetzaldilla@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Bernie and AOC are the only two representatives that have ever gotten me so fired up that I’m signing up for phone banking & door knocking even though that’s like the last fucking thing I wanna do in my free time.

        I am even hate calling my state representatives and telling them to just do what AOC says because clearly she’s got the biggest balls in the room and actually understands what her job is-- fighting for the people she represents, not corporate interests.

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          I called my representative a few years back and his office said you should call your representative because they weren’t it. That was Florida. The day Rubio and Voldemort get to meet the working class, will be a day their family says, oh shit, that’s what I thought

  • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Arresting AOC would be the biggest mistake the MAGA Nazis could make. It would virtually guarantee that she will be the leader in post-MAGA America.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 minutes ago

      Post-MAGA America is what they’re trying to prevent through their fascist attacks on the rule of law and the judiciary.

      Every day I’m more convinced that those of us on the left needs to stock up before they start adding registered Democrats to the NICS database to keep us from buying weapons.

  • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    234
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Please stay safe, AOC

    Homan, when asked about Evers’ guidance outside the White House on Thursday, answered, “Wait ’til you see what’s coming.”

    These absolute fucking ghouls. Homan needs to be put against the fucking wall.

    • JuBe@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Mod here: We’ve received several reports from this comment thread. If I had the power to lock just this thread, I would because I can see how this conversation has some seeds for productive discourse, but that doesn’t seem to be the direction that things are headed toward right now.

      I would encourage people to reread what each other has said, and rather than immediately thinking of a rebuttal, read it a second or third time until you can interpret what the other person said a different way than you initially read it.

    • JuBe@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Mod here: We’ve received several reports from this comment thread. If I had the power to lock just this thread, I would because I can see how this conversation has some seeds for productive discourse, but that doesn’t seem to be the direction that things are headed toward right now.

      I would encourage people to reread what each other has said, and rather than immediately thinking of a rebuttal, read it a second or third time until you can interpret what the other person said a different way than you initially read it.

      • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        28 minutes ago

        this conversation has some seeds for productive discourse, but that doesn’t seem to be the direction that things are headed toward right now.

        Why is some unproductive discourse a problem? Why is it so severe that a (hypothetical) thread lock is needed?

    • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      69
      ·
      1 day ago

      What’s more, Pam Bondi is probably the one orchestrating and advising on political prosecutions that are almost certainly implied by “what’s coming.”

      But I really hope my other intuition is correct and they have not yet fully staffed the DOJ with fascist sycophants. I am hoping there are enough decent people that they have been and will derail the worst of it, at least in the short term.

      • SarcasticMan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        23 hours ago

        I feel like the recession and threat of joblessness will sway a lot of those decent people to “just doing my job” their way into being okay with it.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      48
      ·
      1 day ago

      Please stay safe, AOC

      No, don’t. The opposition playing it safe is how the fascists are winning.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          49
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          Yes, I know what you meant. But the reality is, defeating fascism is not a safe thing to do. If we all stick with the mentality of being safe, we will lose our rights forever.

          Edit: I guess the downvotes I’m getting just go to show how many of us are fascists and/or cowards.

          Edit 2: keep downvoting without replying to refute my point, fascist cowards. You’re only proving me right with every click. You have no fucking rebuttal and you know it.

          • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            30
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            17 hours ago

            You’re getting downvoted for being a dick. Stop being a dick and maybe people will listen to you. You can be correct and have a counterproductive attitude. Especially knowing that Lemmy is largely filled with people who align with you.

            • grue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              30
              ·
              16 hours ago

              Nope, I was getting downvoted before that. Try again.

              The real reason is that people don’t want to hear what a dire situation we’re actually in. They want to delude themselves into thinking that “safe” politics as usual is capable of solving the problems we’re faced with to day, but it isn’t. So they shoot the messenger.

              • quetzaldilla@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                14
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                11 hours ago

                Yeah, because you were being a dick on your first comment.

                Just say “my bad” and be more thoughtful going forward, that’s all it takes.

                • grue@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  16
                  ·
                  10 hours ago

                  TIL not wanting to discourage standing up to fascism makes me a “dick.”

                  🙄

              • orgrinrt@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                10 hours ago

                You can tell yourself what you want, but I agree with your view, and still had to downvote just to reduce the toxicity hogging space from up top. I use the votes as signal boosters / signal dampeners. Lower voted, for most people, end up in the bottom, where most don’t reach them.

                Some people don’t want to hear it, because they know it by heart already. Some because it’s not productive and only serves to lower morale. Some, because that’s just defeatist and/or escalatory. Whatever the reason, I’m certain most people do not need to hear that shit. What purpose would it even serve? Things are not as dire as that and you know it too, you are just being sensational for whatever reason you’ve conjured yourself. I even agree that things have to hurt before meaningful action starts to happen at a meaningful level, but hoping specifically someone to get hurt and/or not stay safe is just you being a prick. Nobody needs to be exposed to that.

                • grue@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 hours ago

                  hoping specifically someone to get hurt

                  What the fuck is wrong with you?! That is not even slightly what I said and you fucking know it. Telling hateful lies like that is 10000% more “prick” behavior than anything I did!

                  There’s a big fucking difference between hoping that somebody will not listen to cowardly advice, and hoping they get hurt. I shouldn’t have to explain that to the entire fucking thread, but I’m apparently surrounded by idiots.

          • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            16 hours ago

            Yes, I know what you meant. But the reality is, defeating fascism is not a safe thing to do. If we all stick with the mentality of being safe, we will lose our rights forever.

            Edit: I guess the downvotes I’m getting just go to show how many of us are fascists and/or cowards.

            Edit 2: keep downvoting without replying to refute my point, fascist cowards. You’re only proving me right with every click. You have no fucking rebuttal and you know it.

            Yeah, no. That’s not a choice you get to make for AOC.

            It’s not even a choice you get to make for anyone but yourself.

            I’ll put it another way, perhaps more clearly:

            If you volunteer your own safety and even your life in the cause of defending others from evil, you’re a hero. I mean that sincerely.

            But when you freely volunteer someone else’s safety and even their own life for a cause that you have determined they should suffer and die for, no matter how noble or ethical, you are just another arrogant prick who has strayed SO far from your own lane that you’ve become blind to your own anti-fascist cause, even the moral lines you 100% believe you’re defending.

            Add to this the fact that AOC is female, and how many men believe women are disposable and even interchangeable, and that just adds a whole 'nother level of self-engaged fuckery to your outburst.

            In case all this isn’t clear enough for you, FASCISTS are the ones who gleefully sacrifice others to their cause and blithely determine them all to be sacrifices they’re willing to make on the behalf of the majority. Maybe go back and think about what you’re really advocating before you adopt the exact same tactics you decry in others to make it happen.

            In the meantime you richly deserve every downvote you get.

            EDITED TO ADD ORIGINAL QUOTE:

            Please stay safe, AOC

            No, don’t. The opposition playing it safe is how the fascists are winning.

            • grue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              18
              ·
              edit-2
              16 hours ago

              Yeah, no. That’s not a choice you get to make for AOC.

              And I’m not!

              But @prole over there thinks it’s somehow a good thing to encourage her to stop. Since when is he entitled to tell her to second-guess the decision she already made?

              It’s ironic that he’s the one who committed the offense you think was so heinous – trying to tell AOC what to do – but you’re piling on me instead for pushing back on it.

              But when you freely volunteer someone else’s safety

              Fuck off and quit lying about what I said.

              Add to this the fact that AOC is female, and how many men believe women are disposable and even interchangeable, and that just adds a whole 'nother level of self-engaged fuckery to your outburst.

              Now you reveal your own dishonesty and bad faith, pulling implications of sexism out of thin fucking air. You should be ashamed of yourself. Apologize. Now.

              • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                16 hours ago

                Yeah, that’s why I quoted you in full.

                I don’t have a problem with remembering what you wrote. You do.

                pulling implications of sexism out of thin fucking air.

                Read it again carefully . . . but thank you for confirming the accuracy. Not everyone who genuinely supports the rights of women is a woman, lol.

                You should be ashamed of yourself. Apologize. Now.

                BWAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                • grue@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  14
                  ·
                  16 hours ago

                  Yeah, that’s why I quoted you in full.

                  I don’t have a problem with remembering what you wrote. You do.

                  First of all, no you fucking didn’t. You quoted my second comment, but not the first (let alone the context I was replying to). Quit lying.

                  Second, exactly where the fuck in…

                  Yes, I know what you meant. But the reality is, defeating fascism is not a safe thing to do. If we all stick with the mentality of being safe, we will lose our rights forever.

                  …did I demand or “volunteer” anything from AOC? Point it out!

                  Oh that’s right, you can’t because I said no such thing and you fucking know it.

                  Read it again carefully . . . but thank you for confirming the accuracy.

                  You should read it again, because you didn’t confirm a goddamn thing.

                  Not everyone who genuinely supports the rights of women is a woman, lol.

                  No shit, Sherlock – literally nobody here but you ever implied otherwise. Maybe you’re the sexist who just made that major discovery for yourself, LOL!

                  Bottom line is, you have some real “lack of reading comprehension” and “making bad-faith baseless accusation” problems.

            • grue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Okay then, educate me. Tell me exactly which part of what I wrote wasn’t correct. Be specific, please – after all, “I’m uneducated.”

  • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    1 day ago

    I love her gumption, but I really fear she’s underestimating her opposition. They’ve already shown they care nothing about the rule of law, so counting on that to “protect” you is a losing bet in the long term.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 minutes ago

      It’s terrible, but what we need is the final layer of the mask to come of ASAP. Right now the US population is a slowly-boiling frog, and to get regular people to act we may need the heat to get turned up to 11.

    • bean@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I think she’s doing what’s right and good, and there’s not a lot of that going around right now. I stand for and with her. Bring it if they want to mess with her.

    • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      183
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well, she can either cower in fear and comply in advance, or fight to the limits of what she can do. They are coming for her either way.

      I think she is what the Democrats should be. She is doing her job. TBH electing her president would restore a lot of the public image Trump lost the US.

      • Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        They are coming for her either way.

        This is the most important lesson for everyone. There is no safety in complacency. There is no peace after appeasement.

        You fight today, or you die tomorrow. They might not come for you first, but they will come for you. By the time they do, who will be left to speak out?

        • habitualcynic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          14 hours ago

          This is absolutely the lesson we all need to learn. It is always true, in history, life, and art with such ghouls:

          That doesn’t mean we can’t delay him. And his name is Voldemort, Filius. You might as well use it, he’s going to try and kill you either way. -Prof McGonagall

      • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        16 hours ago

        electing her president would restore a lot of the public image Trump lost the US.

        i think this is not true… a large portion of what the US has in reputation was stability: trump as proved that the systems in place on the US can be bent and abused in ways nobody thought possible… the only way to fix that is systemic change

        4 years of AOC won’t change that the same thing can happen again at the end of her term

        • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          16 hours ago

          I’m not saying it would restore all of it, or even most of it, but being a country that can also elect an AOC would restore hope that the US is not beyond redemption.

      • Blum0108@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        42
        ·
        1 day ago

        We need politicians to push back on the fascists. If they go after AOC too aggressively it will make her a martyr to the cause and give the rest of us someone to aspire to.

        If the limp Democratic opposition continues to do nothing, and we will all feel abandoned to the Red-hats, it only gives trump more power.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          If the limp Democratic opposition continues to do nothing, and we will all feel abandoned to the Red-hats, it only gives trump more power.

          Don’t threaten them with a good time.

    • obvs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      No.

      She understands the risks, and she’s willing to die and be a martyr if that’s what’s necessary.

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        22 hours ago

        We shouldn’t be talking like this regardless. Don’t normalize any ideas they might have. If you make what’s next expected, they’re more likely to do it and more likely to get away with it.

        • bean@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          You didn’t read the article. Paraphrasing but:

          “Use it or lose it. We’re gonna use it”

        • SabinStargem
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I think the point is to expect blood to be spilled, and to prepare for when that happens. That means giving AOC bodyguards, access to a friendly National Guard, food testers, ect. Trump will try to kill her, we should use all measures to safeguard AOC’s life. Acknowledging the reality of her possible death is the first step to preventing that.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      I love her gumption, but I really fear she’s underestimating her opposition. They’ve already shown they care nothing about the rule of law, so counting on that to “protect” you is a losing bet in the long term.

      I love how difficult it is to determine which party is her opposition.

  • daepicgamerbro69@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    y’all gonna have to give me a ‘blunt free speech reminder’ after I go non-verbal when I finish smoking that shit.

    • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think people think you’re trivializing her opposition, but honestly, derisive comedy is one of the only ways to truly undermine fascism. Fearing them may be wise after they are established, but it does only make them stronger.

      Also, anyone not watching the new Beavis & Butthead series is missing out, it’s really good.

    • orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I am the great Cornholio!

      (I got it, even if goobers thought you were insinuating she she flash her chest.)

      • Nougat@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 day ago

        When I saw all the downvotes, I suddenly realized that Beavis and Butthead are “for old people” now.

        • Septimaeus@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          I mean, inappropriate comments are ever-present when this politician has the spotlight, from the very beginning of her career. On first read I thought this was just another, and someone’s opinion re: AOC tells you a lot about them as a person. The mass downvotes on comments in this thread are a clue, for example. Some people have a curiously strong urge to put her in “her place.”

  • Maeve@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    Homan, when asked about Evers’ guidance outside the White House on Thursday, answered, “Wait ’til you see what’s coming.”

    🧐

  • blakenong@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    It’s gonna be GreenE, MTG vs AOC in ‘28

    (Assuming there will be an election)

    Edit: GreenE

    • aramova@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Oh? This you? Portuguese twat who’s never been to the US thinks AOC is a Zionist?

      MF sit the fuck back down and learn how to operate a power grid.

      • o_arguido@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        59 minutes ago

        She’s been seen many times supporting Israel.

        You’re lack education and manners.

    • carlossurf@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Lol aoc is too good for americans, shes a smart person who actually worked to get where she is. No wonder those idiots dont like her

      • Match!!@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        15 hours ago

        well unfortunately @o_arguido@lemmy.world is the sole world authority on who is or is not a zionist so unfortunately if o_arguido said she’s a zionist then well nobody can countermand the zion-lord sorrryyy

    • Wilco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I am so sick of people basing their entire political opinion on what happens in the middle east. News Flash: Many people dont understand what is even happenning. Most of us don’t care.

      • o_arguido@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        51 minutes ago

        That’s why most of the world despise Americans. Keep it up. Fucking murderers. It’s your bombs you fucking idiot

    • LePoisson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      And here we see a sighting of one nature’s truly disgusting creatures.

      The internet troll.

    • GladiusB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      16 hours ago

      What the hell are you on about? Zionist? Use English. Ain’t no one knows what the fuck that means unless you are some neck bearded troll.

    • habitualcynic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Is congresswoman

      Is subject of article

      Is one of the best known democrats

      A nobody says she should leave the party to be taken seriously

      lol okay. And I’m a nobody too, that’s why I have a Lemmy account

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      How does that help anyone? That would just be performative

      The Democratic party is right there, and it stands for nothing. It has all the infrastructure set up already. So let’s take it.

      Let’s tea party the Democratic party and force them left, kicking and screaming. Let’s build a large enough faction of actual progressives and leftists that Democrats are forced to come to the table. We flip red seats and take vacant ones. Then we primary incumbent Democrats who don’t get with the game plan

      That’s what the whole fighting oligarchy tour is about

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        22 hours ago

        The Democratic party is right there, and it stands for nothing.

        That’d be nice, but no. The Democratic Party stands for keeping leftists out of power and, if possible, keeping neoliberals in power. It’s a shit platform, but it’s there and it means they’ll fight you tooth and nail (or simply kick you out, as they’re trying to do to David Hogg) if you try to bring even center-left politics to the party.

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Oh, I’m certain they’ll fight, but I’m not talking about changing the party. I’m talking about taking their base to take their seats

          I’m talking about a hostile takeover, we make a big enough faction and we can take the party, along with the infrastructure and less involved voters

          Why do you think they’re trying to kick out Higgs? It’s not because they think he’s more dangerous as an independent

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            I’m talking about a hostile takeover, we make a big enough faction and we can take the party, along with the infrastructure and less involved voters

            That’d be nice, but my point is that the party will fight you tooth and nail if you try to do that, and if you choose to work within the party they’ll have a lot more leverage over you via party bylaws, appeals to party unity, etc, and they’ll use that leverage to, for example, dilute your political program and drive a rift between your base and leadership and between more and less dedicated members of the movement. These aren’t trivial concerns; handled improperly (or maybe even if handled properly) they could very well spell the end of your attempted takeover.

            Why do you think they’re trying to kick out Higgs? It’s not because they think he’s more dangerous as an independent

            Because he has a high-ranking office within the party and doesn’t have wide national appeal. Also note that Hoggs isn’t a leftist; he’s a liberal who simply wants Democrat gerontocrats gone. He’s running a completely different path from the one we’re talking about here, and still there’s a good chance he gets kicked out and proves my point that the DNC won’t tolerate change from within.

    • MedicsOfAnarchy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think I’d rather she stay. We all wish there were an alternative, but historically third parties have not done well. Easier to get her in as the head of the thing and clean it up that way.

      • Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        1 day ago

        If we could pass Ranked Choice voting, those third and more parties could actually do something. In neighboring Idaho, there were signs trying to prevent RCV on the grounds that it was “confusing”. Propaganda gonna propaganda.

          • Unruffled [they/them]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Unfortunately the Democratic establishment is against ranked choice voting just as much as the Republicans, because it would challenge the two party system.

          • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            Alaska and Maine have managed to get it so I think there’s still hope on that front so long as we continue to have free and fair elections…and that law doesn’t pass/is struck down.

            Most Dems and independents would support RCV because it increases their chances of continued power.

            • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 day ago

              There has been a lot of disinformation out there about RCV so you can’t even count on support from those who would benefit if they fall for the propaganda. It is definitely an uphill battle.

        • tburkhol@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Remember that half of Americans are dumb enough to vote for Trump. A lot of the other half are also just voting for their favorite letter, without any thought of who’s holding it. Even with RCV, there’s an enormous amount of work to convince people who’ve been voting for their favorite letter for decades, who’ve been told for decades that politicians are all the same, to even pay enough attention to realize there’s another option.

          RCV would be a start, but the start of a similarly decades-long process. IMO, it would be easier and faster to reform Dems from within. Recruit properly progressive candidates to primary the tired, old corporate Dems, inspire some of our younger non-voters, and change the party direction. Still take a few election cycles, but you’d keep the people who just vote for their favorite letter.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Easier to get her in as the head of the thing and clean it up that way.

        Uh… What makes you think that’s ever going to happen?

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            Why? It’s longer and less obvious than “establish party now run for president tomorrow,” but with a progressive leftwing third party a clear path to success exists. Now technically one also exists within the Democratic Party, but to take that path you’d need to antagonize the old guard so much that you might as well not be a party member at all, and they’ll still demand ideological or practical compromises to keep you in the party. This will lose you legitimacy with your base in the same way many progressives are souring on AOC, either significantly curtailing the effort or destroying it entirely. The problem with working within the party is simple: You’ll never get anything done by appeasing neoliberals.

            • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              17 hours ago

              to take that path you’d need to antagonize the old guard so much that you might as well not be a party member at all, and they’ll still demand ideological or practical compromises to keep you in the party

              You have to do this regardless. You cannot have a viable third party without pulling a majority of Democratic voters away from the existing party. There simply isn’t enough votes to beat the GOP by starting a new progressive only party. And if you think you’re gonna pull conservative voters, hello Kamala Harris’ campaign manager.

              We have a greater advantage in the primaries than we do during the general election, but my fellow progressives just refuse to fucking show up. Bernie absolutely could have won ,even with the DNC putting their thumb on the scale. You can say it’s rigged against us, but the numbers don’t lie, progressive voters haven’t shown up to vote and it only benefits the GOP.

              • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                13 hours ago

                You have to do this regardless.

                Of course, but my point is that if they’re gonna hate your guts and sabotage you anyway, you might as well make sure you have a free hand to take them on rather than pointlessly try to appease them. This way you give them less leverage over you, or in other words you don’t give them consent to sabotage you to their heart’s content. Of course they can still try, but for example tools like party bylaws and appeals to party unity cease to mean shit. This is crucial because while neoliberals like to play dumb, they’re not dumb; when they come to wreck your movement they’re going to go for the jugular. See for example how AOC lost the Democratic Socialists of America’s endorsement by compromising on Israel and how the DNC is trying to kick David Hoggs out of the party. The way I see it is that while there are a few paths for a progressive group trying to take over/cannibalize the Democratic Party, all of them are mutually exclusive with compromise with neoliberals.

                Bernie absolutely could have won ,even with the DNC putting their thumb on the scale. You can say it’s rigged against us, but the numbers don’t lie, progressive voters haven’t shown up to vote and it only benefits the GOP.

                Sounds about right but can you provide those numbers?

            • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              Establishing a party is very hard, in a country as big as the US it takes decades.

              On the other hand, the political establishment will push back against a third party outside the Democratic Party just as much as inside. I honestly don’t know what’s the right path.

    • 9point6@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      America has FPTP—she loses any practical chance of influence if she does that. Unless you vote for one of the main two parties, you create the same outcome as if you voted for the party you like least.

      The better bet is to push her up to the top of the party and drag it kicking and screaming leftward. Then frankly, start pushing for voting reform to fix this problem

      • EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        There is no reforming a right wing party or pushing politicians left. The only influence in DC is money, they don’t give a flying fuck what we think

        • 9point6@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          So do what AOC did and get involved in changing it then? It’s certainly more left with her in it than not—imagine if half the party was made up with people with more left wing views. I do not understand why so many of you guys are so inert on this.

          The alternative is revolution, and given that involves personal sacrifice in the most hyper-individualist country on the planet, you’re going to have an uphill struggle with getting enough people together to even make the news.

          One option is a practical thing you can actually do, without having to wait for anyone else, to start on a path of improving things to align with your views. The other is basically waiting and hoping things eventually get so bad it short-circuits the capitalist propaganda that’s been shoved down every American’s throat since they could breathe. Then that you can get enough people together for a violent revolution at all, let alone enough for one to be successful.

          Frankly, if you’re waiting anyway, you may as well get involved in the thing you can do today. Even if at the very least just to get voting reform done—then you can at least vote for a third party and benefit from that vote, could even be a vanguard party!

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            24 hours ago

            So do what AOC did and get involved in changing it then?

            The party is still republican-lite, but now it’s your fault for not being involved enough.

            • EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              20 hours ago

              Chumming up to the Cheney’s isn’t Republican lite. That’s just a slip away from Trump.

    • crusa187@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      agreed, the Dems are beyond redemption. Hard to stomach all the replies here, implication being that after enduring 4 more years of Trump we’re faced with another neoliberal smiley gladhand who will say some of the right things but work only to maintain the status quo and corporate hegemony. But alas, we can’t have meaningful change until people come around to the reality of what the Dems and Repugs have been doing since the 1970s.

      Wake up you fucking jackasses, Dems are not going to save you.