Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful youāll near-instantly regret.
Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.
If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutānāpaste it into its own post ā thereās no quota for posting and the bar really isnāt that high.
The post Xitter web has spawned soo many āesotericā right wing freaks, but thereās no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iām talking redscare-ish, reality challenged āculture criticsā who write about everything but understand nothing. Iām talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyāre inescapable at this point, yet I donāt see them mocked (as much as they should be)
Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnāt be surgeons because they didnāt believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canāt escape them, I would love to sneer at them.
My local authorities insist that my kids are safe after this school shooting due to the gun detection AI that failed to detect gun used in the school shooting.
https://old.reddit.com/r/nashville/comments/1ik36m6/antioch_high_teachers_speak_out_demand/
A long time ago when the whole āshould we cctv everythingā idea was new and controversial I recall an interview or something with a london police chief, at the time the most cctved city. He admitted that cctv didnt help them stop crime or catch more criminals. He still wanted more cctv though. I think about that every now and then when there is another āour surveillance tech actually does not work but we want more of itā story
one of the most annoying things about writing for a US audience is theyāre fucking illiterate and alluding to books confuses them
wanna grab editors by the throat and go āJUST WHAT THE FUCK WERE YOU PEOPLE EVEN DOING IN HIGH SCHOOLā
actual example from today: āwho the hell is Fagin never heard of himā
Fagin, of course, the cocreator of Steely Danā¦ right?
yes thatās the guy does nobody remember The Nightfly
So cards on the table here, Iāve never actually read Oliver Twist. But even neo-google is able to point me at enough useful details to get enough of a gist to follow it.
And thatās assuming you donāt pick it up from Wishbone, the animated talking dogs version , or the muppets parody that Iām sure exists somewhere.
I never read it but somehow absorbed bits from the ambient culture. Might have watched a version at some point.
Age may be part of it. Iām 53. Perhaps Oliver Twist stuff was more visible in US culture in the 70s and 80s than it was later.
The bleakest lol. Your editor said that?
in this case it was some dickhead, but Iāve had this shit from editors too
Reading books in US high school was an exercise in frustration. There werenāt many books assigned, and not a lot of them vibed with me. Most of my classmates did the minimum reading they could get away with (and this was before cellphones were everywhere).
Also I once read through the entirety of the Lord of the Flies before the first quiz on it and so got a quiz answer wrong because I got mixed up due to remembering stuff that happened later in the book which Iām still bitter about.
Our AP English teacher marked down everyone in our class for failing to identify a quote that wasnāt in the translation of LāEtranger that we all read. She refused to give our points back even after I brought a copy of the French original and showed that the translation in our edition was correct when hers was not.
Imagine being afraid of allusions to classic literature in your own native language.
Itās fine to miss a reference. I do it all the time and make my friends do the same. Not getting a reference is not a punishment to you, itās a bonus to those who do get it.
thatās what got me: this guy was pissed off someone referenced Fagin at all, the crime of making the bozo feel uncomfortable at missing something by not reading
Slate says: āFor the Love of God, Stop Profiling This Couple!ā
The Collinses are ineffective, abusive industry plants from Peter Thielās extended circle. They know theyāre entirely media creations. They play off that fact to ensure that journalists never follow up on how many initiatives theyāve started and abandoned, neglect to interrogate their contradictory stances on issues like abortion and ārace science,ā and even seem to accept that theyāre openly being taken for a ride by these dorks. Yet in spite of it all, no one listens to their podcast, they donāt really have much of a following, and their specific appeal is concentrated to a few far-right circuits.
In the new Washington Post profile, Malcolm implies that he āengineered the sceneā because āhe knew smacking his kid would draw attention, help the article go viral and get their message out.ā
How does beating your kid for clicks make anything better!? You still beat your two year old kid!
i still canāt get over how they look
like why the fuck would you wear glasses like those
was there even a point in time where this was fashionableglasses are a fine kink! i guess those ones are a specialist taste
West Coast of USA, late 2000s to early 2010s, yes, the thick squared dark eyeglass frames were popular. Every time I see photos of these folks, Iām reminded of a couple people I know IRL as well as folks I know professionally who still prefer the thicker frames. Personally, Iāve always needed a very heavy prescription, and so Iāve always looked for the thinnest frames, but it really was a trend a decade ago.
Dear acausal robot God, that was cathartic. Refreshing to see a mainstream journalist see through techbro weirdo uwu smol bean antics for what they are, especially after so many credulous puff pieces.
This includes the Guardian (twice), the Wall Street Journal, the Philadelphia Inquirer, CBC News, Business Insider, Bloomberg, and Dallas Magazine, among many, many others. My industry peers very clearly want me to know about these peopleāa lot about them!
I knew that a couple of outlets had done profiles of them lately, but I didnāt realize they were attention whoring this hard. Maybe their thing isnāt a breeding kink after all, but exhibitionism.
I also didnāt know about the child abuse, though I could have seen it coming without subjecting myself to two Grauniad bits on these fuckers1.
And then thereās the slap. The most notable aspect of the Guardianās May 2024 profileāwhich, again, profiled them twice in the same yearāwas a moment when Malcolm slaps his son in the face, in public, after the then-2-year-old accidentally bumped into a table, leaving the boy āwhimpering.ā To her credit, reporter Jenny Kleeman didnāt let this go, forcing the couple to defend this punishment.
1: Donāt even know if āfuckerā is appropriate here given these bougie failchildren are apparently opting for IVF for the actual baby making part.
I think the first Guardian article had some value, just because the reporter hung around the Collinses long enough that they indicted themselves through their own actions and words. Whether that outweighs giving two eugenicists a platform to tell people about their beliefs is difficult to judge.
Iirc, whatshisface defended himself by claiming that black parents were more likely to hit their kids, therefore it was racist to criticise him for doing so
Headline photo is actually a jump-scare
Fun fact, I looked at that article. And my monitor exploded. No joke. I was in sudden darkness, and the mains were turned off. Pc survived thankfully, and I have a secondary monitor but lol wtf. (I need to go to bed).
my bad, I was working on the awful.systems psychic energy collector and it must have backlashed
Damn you! Still a monitor from 2008, it had a good run.
Maybe your monitor was trying to protect you
Rest of my electronics have survived so very likely. Guess it got confused as Iām also looking for new glasses and went "dont pick one of those*
Today in āpropaganda I didnāt think I needed to worry aboutā - Cybertruck kids books!
And another one! This one actually has a good title in āThe Ugly Trucklingā and Iām legitimately mad as the father of a truck-obsessed child that itās wasted here.
I have some songs for your truck obsessed child (possibly NSFW)
early hire atā¦ roblox
I think youāll find Guangdong did a lot of the actual building.
According to some roblox wiki also the richest person (in roblox). So wonder if it is libertarian goes monarchist.
Pivot to AI: Amy is retiring! Probably! yes my cowriter has heard the call of revolution and will be having full and frank debates in the marketplace of ideas. WIth sweet reason.
Send her my thanks for her service! o7
So the far right people are already infighting each other with disinformation. Now they are accusing others of being part of the USAID thing. See this tweet by I,hypocrite (lporiginalg) (Note the guy is a bad guy (an anti-Semite for example), so this is fasc on fasc action).
"So let me get this straightā¦
Vaush
Aella
Richard Hanania
James Lindsay
Were all funded by USAID? WHO ELSE?
<community note pointing out this isnāt true>"
They are coming for you Aella, hope you have an exit strategy (Just saying: Publicly burning bridges, and dropping the chatlogs of others would create a lot of goodwill on the anti-fascist side, and would be a good first step in rebuilding trust with some people (even if for a lot this cannot be regained)).
Perhaps using a lot of lying shitheads to get political clout is a bad idea, as even when you are in power, they will not stop lying (and being shitheads).
Evergreen reaction image.
Basically this is the usual battle between the literal neo-nazi antisemites and the more mainstream fascists whoāve pivoted from virulent antisemitism to anti-muslim racism and support for Israel (but that wonāt stop them from having a go at the (((globalists))) every other day). Fun for all.
Yeah very much whoever wins we lose. We should just build a large trebuchet and fire them all into the sun. But sadly the gov does nothing.
The gov is currently just another faction of the fash infighting.
Thankfully im not American. Checks Dutch news ow fuck our fasc is also infighting
Yeah, thankfully little happening here, too. Checks Finnish news oh, apparently a cop guarding the presidentās house killed himself in November. Also some expertās āthis kind of Muskian coup could not happen here because that would be illegalā shirt is raising questions already answered by his shirt.
Well here thankfully the fight is over (today it was, tomorrow it will be something else, no wait our fasc doesnāt work the weekends, monday it will be) the crisis of not having enough prison cells, which they wanted to fix by letting people with sentences of less than a year out 2 weeks earlier. Which caused a rift between the party āmemberā(*) who wanted to do it and the fuhrer Wilders (whos negative reaction on this was published via twitter of course).
*: Technically Wilders party has only one member, Wilders.
I distinctly recall a lot of people a few years ago parroting some variation of āwell I donāt know about Bitcoin specifically, but blockchain itself is probably going to be important and even revolutionary as a technologyā and sometimesI wish Iād collected receipts to say āI told you itās notā.
Here we are, year of Nakamoto 17 and the full list of use cases for blockchains is:
- Speculative trading of toy currencies made up by private nobodies
- Paying through the nose to execute arbitrary code on SETI@Homeās evil cousin
- Speculative trading of arbitrary blobs of bytes made up by private nobodies
And no, Git is not a fucking blockchain. Much like the New York City Subway is not the fucking Loop.
year of Nakamoto 17
so what youāre saying is, next year a whole lot of these guys are suddenly going to lose interest
you forgot sanctions evasion, volunteering as a liquidity pool for iranian laundromat, and north korean ransomware
Ok, maybe cryptocurrencies made those a little bit easier than doing the same thing with MMO money or having to mail physical goods. I can even go out on a limb and credit the blockchain itself for them, even though the design kind of makes transactions inherently more traceable than some possible aleternatives do.
The rise of ransomware and cryptocurrencies sadly are linked.
I know, thatās why Iām giving them this one.
Sorry, misread your tone.
No worries. I do agree ransomware industry might not have taken off or at least might have taken off a lot slower if the victims had to make a gold mule video game character or mail cash or precious metals through seedy relay addresses to pay the ransom. So Iāll habe to credit cryptocurrency, if not necessarily blockchain per se, for that dubious achievement.
Yeah good point on the blockchain tech split vs actual cryptocurrencies. Esp considering the stories some of the exchanges basically did away with the blockchain for internal trades.
there are always swiss banks and abu dhabi charities
There are days where I think that desktop Linux usability has gotten so good, it has come such a long way since I started using it in the late 90s, and that now itās really good. And then there are days like today, where I just install some system updates, reboot, and suddenly Iām greeted with:
Note: I have absolutely no idea what āFcitxā even is. Or why and how itās launched, or whether Iām actually using it or not. Or what this notification is trying to tell me exactly, and whether it is desirable for me to āimprove the experienceā with it. Or how the latest updates caused this. It appears that it has something to do with keyboard input, I guess. I assume that I could find out more by crawling the web. But honestly, Iām just too fucking exhausted to even bother figuring it out. I donāt even want to know how much lifetime Iāve already spent chasing Linux problems like that.
Fcitx is an input method editor used to type different languages, especially those that need to be composed from context (Chinese, Japanese, Thai, etc.) I believe it comes preinstalled with KDE (at least in kde-full it does, unsure about the smaller packages), but it should be totally safe to remove if you donāt need this functionality.
Thanks! I uninstalled it and things appear to work normally.
I dunno, still not as bad as the last Win10 update I was presented with that wanted to resize the recovery partition and shrink my C drive at the same time. That was the push I needed to switch to my Gentoo install and never look back. I presume that Windows is probably pretty decent about live partition resizing these days, but I donāt know that for sure, and I donāt want to waste time being concerned about it on a system thatās mainly for gaming anyway.
Yep, Iām certainly not claiming that Windows is better at it these daysā¦ (Possibly unpopular opinion: Windows usability peaked with WinXP.)
Rats have reached the āput up stickers to proselytizeā stage of their weird religion
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/SvtKronRNrw9AxXwa/clement-l-s-shortform?commentId=ZifQXkhxo5dJvrL3Q
not sure if this is entirely ignorable as a tactic or if the counter-tactic is to post similar stickers but with references/QR codes to classic shock sites.
I hate LLMs so much. Now, every time I read student writing, I have to wonder if itās ānormal overwroughtā or āLLM bullshit.ā You can make educated guesses, but the reasoning behind this is really no better than what the LLM does with tokens (on top of any internalized biases I have), so of course I donāt say anything (unless there is a guaranteed giveaway, like āas a language modelā).
No one describes their algorithm as āefficiently doing [intermediate step]ā unless youāre describing it to a general, non-technical audience ā what a coincidence ā and yet it keeps appearing in my studentsā writing. Itās exhausting.
Edit: I really canāt overemphasize how exhausting it is. Students will send you a direct message in MS Teams where they obviously used an LLM. We used to get
my algorithm checks if an array is already sorted by going through it one by one and seeing if every element is smaller than the next element
which is non-technical and could use a pass, but is succinct, clear, and correct. Now, we get1
In order to determine if an array is sorted, we must first iterate through the array. In order to iterate through the array, we create a looping variable
iinitialized to0. At each step of the loop, we check ifiis less thann - 1. If so, we then check if the element at indexiis less than or equal to the element at indexi + 1. If not, we outputFalse. Otherwise, we incrementiand repeat. If the loop finishes successfully, we outputTrue.and Iām fucking tired. Like, use your own fucking voice, please! I want to hear your voice in your writing. PLEASE.
1: Made up the example out of whole-cloth because I havenāt determined if there are any LLMs I can use ethically. It gets the point across, but I suspect itās only half the length of what ChatGPT would output.
My sympathies.
Read somewhere that the practice of defending oneās thesis was established because buying a thesis was such an established practice. Scaling that up for every single text is of course utterly impractical.
I had a recent conversation with someone who was convinced that machines learn when they regurgitate text, because āthat is what humans doā. My counterargument was that if regurgitation is learning then every student who crammed, regurgitated and forgot, must have learnt much more than anyone thought. I didnāt get any reply, so I must assume that by reading my reply and creating a version of it in their head they immediately understood the errors of their ways.
I had a recent conversation with someone who was convinced that machines learn when they regurgitate text, because āthat is what humans doā.
But we know the tech behind these models right? They dont change their weights when they produce output right? You could have a discussion if updating the values is learning, but it doesnt even do that right? (Feeding the questions back into the dataset used to train them is a different mechanic)
Thatās true, and thatās one way to approach the topic.
I generally focus on humans being more complex than the caricature we need to be reduced to in order for the argument to appear plausible. Having some humanities training comes in handy because the prompt fans very rarely do.
i got quoted as an ai authority, talking about elonās rational boys https://www.dailydot.com/news/elon-musk-doge-coup-engineer-grant-democracy/
AI alignment is literally a bunch of amateur philosophers telling each other scary stories about The Terminator around a campfire
I love you, David.
If Jason Wilson calls you for a quote, you give him your best.
If only the Supreme Court had as much of a spine as the Romanian Constitutional Court
Law prohibiting driving after consuming substances declared as unconstitutional. Of course, the antidrug agency bypassed the courts and parliament to pass it anyway.
See also: Constitutional Court cancels election result after Russian interference
I donāt know if this is the right place to ask, but a friend from the field is wondering if there are any examples of good AI companies out there? With AI not meaning LLM companies. Thanks!
sounds a bit of a xy question imo, and a good answer of examples would depend on the y part of the question, the whatever it is that (if my guess is right) your friend is actually looking to know/find
āAIā is branding, a marketing thing that a cadaverous swarm of ghouls got behind in the upswing of the slop wave (you can trace this by checking popularity of the term in the months after deepdream), a banner with which to claim to be doing something new, a ānew handleā to use to try anchor anew in the imaginations of many people who were (by normal and natural humanity) not yet aware of all the theft and exploitation. this was not by accident
there are a fair of good machine learning systems and companies out there (and by dint of hype and market forces, some end up sticking the āAIā label on their products, because thatās just how this deeply fucked capitalist market incentivises). as other posters have said, medical technology has seen some good uses, thereās things like recommender[0] and mass-analysis system improvements, and Iāve seen the same in process environments[1]. thereās even a lot of āquiet and usefulā forms of this that have been getting added to many daily use systems and products all around us: reasonably good text extractors as a baseline feature in pdf and image viewers, subject matchers to find pets and friends in photos, that sort of thing. but those donāt get headlines and silly valuation insanity as much of the industry is in the midst of
[0] - not always blanket good, thereās lots of critique possible here
[1] - things like production lines that can use correlative prediction for checking on likely faults
Thanks for the replies, I guess the āgoodā was vague on purpose, to see how people interpret itā¦
This popped up on one of my feeds today and I saved it, canāt remember from where, itās relevant to the above so sharing here: https://oneproject.org/ai-commons/ (AI Commons: nourishing alternatives to Big Tech monoculture).
They talk about AI for good, at some point they mention how the term is sometimes used just for marketing.
There are companies doing ācool-soundingā things with AI like Waymo. āGoodā would require more definition.
The only thing that comes to mind is medical applications, drug research, etc. But that might just be a skewed perspective on my end because I know literally nothing about that industry or how AI technology is deployed there. Iāve just read research has been assisted by those tools and that seems, at least on the surface level, like a good thing.
at long last, we have found genai use case
result: decisive chinese cultural victory
+6 culture generation for each person gooning under a portrait of xi jinping. chinaās borders will expand quickly
ah yes, content from the well-known community mod
Cursid Meier
He who controls the goons controls the universe. No wait that is only in EVE online.
deleted by creator
