

Ah yes the typical workflow for LLM generated changes:
- LLM produces nonsense at the behest of employee A.
- Employee B leaves a bunch of edits and suggestions to hammer it into something thatās sloppy but almost kind of makes sense. A soul-sucking error prone process that takes twice as long as just writing the dang code.
- Code submitted!
- Employee A gets promoted.
Also the fact that this isnāt integrated with tests shows how rushed the implementation was. Not even LLM optimists should want code changes that donāt compile or that break tests.
Hereās a video of a Tesla vehicle taking the saying āmove fast and break thingsā to heart.