

Having now read it (I have regrets), I think itās even worse than you suggested. Heās not trying to argue that women are attracted to dangerous men in order to prevent the danger from happening to them. He assumes that, based on āeveryday experienceā of how he feels when dealing with āhigh-statusā men and then tries to use that as an extension of and evidence for his base-level theory of how the brain does consciousness. (Iām not going to make the obvious joke about alternative reasons why he has the same feeling around certain men that he does around women he finds attractive.) In order to get there he has to assume that culture and learning play no role in what people find attractive, which is just absurd on itās face and renders the whole argument not worth engaging with.
Is this National Design Studio actually part of the federal government, though? Or is this a further collapsing of the distinction between state and enterprise? Because honestly I could totally buy members of this administration looking for ways to use copyright law to go after people who make parodies or otherwise use US iconography without toeing the party line. Iām doing my damnedest not to go full tinfoil hat with this shit, but itās proving so hard.