

Considering this word really applies most to people like Joe Rogan, I find this whole thing pretty ironic.
Considering this word really applies most to people like Joe Rogan, I find this whole thing pretty ironic.
If he’s just going to let them all die from preventable causes, then he shouldn’t be allowed to have any more children. That’s just straight up negligence.
Why would they need to “smuggle” him back into the country? He’s an innocent man, wrongfully incarcerated in a foreign prison. What the fuck is wrong with these assholes?
Just get a tissue sample for the DNA. Bring them back once Capitalism is over.
That process still needs to happen. You can’t just assume what the final outcome is going to be, and just proceed as if it can’t be challenged. That defeats the entire purpose of judicial review.
If there is even the slightest possibility that the order given, is in conflict with the Constitution…then allowing it to proceed at all, is also a violation of the Constitution. Putting that order on pause, until the review process can be completed…all the way up to the Supreme Court if necessary…is the only logical option.
Or do you think it’s fine to keep breaking the law for potentially months, until the Supreme Court can confirm what even the lowest courts were able to determine was illegal?
Why would they give him back? The US is paying them to keep these people. That was the deal. Giving him back means they don’t get paid.
Is it officially considered a “Constitutional crisis” yet? This kind of logic only works on toddlers, when you want to make an excuse about something and you know they lack the mental maturity to dispute it. Normal, rational adults all understand what this means.
So, when are the adults in the room going to step up and say something about it? Or are we all just going to pretend we’re toddlers, and don’t understand what this means?
Seriously. That option needs to be removed from the Charter. I haven’t heard one instance where it was used in a positive way. It’s always to do something that violates someone else’s rights.
JFC, people…just rake the bloody forests already. Problem solved. /s
Markets up…markets down. But low…sell high. These assholes are making bank while the rest of us watch in horror.
He is the most healthy human being in all of history. No one is healthier or stronger than Donald Trump. He has the body of a 30 year old athlete and the mind of a genius.
So the trick to getting away with doing shit like this is to just be open about it? Weird. If that was the case, then why not give these Democrats a pass, as well? They aren’t exactly hiding it either.
Or are you just getting these four mixed up with the 200 others that didn’t support this legislation?
I’m fine calling out the 2% of Democrats that vote against their own constituents interests. But what I find hilarious, is the total lack of focus on the fact that 100% of Republicans are behind this.
This is what Chomsky was talking about when he wrote manufacturing consent. The framing here is massively deceptive, to the point of being completely backwards…and folks just eat it up this way. They swallow this narrative whole, and spit it back up for others to swallow.
Well, yeah. Just look at it. Why would anyone make that?
So, even more evidence of insider trading? Too bad they cut funding to all the agencies responsible for dealing with this kind of corruption.
I love how they never once mention in the article that Republicans wrote the bill, proposed it, and 100% of them voted in favor of it.
But, despite all that…the headline still reads, “Democrats passed it”.
Talk about learning all the wrong lessons.
Sounds like they’re running out of shit, man.
Not just the 1st…but, also the 14th.