• Archangel@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 day ago

    If he’s just going to let them all die from preventable causes, then he shouldn’t be allowed to have any more children. That’s just straight up negligence.

      • Runcible [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I get where you are drawing from but I don’t think this crosses over into eugenics. I interpreted this as being about cruelty/abuse not “too stupid to have kids” stuff.

        • barrbaric [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          1 day ago

          The issue here I think is that any policy that seeks to prevent people like this from having kids will require things like forced sterilization, and something like that will inevitably result in innocent people that the government labels undesirable also being sterilized, which is where eugenics comes into it. It’s much the same argument as being anti-carceral. Even in a communist utopia where the government in charge was 100% trustworthy I’d still be leery of forced sterilizations.