• Isthisreddit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Full agreement. My heart is with OP, but it’s a sad fact of life on this planet that peace without violence or threat of massive violence just is not usually possible.

    The truth is there are fucked up people out there, and worse there are the real parasites that seem to love licking the boots of horrible people (staring at Trump and his ass lickers).

    Honestly one just has to look at nature - everything from the bacteria to the plants to the birds and mammals are in a constant fight to the death over their next meal or territory - us primates have not been able to escape it, and I don’t think we will (staring at water scarcity, food scarcity, upcoming energy crisis, upcoming climate change crisis, etc etc). Sprinkle a little bit of population explosion into the mix, along with wealth disparity - It’s just gonna get fucking worse going forward I fear

    • Allero
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Not a critique of you personally, but people who look at the issue from that perspective tend to ignore that their own military can be the spark that ignites a massive conflict. Your own country’s military command can be those “fucked up people”.

      Army is the solution to the problem that army itself creates, and arming up is not maintaining peace - it’s exacerbating the problem.

      As per inequality - yes, we should fix that, and not just to prevent wars, but because everyone deserves to have a decent life - and we as humanity absolutely can make that happen. UN repeatedly stated we have more than enough resources to provide high quality of life to every person on the planet.

      • Isthisreddit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Sure, military industrial complex is probably the phrase you are looking for. I have no solution other than we tried our best in the US with having a civilian leader of the military, just it was impossible to foresee how much money would corrupt the entire political spectrum. All I can tell you is it’s established every society (no matter how big or small) is going to have to have some sort of defense - otherwise they will get pillaged sooner or later.

        Problem is people with armies usually want to start conquests eventually… No one has figured out how to stop this through history other than having a bigger and better army

        • Allero
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          …a bigger and better army which eventually goes into an all-out war.

          We had good tries with military alliances that drastically reduce the amount of soldiers required to defend the country as other countries’ soldiers are ready to join in.

          The problem is, they were formed against certain forces and got stuck with that mentality. We need a democratic worldwide alliance, probably led by the United Nations officials.