Essentially yes.
Normally, the amount of neutrons generated in a fusion reactor is an issue. Here it is an asset.
If some magical genie pays for it, clothes. My phone is not expensive, but clothes are pretty hefty priced these days.
Yup, already loooooong ago
UPD. Checked it out, the second part was released in 2016
Good, I also think the “some money” part in the end can be removed. It’s obvious and at the same time makes it sound a bit more rough than it needs to be.
Alright bud, you went too far into angry trolling territory.
Gosh, what .today has become these days…
This is one of the most problematic parts about vigilante justice and why it should be gone for good, regardless of what they are trying to achieve.
Nope, I’m not getting there. Sure, ephebophilia is a thing, and so is hebephilia, but in a given context there’s no point in this distinction.
I’m only saying that many cases of child abuse do not involve pedophiles/hebephiles/ephebophiles/whatever. Children are the easiest to take advantage of, and this is what drives quite a few hypersexual non-pedophiles to become child abusers despite not being predominantly attracted to children/minors to begin with.
Regardless of reasons, whoever abuses children deserves punishment - although I would much prefer for the police, not vigilantes, to be involved in it.
Guess this is what happens when you meet real people online who are not artificially enraged - a productive conversation!
Good luck proving you’re not anything to an angry mob.
Sure, but shows of this kind commonly imply that all pedophiles are child abusers and all child abusers are pedophiles, neither of which is true - and such equations have real-world negative implications.
There’s one more angle to this - apart from the raise in vigilante violence and messing up with police operations which both are very valid.
Just as we stopped getting TV feeds constantly equating pedophiles to child molesters, those guys stepped in to fill the void.
Pedophiles are not inherently child molesters. This kind of equation is not only wrong, it also adds to promoting dangerous behaviors among them.
Plenty of pedophiles will never abuse a single child, knowing full well it is dangerous and harmful for minors to be engaged in such relationships. However, the more we equate pedophiles to predators, the more people, especially in the emotionally vulnerable groups like teen pedophiles, will actually accept themselves in this role. Among those who stands against this anyway, plenty will become suicidal, not seeing an option to live a non-offending life.
Current methods of therapy aimed at reducing child abuse rates go very strongly on this - pedophiles should face message of them not being inherently dangerous, not the message of them being an immediate and imminent danger. Not only this is scientifically correct, it is actually useful in making these people safer for others.
That would be plausible if not for “X” (as in “ex” on the pic)
I’m feeling generous, let’s remember the good times~
This pic is getting more and more trimmed every time it is posted
There you go, the full pic:
Even better
I just came up with the absolute dumb simple solution :D
You’re gonna need a lot of very fine wire
Congrats - you just destroyed yeasts and useful molds (both are fungi).
Now we don’t have bread and most alcoholic beverages, skin is lacking natural protection, and yes - no more blue cheese.
In seriousness, this kind of opinion shows lack of understanding as to why those ecosystems are preserved in the first place. Not only are they directly responsible for producing things like oxygen, they prevent a lot of natural disasters (drought, cataclysmic hurricanes, land erosion, etc), and are able to naturally replenish their own resources, unlike agricultural land that either needs influx of matter from natural ecosystems, or requires finite resources extracted from Earth (for example, apatite).
As much as we think of ourselves as the conquerors of nature, in the long run we still cannot exist without it. We didn’t figure it out.