They would simply get arrested at the first threat because that’s already illegal and people like you, who dislike protest, are in charge of the levers of law enforcement. Your theoretical protest wouldn’t even happen.
JSO already crosses the “illegal” boundary with their traffic obstruction. Since they insist on illegal activity “civil disobedience” anyway, I would say that a calculated, effective act of protest against property is far less egregious than their counterproductive, impotent, whiny angst.
If a slight risk of jail time makes them squeamish, I can only doubt their commitment to the environment. Seems all they really want is attention.
They would simply get arrested at the first threat because that’s already illegal and people like you, who dislike protest, are in charge of the levers of law enforcement. Your theoretical protest wouldn’t even happen.
JSO already crosses the “illegal” boundary with their traffic obstruction. Since they insist on
illegal activity“civil disobedience” anyway, I would say that a calculated, effective act of protest against property is far less egregious than their counterproductive, impotent, whiny angst.If a slight risk of jail time makes them squeamish, I can only doubt their commitment to the environment. Seems all they really want is attention.