• NJSpradlin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    3 days ago

    Isn’t this shit already illegal, but the real issue is you can’t enforce the law against the ultra-rich?

    • FundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s pretty obviously illegal if you interpret rules. But the conservative supreme court just finds weird alternative interpretations. So writing a law that directly states it means the supreme court cant really interpret thenselves out of it.

      • Rivalarrival
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 days ago

        They just rule that “spending money” is speech.

        That makes the law an unconstitutional infringement on the first amendment.