• FundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s pretty obviously illegal if you interpret rules. But the conservative supreme court just finds weird alternative interpretations. So writing a law that directly states it means the supreme court cant really interpret thenselves out of it.

    • Rivalarrival
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      They just rule that “spending money” is speech.

      That makes the law an unconstitutional infringement on the first amendment.