• madame_gaymes@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    Something something Half Life 3

    But also, fuck no. I would never trust modern software or hardware companies to develop something that is going to be connected to my brain. We can’t even trust social media or AI companies not to fuck us up without the physical connection.

      • madame_gaymes@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I get where you’re coming from, but being paraplegic doesn’t make Musk and Newell any less driven by money. Maybe Newell will surprise me and make it open source, which would help me see it as an actual philanthropic venture.

        If society was headed towards Star Trek I’d be less apprehensive, but as it is we’re in for an even more bleak version of 1984 somehow.

      • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Tell that to the blind people with cybernetic eye implants that have been discontinued and are now broken. Or people with implanted insulin pumps from now defunct companies.

        These are problems that are already occurring with less serious implanted medical technology.

        • madame_gaymes@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Bingo. Being handicapped in any way doesn’t make you less vulnerable to exploitation or decisions driven by shareholders and money. In a lot of cases, it actually increases the chances from my perspective.

      • simple@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Definitely. People need to understand this tech isn’t for the average person, but there are still a lot of people that would definitely benefit from it. If you told someone scientists are researching drilling machines to your bone you’d get similar WTF responses, but that’s how modern limb replacement works.

        • madame_gaymes@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          I don’t see limb replacements this way at all, but typically limb replacements also do not rely on 3rd party services that might disappear at any time and are almost purely mechanical.

          My brother lost his left arm, and what he is getting is controlled entirely by the nub with no outside influence or implanted microchips.

          • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            This is part of what frustrates me so much about these brain chips. They feel far too much like a solution in search of a problem when we have so many other non-invasive options for interface between the body and “cybernetics”, even if we’re looking for things “at the speed of thought”.

          • Zexks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Not anywhere near to the level he would have with direct nerve interaction. Just because you all don’t understand this or the need doesn’t mean others are as ignorant. Or willing to settle for lessor functionality.

            • madame_gaymes@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 hour ago

              I never said something like direct nerve interaction is terrible or nonexistent. My brother also does not like the idea of having something implanted, and would much rather have a mechanical device that he has a chance to repair himself should anything break. That’s not being ignorant to anything, just pragmatic.

              What I did say is not to trust a money-making business to do it right and not leave you high and dry if they go belly-up.

              ETA: also, under the USA healthcare system, something like you suggest is unaffordable for a good chunk of people and the VA only approved the mechanical device any way.

        • Mustakrakish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          It just should be owned by the people, and not multi-billionaire companies who usenit to extort profit from sick and people with disabilities

    • Alphane Moon@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      It is completely out of the question to trust any modern technology company with something like a brain interface.

  • Evotech@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    All your going to end up with is a subscription on your own brain and possibly ads

  • VeryVito@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Yes, but honestly the ad-free Real Life+ plan is totally worth the extra $49.95/month just to avoid the ads from interrupting when you’re driving, performing root canals or operating a bandsaw.

    • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      No, it’s totally free. No ads. It just uses your data to serve ads elsewhere.

      Oh, we told you 2 years ago, it would stay that way and you’ve had irreversible brain surgery now. Well, the servers cost a lot to keep running and so, it was inevitable really. We can’t continue to provide the service without charging something. Oh, and there’s ads now.

      Oh, you’ve been happily paying. Well, now we have analysed your data and determined you can afford to pay more. Totally a choice. You can cancel anytime. But once the chop is switched off, some people experience a deterioration in executive functioning. And now that it’s common, you can’t travel or drive without an activated chip. And of course Tesla still hasn’t got self driving cars, despite calling their latest package ‘its totally self driving now pinky promise’.

  • Kowowow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I guess it’s nice to have competing companies doing this stuff even if it’s not for me

  • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I can understand the medical advances this opens, but I hope there can be non implant options for more “casual” options. I’ve found Gabe’s brain interface research fascinating for years- and it feels so sci-fi we’re talking about real applications now.

    • iglou@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It’s highly likely it will be restricted to implants only for quite some time, judging by how difficult it already is that way!