• Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    4 days ago

    My money (while I have it) is that this is going to be the most lasting damage of Trump’s presidency. Piss off the world and demonstrate we’re unreliable economic partners. They don’t want our debt anymore and dump their holdings/new purchases at auction. Servicing debt is already around 15% of All federal spending. DOGE targets are nothing in comparison.

    Debt can get very expensive, and we’ve gotten used to paying very little for it. Most people aren’t considering how bad this can get - I hope someone with power has been

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      4 days ago

      Trump struts around driveling about how everyone is ripping off the US left and right when in fact we have a stranglehold on most of the world, favored status almost everywhere we go, and structural advantages we forced on the world and have been milking for decades.

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      4 days ago

      Doge’s cuts can’t event cover Doge’s costs, let alone anything else, let alone all the following damages resulting from those cuts.

    • spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Absolutely. Republicans don’t realize just how tenuous our status on the world stage, and thought it was still the 1950s. With everything they’re doing, we’re absolutely cooked for decades to come.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        With everything they’re doing, we’re absolutely cooked for decades to come.

        That implies we’d ever recover and this isn’t just the permanent end of American dominance.

        Sentiments like yours are probably the same sorts of things some British folks were telling themselves after WWII as their empire slipped away.

        • spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          That implies we’d ever recover and this isn’t just the permanent end of American dominance.

          Oh no, you completely took the wrong implication out of this.

          “We’re cooked for decades” meaning that we’re absolutely fucked, but it might not be awful after a few decades. I have no allusions that the American hegemony will ever return.

      • Ledericas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        i doubt thier low information voters will even look this deep, the gop? probably thought trump wouldnt go this far with the tariffs.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Many advisors have.

      Many debt hawks in Congress have too.

      But it’s not populist policy because the concept is too complex, so it’s never politically tenable. :/

      • ftbd@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        How is this too complex? Isn’t ‘fiscal responsibility’ a classical republican platform? I would have assumed most (especially older) voters are already familiar with the topic.

        • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Isn’t ‘fiscal responsibility’ a classical republican platform?

          Hence classical Republicans got swallowed by MAGA, and no one is listening to Democrats ramble on.

          If policy doesn’t fit in an angry Tweet or a Tiktok-length video, it (on aggregate) doesn’t stick. That’s just how it is :(

    • cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 days ago

      The dumping isn’t actually occurring in the traditional sense; central banks typically hold short-term maturities (around 2 years) between them for stability. Japan is the primary foreign holder of us debt. In reality, there’s no need for them to sell off these assets. They can simply wait until they mature, as selling would negatively impact their own investments. On top, they could decide to not participate in new auctions or request higher yields at those auctions.

      https://www.statista.com/statistics/246420/major-foreign-holders-of-us-treasury-debt/

      • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        4 days ago

        Please explain the significance of this to someone who’s never bought a bond but has dug through a couch to find spare change for groceries.

        • YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          35
          ·
          4 days ago

          US Government Bonds are referred to as “risk free debt” because it is seen as the safest investment in existence. The US has never missed a payment in the whole history of the country.

          Because of that all interest rates are related to the bond rate. People are getting nervous that US bonds are no longer trust worthy so they are demanding higher interest rates. This is terrible for the economy because those are the floor of interest rates. Meaning the cost to borrow is going up along with the cost of every thing else.

            • YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              4 days ago

              I always would argue with my finance professors that calling it risk free was stupid given that most governments default on their debt eventually, and the US is probably no different

          • tormeh@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            4 days ago

            They’re only the floor because they’re seen as risk free. “Why lend someone money for less than what the US government is offering you? The government is always gonna pay you back, after all”. If that mentality changes then treasury bonds will no longer be the floor, because you’d rather lend the money to someone else than the US government.

            Not that this isn’t disastrous for the US. Increased taxes, cuts to medicare/medicaid/military, a government default, or a mix of all three are an inevitability. The US government can probably keep paying interest payment costs with more debt for a while, but not forever. These movements in the bond market takes us closer to the end of the USA’s debt spree.

        • cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          In short, if the government plans to spend a lot, and people worry about prices going up, bond yields rise. This can make borrowing more expensive for everyone

          Tap for longer
          1. Government Budget: When the government makes a plan for how to spend money (the budget), it can include a lot of spending on things like roads, schools, or healthcare Or Tax cuts or Big Beautiful Bill

          2. Rising Bond Yields: If people think this spending will cause prices to go up (inflation), they want more money back for lending to the government. So, they ask for higher interest on bonds, which is called a higher yield.

          3. Why It Matters:

            • More Expensive Loans: If bond yields go up, banks might charge more for loans (like for houses or cars), making it costlier to borrow money.
            • Investing Choices: People might choose to invest in bonds instead of stocks if they think bonds are safer or offer better returns.
          • Cenzorrll@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            4 days ago

            Eli5 version:

            Sam likes candy, and in the past, Sam has been very good at paying kids back for candy with a little bonus for doing so. Sam wants more candy, but Sam has lately been acting weird and unreliable, so no one wants to give them any because they aren’t as confident that they will get paid back. Sam is now offering to give back even more in the future than his usual amount in the hopes that someone will give him candy. Sam is still acting pretty sketch, and getting more sketch every day.

            • Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              4 days ago

              Then Sam needs to start resorting to force and/or threats of force to ensure his access to candy. Don’t bother stealing from the candy store, but beat up weaker kids and take their lunch money to buy candy, with the clear implication that any resistance in the future will lead to more extreme violence.

          • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            4 days ago

            Also, risk is a factor.

            If you lend money to your flaky cousin, you might want more interest to cover the risk of him never paying you back. If you lend money to your twin sister who has never missed a single thing in her life, maybe half a percent will do.

            Well, the US just started moving into flaky cousin territory after two centuries of reliable sister.

      • peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 days ago

        5.023%. goddamn. I know they were purposely trying to trigger a recession, but it actually went over 5%.

        I wonder what the massive over-leveraged asset will be this time.

          • peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            As far as I can tell, everything reports a supply gap. It is decreasing in the south, notably.

            That would imply demand is driving real estate prices up. That’s not going to be an overleveraged asset, as far as I know Residential Mortgage Backed Securities are not nearly as exposed as they were in 2007. I have a suspicion that Commercial Mortgage Backed Securities are over leveraged, but I have no way of proving that.

            It could be what you’re implying is that the broad ownership of housing is inflated on purpose to drive prices up, and that something will make residences an unattractive investment. I don’t know what that something could be - as the only thing that’s a safer investment thatlln residential real estate is probably gold?

      • Eheran@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        4 days ago

        Hm? So? Seems like there is zero correlation to Trump getting into office.

    • NeilBrü@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I think that train (i.e., “Decline-of-the-UK-Express”) started after WW1, if I’m recalling the statistics portion of my contemporary history class in university.

  • Doom@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Curious how this fits into his crypto scheme. Family friend is obsessed with it and I just know he’s gonna regret it