The DNC cited a procedural concern, but Hogg said it is “impossible to ignore the broader context” of his criticisms.

  • JustAnotherPodunk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    19 hours ago

    So where, pray tell, do the progressive votes go?

    Primary them sure. Try and snag it back. But you won’t turn your next vote red. You know that. And they know that. And I sure as fuck won’t do it either. The DNC can rot. But…

    You can and should blame the two party system sure. But if you don’t primary and win. Well. We’ve seen that before again and again.

    I’m a progressive that will vote blue again. Reluctantly. Emphatically so. But I will.

    The posturing of principals means nothing in our political reality. And it pisses me off. But reality doesn’t care about your feelings.

    • mrcleanup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Honestly, maybe it’s time for progressives to take over the Republican party primary and start moving them left .

    • DancingBear@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I no longer vote for neoliberals or for folks who receive aipac money.

      Period.

      I won’t vote for a republican either.

      If they want my vote they have to support policies that I do.

      Period.

      Blue no matter who is how we got here.

      • samus12345@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Blue no matter who is how we got here.

        No, because Trump wouldn’t have won if that were the case.

        • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I don’t think so. There’s a reason the democratic party is polling worse than Trump. They’re snakebit, even their own voters are disgusted with them. They’ve decided that their optimal strategy for winning national elections is pointing out (accurately) that the other guy is a Nazi and literally nothing else, and they’re still losing, that’s how fucking snakebit they are. There’s nowhere left to go at this point, the plan seems to still be “ratchet right to peel off two more moderate republicans and ask people to be satisfied with just voting against the Nazis for the rest of their lives”, which is a plan that has now failed 2/3 times.

          Vote blue no matter who, think about that phrase for a second. That’s basically saying “shut up, don’t think, just do vote for any POS we put out and be happy about it”. Doesn’t seem like very good marketing to me. Do you think the Republicans have to tell their voters to hold their nose, suck it up, and vote no matter how much they hate the candidate? This is investing in loser energy, it’s a shit strategy that’s basically engineered from the ground up to lose.

          • samus12345@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            They suck, no doubt about it, but fascists suck way, way more. “Vote blue no matter who” is effectively what you have to do in a two-party system, but in reality not voting red is what’s important. And yes, “Vote for the guys who are less bad” is a terrible message and contributes to the fascists winning. But voting is vital (even now, if only at a more local level), and not voting for fascists is extremely important.

            Voting for whoever will cause the least harm to the country is the right thing to do. “I won’t vote for the lesser evil!” does not accomplish this and actually goes in the opposite direction. But people are emotional and not practical beings overall, so the guys who are better at appealing to emotions win and we all suffer for it.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Primary them sure.

      Democratic primaries are kabuki. Trying to oust Hogg is just the latest demonstration.

    • peregrin5@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      So where, pray tell, do the progressive votes go?

      Silly wabbit. Progressives don’t vote.

      • Bigfoot@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        60 minutes ago

        The fewer MAGAs that vote the better IMO, democratic candidates shouldn’t make concessions to people like you.

        • resipsaloquitur@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          57 minutes ago

          “Concessions to people like me”:

          1. Public transport
          2. public education
          3. public healthcare

          I’m not in dire need of any of those. But I’m not a selfish dickhead.

          • Bigfoot@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            53 minutes ago

            “if i dont get my twains then i wont stop trans ppl from losing their healthcare”

            good thing you’re obv too young to vote anyway

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      18 hours ago

      But reality doesn’t care about your feelings.

      Yeah so… uh… That kinda goes both ways. I’ve made this argument before so I’m just gonna copy paste it, but lemme just…

      Have you ever heard of gambler’s ruin? It’s the name of a few different results in statistics, but the one we want is this:

      In statistics, gambler’s ruin is the fact that a gambler playing a game with negative expected value will eventually go bankrupt, regardless of their betting system.

      Now in modern US elections, does your bet have a positive or negative expected value for democracy? Is America becoming more or less of a democracy every election on average? Apply the theorem above to your answer and see what you get.

      To change the inevitable result, which is fascism in the United States, you have to change the game in some way, and primarying incumbents and voting blue no matter who is what progressives are already doing.

      • Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Your metaphor is flawed. Opting out does not save you anything because voting doesn’t cost you anything in the first place. If you got a free bet, why wouldn’t you take it?

        It’s more like we’re on a sinking ship and bailing water. The ship is going down if we don’t patch the hole, but bailing water still buys us time so that we can make more attempts to patch the hole. Except in this metaphor, bailing is something that takes maybe an hour of your time once every two years.

        • Rancor_Tangerine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Dems aren’t helping the ship stay afloat. They’re stopping the people from patching the hole because they’re “powerless”. Dems and Reps aren’t the same because they’re equally as bad, they’re the same because they’re on the same team. They’re both shameless fascists.

          • Bigfoot@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            58 minutes ago

            ok but one of the shameless fascists isn’t deporting innocent people to a prison in el salvador or denying women healthcare

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Opting out does not save you anything because voting doesn’t cost you anything in the first place.

          The bet here isn’t voting; it’s elections. An election is an essentially random process where depending on the result things change either for the best or for the worst. If you somehow quantify how far America is from fascism (say, in terms of how many Republican terms it would take to go from the situation at hand to full-blown fascism) then you can model elections as a bet where you’re forced to participate and don’t get to choose your stake. Again, under this model (which should be accurate since the conditions for its application are all there) you will end up at fascism unless you change the game you’re being forced to play so the odds are in your favor rather than the fascists’. I also want to point out that this isn’t an analogy; it’s a model. I’m simply taking a principle that exists in one field, making some simplifying assumptions and applying it in another. What I outlined here isn’t a “what if” analogy; it’s one step removed from a mathematical certainty.

          It’s more like we’re on a sinking ship and bailing water. The ship is going down if we don’t patch the hole, but bailing water still buys us time so that we can make more attempts to patch the hole. Except in this metaphor, bailing is something that takes maybe an hour of your time once every two years.

          I have no problem with the act of voting itself. My problem is with… everything else that happens during election season. The whole idea of unity with liberals (aka Democrats) against the right is evidently a failed preposition, and the reason for that failure is specifically that the Democratic Party is invested in the game’s present state and will force you (or, more accurately, already forces you) to cooperate with them to maintain the game before you’re allowed to be “united” with them. To borrow your analogy, the Democrats are the ship’s captain, who is helping you bail water but only on the condition that you don’t patch the holes (and yes, there’s more than one). You’re not even supposed to point out that neither you nor him are patching the holes. Instead, you and the rest of the crew are supposed to just keep bailing and ignore the rising water level. And to be clear, the bailing isn’t just one thing you do every two years; that doesn’t begin to capture the opportunity cost involved. Your bailing in this analogy is voting drives, canvassing and other outreach on behalf of the Democrats; it’s political donations; it’s suppressing criticism of the DNC (attempts to get the captain to patch the damn hole) in the name of unity against the far-right. The actual voting is only the end of this long string of actions that sap energy, money and credibility from the people who would otherwise be out there actually patching the damn holes.

          Okay analogy over, back to the real world. The DNC should’ve been fucking flayed alive when they tried to push a pro-genocide ex-DA on Americans, and instead all they got was progressives hushing down other progressives in the name of “unity”. I’m sure you can think of all sorts of examples of this in action, but here’s one to drive the point: the progressive reaction to the Uncommitted Movement. This was a large movement that had gained momentum in an attempt to push the DNC from proto-fascism and into the sanity, and what did they get from not even liberals, but progressives who should have been their most ardent supporters? “Hold your nose and vote for her.” Not a nationwide solidarity to force the Democrats to back down on their most unpopular policies, not even tepid support or apathy, but active, emphatic opposition. That’s not the stuff of democracy; that’s a dictatorship where you roll a dice every four years to find out which boot will step on your neck until the next election.

          I should note: I’m not advocating for passivity or apathy here. This shouldn’t be a reason for you or anyone else to stay home and give up; it should be an impetus to organize, embrace solidarity between workers and take on the capitalists and their supporters. Act, but act according to your own conscience, not according to the DNC’s agenda. This is especially important right now because the Democrats won’t save you from fascism even if they wanted to, but even if democracy and the DNC both survive Trump, next time you be on the side doing the flaying and not the side practicing cannibalism on behalf of your blue donkey overlords.

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        This exactly. I have voted for every progressive candidate that has come up on the ballot. And yet every single time the middle of the road Democrat wins. Because that’s where the DNC puts the money. And in the general I always vote for whatever Democrat has won the primary. And quite frankly I always feel sick that I voted for somebody that I wouldn’t vote for if I had a better choice.

        So I think I’m going to choose not to vote in the general if the progressive I vote for doesn’t win. I’m tired of a democratic party that is more interested in protecting their position than actually doing their job.

        • peregrin5@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          5 hours ago

          And yet every single time the middle of the road Democrat wins.

          It couldn’t be that the middle of the road Democrat is simply popular among the majority of the voting population? Nah couldn’t be. Everybody in my family loves when I rant about the benefits of communism at Thanksgiving.

          • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            53 minutes ago

            That’s funny.

            You know what’s funnier, and not in a ha ha funny way. The way I bring up progressive candidates to people and they have no idea who it is. It’s not about popularity. It’s about how the media, that is controlled by both parties, only seems to report on the chosen few.

        • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          I think you should still vote just to show you’re an active voter that they failed to court, but vote for independents, 3rd party, write in, whatever.

          Honestly, I think the only solution for progressives is to elect enough independents that mathematically, while a minority, MUST be courted by the establishment parties in order to secure their legislation. Though that won’t do anything for legislation that both establishment parties fully agree on, that’ll still get rammed through.

          But what are we even talking about? These are all legal constructs. We’re living post rule of law now. Dictator just flat ignoring courts.

          • jonne@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Yeah, that’s basically the situation in Australia. The crossbench is needed to pass anything in the Senate, but Liberals and Labour routinely join forces to pass some truly disgusting shit (most recently an election reform that would reduce funding to the smaller parties, and a takeover of one of the biggest unions in the country).

        • TonyOstrich@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Like another poster said casting a blank ballet sends much more of a message than not voting at all.

        • Mister_Hangman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Exactly this. Stop giving the DNC money. Whenever you can send the message to the officials. No progressive platform and change? No removal of incumbents? No money. No vote.

          It isn’t _just _ on us to do something. If they too don’t wanna see the fascists win, then it’s time for them to eat humble pie and realize their policies and their positions for the past 30-40 years brought this pig to prom. They have to pass the torch.

          Fascism might be defeated again but it will come at the cost of neoliberalism finally dying as well. There’s very little options of anything else working.

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I think we need a different color to vote for. Definitely not green, because that party is for shit. But Democrats are functionally useless at this point.

      I think I would rather throw my vote away on somebody who challenges the status quo in a progressive way under the Democratic socialist party (or just the plain socialist party) rather than vote for some goddamn Democrat who’s going to uselessly wring their hands and then go home to their million dollar mansion and cry about how unfair people are being to their useless ass.

      Voting blue hasn’t helped cause they think it’s your only option so they don’t have to actually do anything to earn your vote other than being “not a Republican”.

      FUCK THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY

      I’M NOT VOTING FOR ANOTHER MODERATE ASSHOLE

    • Zenith@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      No where they sit their ass at home so the red hats don’t come for us for voting for dems who won’t even do a fucking thing to combat this. If I’m going to go on record as being against the regime it better be for a good reason, and this ain’t it