The DNC cited a procedural concern, but Hogg said it is “impossible to ignore the broader context” of his criticisms.

  • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    This exactly. I have voted for every progressive candidate that has come up on the ballot. And yet every single time the middle of the road Democrat wins. Because that’s where the DNC puts the money. And in the general I always vote for whatever Democrat has won the primary. And quite frankly I always feel sick that I voted for somebody that I wouldn’t vote for if I had a better choice.

    So I think I’m going to choose not to vote in the general if the progressive I vote for doesn’t win. I’m tired of a democratic party that is more interested in protecting their position than actually doing their job.

    • peregrin5@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      And yet every single time the middle of the road Democrat wins.

      It couldn’t be that the middle of the road Democrat is simply popular among the majority of the voting population? Nah couldn’t be. Everybody in my family loves when I rant about the benefits of communism at Thanksgiving.

    • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I think you should still vote just to show you’re an active voter that they failed to court, but vote for independents, 3rd party, write in, whatever.

      Honestly, I think the only solution for progressives is to elect enough independents that mathematically, while a minority, MUST be courted by the establishment parties in order to secure their legislation. Though that won’t do anything for legislation that both establishment parties fully agree on, that’ll still get rammed through.

      But what are we even talking about? These are all legal constructs. We’re living post rule of law now. Dictator just flat ignoring courts.

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Yeah, that’s basically the situation in Australia. The crossbench is needed to pass anything in the Senate, but Liberals and Labour routinely join forces to pass some truly disgusting shit (most recently an election reform that would reduce funding to the smaller parties, and a takeover of one of the biggest unions in the country).

    • TonyOstrich@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Like another poster said casting a blank ballet sends much more of a message than not voting at all.

    • Mister_Hangman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Exactly this. Stop giving the DNC money. Whenever you can send the message to the officials. No progressive platform and change? No removal of incumbents? No money. No vote.

      It isn’t _just _ on us to do something. If they too don’t wanna see the fascists win, then it’s time for them to eat humble pie and realize their policies and their positions for the past 30-40 years brought this pig to prom. They have to pass the torch.

      Fascism might be defeated again but it will come at the cost of neoliberalism finally dying as well. There’s very little options of anything else working.