Lemmy Today
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Just Post@lemmy.world · 2 days ago

An email from Steve Jobs to the CEO of Adobe in 2005

lemmy.world

message-square
24
link
fedilink
240

An email from Steve Jobs to the CEO of Adobe in 2005

lemmy.world

The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Just Post@lemmy.world · 2 days ago
message-square
24
link
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • turtlesareneat@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    As a kid I emailed a lot of Silicon Valley execs and once got a response from Jobs. He explained in about 4 words why my idea was bad. The guy was surgical with words especially in emails.

  • fadhl3y@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Spoken like a feudal lord who believes that Lord Adobe is taking his serfs.

  • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Catmull & Lasseter at PIXAR was into the same shit.

    https://www.cultofmac.com/news/sony-stood-steve-jobs-wage-fixing-schemes-pixar

    it’s not enough to employ people, these fucks think they OWN THEM AND THEIR TALENT FOREVER.

    It’s disgusting.

  • A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I’ll still gladly piss on his grave but that’s pretty good. Can’t you just picture that douchebag typing this aloud to himself like “and SEND! What a dick.”

    Edit: “I’m gonna use short simple sentences so this fuckin moron can get the point.”

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      70
      ·
      2 days ago

      it’s perfect email composition. short and simple, right to the point, while still containing enough relevant information.

      • A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah, agreed. Say only what you need to, let the implications do their own work.

        • GorGor@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          yeah, why be explicit about the illegal collusion.

          • A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            2 days ago

            Is it illegal to agree not to recruit each other’s workers? I’d be kinda surprised.

            • jet@hackertalks.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Very much illegal. It’s a form of labor wage control

              Imagine once you get a FAANG job you cant get another job offer from a different FAANG company, now your stuck, no price bidding, no ladder hopping, no finding a new job when your unhappy

              • 𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                18
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                It is not illegal. Companies can agree to not recruit - an activity initiated by recruiters - from each other. Now, if they agreed to not hire each other’s employees, that would be a violation of right-to-work.

                He nowhere says he has a rule to not hire Adobe employees; he’s saying he has a rule that his recruiters can’t use Adobe’s employee org chart as a shopping menu. That’s completely legal.

                • A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Yeah I’m with you

                • GorGor@startrek.website
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  I don’t think that is accurate. I am not a lawyer but I believe that it is collusion between competitors with the intent to manipulate the labor market.

  • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    We’re all on the same page in this thread so far. If we weren’t, we could simply supplant Jobs with a less divisive character.

    Then, we’d be unencumbered in appreciating the simplicity and beauty of this unavoidably inherently spicy email. Love this one!

    Another with a backstory I won’t spoil:

  • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    2 days ago

    However you felt about him, one email from this guy could ruin a company.

    • SaltSong@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yea, that’s one reason I feel the way I do enjoy him.

  • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Wall street crime will never send you to the slammer.

    • Oniononon@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      white collar crime is like alchemy. You take the right amount of anti labour violations, mix it in with tax dodging, add some pedophilia, a few fun felonies, rub it on literal and very obvious treason and you synthesize a president.

    • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Martha Stewart would like a word with you…

      • Glytch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Martha was a scapegoat

      • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        The exception that proves the rule?

        That was also over 20 years ago!

        • GoodLuckToFriends
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Over? Goddamn.

          • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yep, she got out of prison March 2005.

Just Post@lemmy.world

justpost@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !justpost@lemmy.world

Just post something 💛

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 36 users / day
  • 599 users / week
  • 1.67K users / month
  • 4.81K users / 6 months
  • 21 local subscribers
  • 851 subscribers
  • 490 Posts
  • 5.66K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • suns3t@lemmy.world
  • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org