- They drove there in their own vehicle
- They were seen on CCTV cameras going there and back
- They turned off their phones around the time when the tree was cut down
- They filmed it being cut down
- They took a photo of a piece of the tree in the back of their car
- They discussed it over text messages and voice notes as the media coverage picked up
- They pled not guilty 🤣
Have you ever dealt with the court of law? You always plead guilty. Always.
There are very, very few scenarios where you dont.
I was a juror on a trial and the guy involved clearly was several chicken nuggets short of a happy meal, like these two, there was mountains of evidence against him including body cam footage from a police officer, and he still pleaded not guilty.
By the way his defence essentially amounted to, there were other people in the area who also had criminal records, so maybe they did it.
They’re also experienced tree fellers. Couldn’t make it up.
What depressed me most about the loss of the sycamore is nobody would ever face consequences for it. I figured it would be impossible to prove.
But I’ll be damned the morons recorded themselves doing it. What the actual fuck. How do people this dim exist?
Looks like only two of them are facing consequences; the other one seems to be getting off scot-free.
Scott-free? Yes, that’s what Hadrian’s wall was for…
Now I’m kind of wondering about the etymology there.
kagis
Hmm. Apparently different etymologies:
https://www.etymonline.com/word/Scot
Scot
Old English Scottas (plural) “inhabitants of Ireland, Irishmen,” from Late Latin Scotti (c. 400), a name of uncertain origin, perhaps from Celtic (but answering to no known tribal name; Irish Scots appears to be a Latin borrowing). The name followed the Irish tribe which invaded Scotland 6c. C.E. after the Romans withdrew from Britain, and after the time of Alfred the Great the Old English word described only the Irish who had settled in the northwest of Britain.
https://www.etymonline.com/word/scot-free
scot-free(adj.)
late Old English scotfreo “exempt from royal tax,” from scot (n.) “royal tax” + freo “free” (see free (adj.)).
https://www.etymonline.com/word/Scot
scot(n.)
“royal tax,” a term that survived in old law and in scot-free; late Old English, “municipal charges and taxes,” also “a royal tax or contribution sometimes levied for support of local officers.” This is from Old Norse skot “contribution,” etymologically “a shooting, shot; a thing shot, a missile” (from PIE root *skeud- “to shoot, chase, throw”). The Old Norse verb form, skjota, has a secondary sense of “transfer to another; pay.” It is related to Old English sceotan “to pay, contribute,” Middle English scotten “to bear one’s share of;” Dutch schot, German Schoß “tax, contribution.”
Also via Old French escot “reckoning, payment” (Modern French écot “share”), and via Medieval Latin scotum, scottum, both from Germanic, as is Spanish ecote.
From c. 1300 as “payment for food or drink at a social gathering,” also figurative (late 12c.), a sense also in the Old French word. Hence scot-ale (n.) “a drinking party, probably compulsory, held by a sheriff, forester, bailiff, etc., for which a contribution was exacted” [Middle English Compendium], attested from late 12c., with ending as in bridal. “Scot implies a contribution toward some object to which others contributed equally” [Century Dictionary].
The word ‘Scotland’ basically means ‘land of the lrish people’
Fun to remind lowlanders about this to annoy them.
This is the sort of crime that putting people in public stocks should be brought back for.
Imagine these two pieces of shit locked in a pillory, at the site of the felled tree, while thousands of people queue up to tell them what seawards they are.
Why am I not surprised that he looks like this
Who do these clowns think they are, Mitchells & Butlers?
Mr Graham, from Carlisle, and Mr Carruthers, of Wigton, Cumbria, have each denied two counts of criminal damage.
Why am I not surprised. 'ang 'em!!!
'ang 'em!!!
Might be better to have them plant more trees along Hadrian’s Wall, if people enjoy said trees. Turn the affair into a net positive for people who will be eventually walking along the wall in the future.
so… why? why did they cut it down?
Looks like they just did it for a laugh
Testosterone?
Whatever sentence they get will be a slap on the wrist. For some reason white dudes destroying ancient history is never punished very harshly.
tree destroyed
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sycamore_Gap_tree
The stump has thrown up seedlings and is still alive, albeit severely coppiced, but is expected to take more than 150 years to recover.
May or may not wind up quite as photogenic, but with apologies to Mark Twain, the reports of its death have been greatly exaggerated.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/sycamore-gap-tree-newcastle-crown-court-b2737600.html
Saplings from the tree are being grown and will be planted at sites across the UK, with the first already gifted to King Charles for planting in Windsor Great Park this winter. Shoots have also emerged from the base of the Sycamore Gap tree.
deleted by creator
The landmark is still destroyed. A stump isn’t the same. What made the tree special was because it was pretty.
Yeah, but I mean, it’s probably far from being the only pretty tree in the country.
It sounds like it became a thing due to being in Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves.
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-tyne-66994729
While a popular spot for walkers and photographers due to its unusual setting, it became famous after featuring in the 1991 film Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves starring Kevin Costner. Afterwards it gained the nickname the Robin Hood Tree - although in reality it was some 170 miles (273 km) from Sherwood Forest.
It looks like there’s a new Robin Hood movie coming out (The Death of Robin Hood), and IMDB says that the filming is in the UK and Northern Ireland (well…should probably be Great Britain and Northern Ireland, but whatever). Maybe they can find themselves another nice tree in the UK for filming. Maybe the National Trust or some council that wants a famous tree can point 'em in the appropriate direction.
…maybe use an oak or yew or something even more long-lived and historically-accurate too, as the sycamore is an import…
http://www.mikepalmer.co.uk/woodyplantecology/sycamore/greatbritain.htm
Jones (1944) found that the first definite record of sycamore in England is that of Lyte in 1578, but suggests that it is probable that it was introduced to Scotland at a slightly earlier date. Some workers have argued that the Romans could have introduced it, but no conclusive evidence can be found (Bleay 1987). Sycamore remained rare around houses and in hedges though by the 17th and 18th centuries nursery records show stocking and sale of young sycamores (Bleay 1987). However, it was not extensively planted until the late 18th century (Jones 1944).
That first record of introduction is centuries after King Richard the Lionheart was running around.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_I_of_England
Reign: 3 September 1189 – 6 April 1199
Robin Hood was supposed to be a contemporary figure of King Richard, so he probably wouldn’t have been spending time around sycamores…