• flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    9 hours ago

    No kidding your honor. The question is what exactly are you or any other judge going to do about it?

    I don’t mean that in a Trump is right kind of way. I mean it in a this is something the judiciary needs to be seriously looking into sooner rather than later.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      83
      ·
      13 hours ago

      That’s what the article states. She’s mandating two weeks of intense discovery, which will lead to contempt of court if they cannot prove they have done everything in their power to return him.

      • stickly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Honest question: if the administration’s defense is shrugging because he’s in another country, doesn’t the judge have an easy layup to shut down CECOT deportations?

        They can’t have it both ways, either follow due process or keep your slave detention camps domestic. It’s not interfering in foreign policy to point out they need to choose.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          9 hours ago

          She did, with an injunction that they are continuing to defy. That’s another contempt of court charge. She has to do this slowly and methodically to prevent giving them evidence of bias when they appeal her rulings. The downside to a just court is the pace. Had we a functional Congress that wasn’t packed with loyalists, this would’ve been over by now.

    • SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      How can they be found in contempt when they were never out of contempt.

      They don’t care what judges say. The judges are just NOW finding that out?

      • eRac@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        In the legal system, far more things get reversed due to procedural issues than on merit. Generally, this is a good thing. A judge should not be able to hand out punishment on a whim.

        As with most protections, fascists destroy the ones that limit them and cling to those that benefit them.

  • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    12 hours ago

    This whole case has collapsed into a handful of choices:

    1. Judge doesn’t declare the Trump admin in Contempt of Court (i.e. does nothing). This sets precedent that Trump’s administration enjoys full immunity from the judiciary, officially turning the US into a dictatorship. This is what has been happening for weeks and remains by far the most likely scenario.
    2. Judge declares Trump in Contempt of Court, but is unable to enforce it. This is equivalent to scenario 1.
    3. Judge declares the Trump admin in Contempt of Court and deputizes state police to enforce the ruling and arrest, if not Trump, at least some officials. This would be legal and remains the only constitutional solution, but would almost certainly trigger an armed response from the regime. Democracy doesn’t go down without a fight, but the end result is uncertain.
    4. Pro-democracy factions use illegal/violent means to force Trump to comply (military coup, sudden Luigi’s Mansion remake, etc.). However it would seem that the masks fell off and despite decades of propaganda to the contrary, literally not a single living American is willing to put their life on the line to protect Democracy.
    • JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The administration will just apply for an appeal to the decision - 6 months - then if it is approved it goes to a one man Supreme Court ruling (18 months), then they appeal again (12 months) and it goes to the full bench (24 months) who will declare its now outside the scope of action.

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        There’s a serious chance they’ll have the guy killed to get the judge off their back without having to be seen backing down, and to show judges what happens when they try to challenge the regime on a deportation case.

        • Revan343@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Which would definitely be contempt of court when the whole thing leaks because they added another goddamned reporter to the signal conversation about it

          • Draces@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            And then we get to watch Fox News talk about how brilliant and righteous the regime is

    • BeNotAfraid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Because they made the poor and uneducated afraid. That’s why all the guns. Fear of that which they do not understand. They were fed endless propaganda about how Trump cares for the working class. Republican Corporate media let them keep their guns as long as they had an enemy to point them at that wasn’t them. Keep them scared and afraid of their allies, their fellow working class.

  • KMAMURI@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    Wake up. Your courts haven’t been able to help you long before the cheeto was in power and was flaunting his many felonies. The courts literally gave him unlimited power already. There have been zero repercussions for him his entire life while you all cheered him on and brought him to power not once but twice.

    • andrewta@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      In 2022 there were 161.42 million eligible voters in the US (latest number I could find)

      Trump got 77,284,118 votes

      There is 340.1 million people in the US.

      I’d say that far from all.

      But otherwise yeah I already know the Supreme Court pretty much gave him unlimited power.

      • KMAMURI@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 minutes ago

        Yes all. No one stood up or this guy would not be in office. Like you said above only 77,000,000 voted for him. And the other 263 million allowed those few fascist lovers even have a say.

        He was honest and open (oddly enough) about his plans for dictatorship years in advance. Your complete society allowed this to happen. No one could have stopped it but the citizens of your country. No one can still stop it but you. Yet in years of knowing no one has organized any resistance at all. Again allowing it to happen.

        He put his Nazi goons in your capitol buildings and still no one did anything. He stacked your top court with fellow fascists. He was convicted of dozens of crimes. He’s flaunted the law his entire life. He’s been a grifter and a cheat his entire life but you all have him one of the most popular tv shows of its time and thus a very loud voice within your celebrity culture that dominates your news cycles. You propped up his celebrity status and cheered him on for being a dickhead to people. You’ve watched him openly destroy his own businesses and bank accounts on whims multiple times yet remain extremely wealthy. No one did anything the entire time. You continue to put celebrities on pedestals and declare them higher than the rest of society because they’re famous and rich and gwne they do things that affect or harm others they are allowed to walk free because they’re famous. But you made them that way, only you can stop it.

        Yes I blame American society as a whole, and that includes you, for encouraging and allowing this to happen from the very beginning.

  • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Court: issues order

    Trump Admin: flat out says they will not follow the orders

    Court: I don’t think the admin is following my orders.

  • GuyFawkes@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I’ve got an idea! Let’s sit around jerking each other off for two weeks while we build a case that Trump will just ignore anyways! Who’s with me (besides the Court)???

  • Lucky_777@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Give them two weeks to do something. We’ll see, then what if they don’t provide? Another 2 weeks? They will just say he is dead or died in transit and it’s out of their hands. Then what happens? Let me guess.

    Fucking nothing.

    • kandoh@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      They have the Marshals, and the judge could indeed order a government official arrested.

      • themadcodger@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        In sane times, yes. But US Marshals are a part of the Dept of Justice, which answers to the Executive. So I’ll let you guess how that would play out if they were ordered to arrest Trump or anyone else in his circle.

        • drcabbage@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 minutes ago

          The court needs to do this and see what happens. A civil war may be the only way out of this.