Top Trump official Stephen Miller’s recent declaration that anyone who “preaches hate for America” will face deportation has ignited alarm online, with critics warning the statement disregards First Amendment protections.

Social media users and legal analysts raised immediate concerns, pointing out that expressing dissent or criticism of the government is protected under the First Amendment. Some worried the administration was veering into authoritarian territory.

The backlash has reignited broader debates over the limits of free speech, especially as civil liberties fall under scrutiny. While immigration enforcement remains a core theme of President Donald Trump’s platform, critics are increasingly questioning whether rhetoric like Miller’s is a precursor to more aggressive suppression of dissent.

    • Snowclone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It wasn’t. At all. And you can clearly see armed people aren’t lining up to stop a clearly lawless authoritarian tyrant from holding power over them.

  • laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    “Veering into authoritarian territory”?! They set course for that the moment he was sworn in and floored it, have you not been paying attention?!

  • Prethoryn Overmind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Some worried the administration was veering into an authoritarian territory.

    Yeah no fucking shit. It has been happening since he got into office you fucking dipshits.

  • opus86
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    After all the stuff Stephen Miller pulled during Trumps first term, I can’t believe no one made sure he couldn’t do it again. Apparently, I’m an idiot for thinking someone would hold him accountable.

  • Ledericas@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    kinda like how SA have banned LGBTq, immediately deports people if they come out.

  • Fireduck@lem.trashbrain.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Skipping the first amendment would be making some speech illegal. With like a law and courts. They are also skipping the 5th, which would be due process.

  • p3n@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I can hardly believe that we have devolved so far, so quickly. We are literally one step away from becoming an authoritarian dictatorship. The plan is this:

    1. Deport (and by deport, they mean imprison for life) immigrants. These immigrants will mostly be legitimately illegal and gang associated criminals, but there will be a few individuals with legal standing and no criminal records. This could simply be the result of denying due process, or it could be an intentional test. The important factor is that 5th Amendment Due process rights are denied to all of them. The fact that these people (but be sure to de-humanize them as much as possible) are immigrants will be the distracting factor. <---- We are here

    2. Deport (and by deport, they mean imprison for life) criminals. These will be legitimate criminals with legitimately horrible records; that will be the distracting issue that will be made the focus of the argument: “They are serial killers, rapists, pedophiles, we don’t want them here, so we should get rid of them.” This has already been announced as the plan: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUfrwWz-m5I . That is not the point! The point is that they are still U.S. citizens, despite their crimes. The significance of this is that it will be the final barrier that needs to be broken, and the final protection that must be dismantled for the final solution to be enacted. If no one steps up and successfully defends the constitutional rights of these American citizens, then all the pieces will be in place for step 3.

    3. Deport (and by deport, they mean imprison for life) political dissidents, rivals, business opponents, and maybe just anyone the administration doesn’t like. If they are political dissidents they will claim that they have committed crimes like, “hate speech against America™”, if they are a minority, they will be “associated with gangs”, if they are business rivals it will have committed “economic terrorism”, or something like that. It doesn’t really matter because they eliminated due process in step 1 (remember that was the important factor, not the immigrant dis-tractor), and without due process they don’t have to prove any crimes. Our last defense would have been the simple fact that we are American Citizens, but we established that doesn’t matter in step 2 because they were “bad people”, but now the “bad people” are whoever the administration decides is bad.

    The context of the 5th amendment is important to understand its intent:

    Historically, the Fifth Amendment draws significant influence from English common law. The grand jury clause specifically dates back to the Magna Carta, and was designed to protect accused persons from prosecution by the English royalty. In keeping with that intention, the Constitution’s framers opted to adapt the grand jury to the Constitution, so as to protect citizens from prosecution by the federal government.
    Reagan Library

    Even in a Monarchy, which is not the form of government we are supposed to have, the Magna Carta offered protections against the King from prosecuting commoners, which is the origin of this amendment. We aren’t just devolving to pre-revolution America, which had enough disagreements with the rule of King George III that it sparked a war…no we are devolving to a pre-Magna Carta England type of Government. We are descending into middle-age feudalism with complete authoritarian rule… and we aren’t fortunate enough to have a dictator like Alfred the Great.

  • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Why do Americans still talk about the constitution like it means something or is still relevant?

    Your constitution is GONE. It’s a historical artifact. It has no meaning in today’s America.

    All that matters now is the whim of the emotional toddler in the White House. Get used to it. He’s not going until he’s dead.

    • KMAMURI@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      They can’t grasp that they will have to pick up arms to get their country back and they’ll fight you about it too.

    • BlackSheep@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      And PP is having wet dreams about destroying Canada in the same way. FFS Get out and vote!!!

      • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        On trump’s new voting machines with back end processing via musk’s starlink. Like I say, he’s not going till he’s dead.

  • Match!!@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    11 hours ago

    america means freedom and diversity and immigrants. the trump administration hates america

    • RootAccess@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      As we all know, a person defines themselves through their actions. So does a country.

      Imho, saying Trump(ism) isn’t America is like people who do evil, but still think they are good people. Admitting you have a problem is the first step in getting better. You need to hate what America has become. Shifting the blame to the current administration just lets people feel good about themselves. They shouldn’t. There is work to do.

      The second step is meeting up with others in your community already working to fix it.

      • intheformbelow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Yep. At least 30% of americans supported this maga crap while the majority did nothing to stop him. As a Canadian, I’m not going to distinguish between those who supported trump and those who didn’t care enough to stop him. Both are equally responsible, and both must pay the price. Personally, i’m hoping the price will be so great that the US will split apart. Of course, Canada alone won’t make the US disappear, but the world united against the US absolutely will.