• supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 day ago

    Rank Of Preferences of what I would most prefer to do after reading this, starting with most preferred!

    1. be shot by a firing squad
    2. die by lethal injection
    3. visit south carolina
  • Zacryon@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Barbaric idiots.

    Death penalties don’t help to fight crime, as has been proven over and over again.

  • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ve had several surgeries in my life that required a general anesthetic. There is no excuse or justification, other than sadism, for suffering here. Shouldn’t have the death penalty in the first place.

  • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I find all forms of capital retribution to be barbaric, in addition to having the problem of killing potentially innocent people. Add to that it’s hard to argue that a justice-system can even exist when a prosecutor can just dangle the death penalty over a defendants head if they don’t sign a plea.

    -With all of that in mind I’ve always found the idea of a firing squad to be the least unappealing option out of all of the multiple unappealing options. Guns were specifically designed to effectively kill people with hundreds of years of iteration built into them. Our military and our Allies military sometimes even use them to kill children. a skilled shooter and a stationary target can make it quick. -At least, that’s what I can imagine.

  • WorldsDumbestMan
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I fould prefer this over drowning in lung fluid, or being slowly electrocuted also.

    Heck, execution is preferable to how the average person lives their lives.

    • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I remember seeing some war footage or something of a guy being executed from a meter away by a truck mounted .50 caliper gun. His head just disappeared. After my initial, holy shit! why did I just watch that, I thought, I can’t think of a better way to go. Minus the buildup.

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        personally I don’t believe in an afterlife. I do believe that once your organs cease to function your brains gets a cocktail boost that sets you into a fast dreamlike state. think of it like a naturally induced coma that you might never wake up from.

        in this state is when you have your “afterlife”. I believe it’s an evolved trait that allows the brain to survive as long as possible after a traumatic death.

        In my perspective, shooting a person in the head is just about the worst thing you can do because it robs them of those final moments where they could possibly live out an entire lifetime.

        I would much rather die naturally, but will gladly take a slow painful death that will guarantee me my final moments instead of a “blip you’re dead forever” moment.

          • JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            20 hours ago

            You’re entitled to your own personal beliefs, but you should know that your belief is inconsistent with the current scientific understanding of biology and consciousness.

              • JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                The human brain is a biological machine comprised of a very large number of simple components that follow the laws of physics. Some combinations of those components interacting in a certain way results in what we consider to be consciousness, but it’s still just a chemical reaction based on purely physical processes. When a brain’s components stop interacting in that way, its consciousness ceases to exist.

        • WorldsDumbestMan
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I believe that as soon as you are dead, your consciousness ends until the next time it is back. And since over an infinite amount of time, anything is inevitable. I am very afraid to die, because I’m afraid I won’t stay dead. But yeah, I don’t see why they waste chemicals, or electricity when bullets are cheap and humane.

    • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      It is said that it has to be both {cruel && unusual} simultaneously to be unconstitutional. The more they carry out these “new methods” like nitrogen gassing the more ‘usual’ it becomes.

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        well no, nitrogen gassings aren’t “cruel”, they’re novel.

        What they mean when they say cruel and unusual is some shit like strapping a guy into a 2007 camry, sending it down a mountain into a fucking lake, until he drowns.

          • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            21 hours ago

            no, it’s just an example of something that would be considered both cruel, and unusual punishment, to provide a sufficient example.

            You can’t just look at something like nitrogen gassing and go “its cruel because it’s killing someone, and also unusual because it isn’t utilized often” It has to be literally cruel, as in, you shouldn’t do it period (general US laws would forbid it kind of a thing) and unusual in the sense that you would literally never do it.

        • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Oh, hypothetically speaking, I’m not even certain that would qualify as cruel & unusual anymore if they were to run out of alternatives.

  • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I can’t wait until we go back to stoning or burning at the stake. The US is going to undo the entire Reformation period.

  • Gurei@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    2 days ago

    Three bullets shot by a three man squad. State can’t even afford more men and a conscience round.

  • arrow74@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    Honestly much better than lethal injection. Lethal injection is slow and tortuous but looks less violent.

    I’d rather be give a fuck ton of herion and ran over with a bulldozer. If that’s not available chop my head off

    • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      It sounds pretty freakin cruel to me but I’ll just post this quote and link:

      source: Discover

      “The physician concluded based on his observations that a severed head could retain consciousness for 25 to 30 seconds.”

      • arrow74@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’d assume with the spine severed like that you wouldn’t feel much pain.

        Plus with lethal injection it’s common for it to take hours. Just sitting their slowly drowning as your lungs fill with fluid. I’ll take the 25 to 30 seconds

    • Geetnerd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’m convinced lethal injection was intentionally designed to be agony, and torture. There are too many accounts by eyewitnesses of it not being peaceful, and painless.

      • Epialtes@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Létal injection work well in theory

        The problem is, skilled people don’t want to do it. And pharmaceutical companies don’t want their products used in it. So it’s done by unskilled people with a reduced access to products.

      • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        49
        ·
        2 days ago

        Afaik the process itself is fine, but it involves things like starting an IV and dosing, and people who are skilled in those kinds of things tend not to be the kind of people who are okay with assisting in an execution. So, the ones who end up doing it are basically cops with a syringe, and -big shock- fuck it up cuz they’re either too stupid to do it correctly or too evil to want to.

        • SirEDCaLot
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          I think this applies more widely than just doctors. As a pilot, I could design an execution protocol using nitrogen that would be dirt cheap and totally painless. Any other pilot could write the same one. But I wouldn’t do it, not if you paid me a million dollars. There are too many cases of innocent people getting executed, so I want nothing to do with any of it. Our judicial system is good, but it is not good enough to be relied on for taking life. So I would do nothing to help justify or condone or make tolerable the act of executing prisoners.

          Also, this execution is a perfect example. Three bullets to the heart should kill someone dead in seconds. But the article mentions him crying out and flexing for the better part of a minute. That makes me think all three executioners missed the heart, perhaps on purpose.

      • Maeve@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        Mainly because the drugs administered as anesthesia and loss of consciousness weren’t enough and people botched them in myriad ways, from my current understanding.

        • SirEDCaLot
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Exactly. The protocol was written by somebody with no medical training. So the first drug knocks the person out, the second drug paralyzes them, and the third drug stops the heart. Problem is, the third drug if given to a conscious person is incredibly painful. This created situations where the first drug was dosed wrong, so the person woke up but was unable to move.

          Lethal injection could be much better done with a single drug system, like a massive overdose of barbiturates, but I think there is an unspoken desire to avoid any death that might be considered 'pleasant". Which to be honest is completely barbaric in my opinion.

        • Geetnerd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          You’re not seeing the forest for the trees.

          It was ALWAYS intended to not be enough.

    • jeffw@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      2 days ago

      The fucked up thing is that both of them CHOSE this. That’s how bad lethal injection can be

      • Ledericas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        also the companies are in europe so they started to stop giving it to the USA.

  • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    24 hours ago

    He chose this method? Are people THAT scared of needles that they’d prefer getting shot?

  • tal
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanging_in_the_United_States

    Currently, only New Hampshire has a law specifying hanging as an available secondary method of execution, now only applicable to one person, who was sentenced to capital punishment by the state prior to its repeal in 2019.

    The hanging of Billy Bailey is likely to be the final hanging in the United States, considering that all three of the states that maintained hanging as a secondary method of execution alongside lethal injection after the 1976 restoration of the death penalty have now abolished executions. Delaware’s Supreme Court declared the death penalty to be in violation of their state constitution in 2016,[21] Washington abolished executions in 2018,[22] and New Hampshire abolished executions in 2019.[23] However, the last person on death row in the three states is Michael K. Addison in New Hampshire, convicted in 2008 of the 2006 murder of Michael Briggs, an on-duty police officer. Should the state carry out Addison’s execution, the method could be hanging if lethal injection was found unconstitutional or inefficient, or if he chooses to be executed by hanging.

    Talk about a go-down-in-the-history-books opportunity.