you called them ‘cretins’ which is an ableist insult, and I said I don’t think they’re from Crete. I was not saying that being from Crete is a disability, I was pointing out your insult
If it “Takes one to know one”, then you are not merely affirming that I’m vile and cretinous, you are also necessarily affirming that my recognition of the .ml admins as vile and cretinous is correct by regarding my qualities as necessarily granting me insight as to whether or not the admins share said qualities.
I understand that might be too complex for you to parse on short notice, considering your previous difficulty with discerning the meaning of plainly stated reasons in the form of the written word regarding the 196 issue, but I’m sure that if you sit and ponder it for a few hours, it might eventually click.
I thought you were trying to say it was an insult based on some form of nationality. You did, after all, say, and I quote
Unless being from Crete is a disability, you didn’t point out, real or attempted, anything regarding ableism.
you called them ‘cretins’ which is an ableist insult, and I said I don’t think they’re from Crete. I was not saying that being from Crete is a disability, I was pointing out your insult
Implying that being from Crete is a disability, which it is not.
Maybe try being less cretinous.
we already established if you were calling them from Crete it would be Cretans, you’re just insulting them and now me.
you’re really not doing much to disprove my original point tbh
Correct, which is why your objection was baseless.
I never denied insulting them. The .ml admins are absolutely vile and cretinous.
if so then it surely takes one to know one
So we’re in agreement that the .ml admins are vile and cretinous. :)
I’m not sure you’re taking my meaning. if you’re willing to insult people like that it says more about you than them
If it “Takes one to know one”, then you are not merely affirming that I’m vile and cretinous, you are also necessarily affirming that my recognition of the .ml admins as vile and cretinous is correct by regarding my qualities as necessarily granting me insight as to whether or not the admins share said qualities.
I understand that might be too complex for you to parse on short notice, considering your previous difficulty with discerning the meaning of plainly stated reasons in the form of the written word regarding the 196 issue, but I’m sure that if you sit and ponder it for a few hours, it might eventually click.
Your original point showing that you know nothing about the 196 split and that you baselessly spread slander about 196 not respecting neopronouns?
That original point is already long disproven.