• Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    we already established if you were calling them from Crete it would be Cretans, you’re just insulting them and now me.

    you’re really not doing much to disprove my original point tbh

    • PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      we already established if you were calling them from Crete it would be Cretans,

      Correct, which is why your objection was baseless.

      you’re just insulting them and now me.

      I never denied insulting them. The .ml admins are absolutely vile and cretinous.

        • PugJesus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          if so then it surely takes one to know one

          So we’re in agreement that the .ml admins are vile and cretinous. :)

          • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            5 days ago

            I’m not sure you’re taking my meaning. if you’re willing to insult people like that it says more about you than them

            • PugJesus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              5 days ago

              If it “Takes one to know one”, then you are not merely affirming that I’m vile and cretinous, you are also necessarily affirming that my recognition of the .ml admins as vile and cretinous is correct by regarding my qualities as necessarily granting me insight as to whether or not the admins share said qualities.

              I understand that might be too complex for you to parse on short notice, considering your previous difficulty with discerning the meaning of plainly stated reasons in the form of the written word regarding the 196 issue, but I’m sure that if you sit and ponder it for a few hours, it might eventually click.

              • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                5 days ago

                if so then it surely takes one to know one

                I draw the line at ableist insult, but if you want to insult people like that I’m just going to assume you’re doing so from a position of experience.

                I can see why you have such a hard time with people offering real-world advice like ‘dont try to force others people to change their opinions’

                • PugJesus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  I draw the line at ableist insult, but if you want to insult people like that I’m just going to assume you’re doing so from a position of experience.

                  If it’s an ableist insult, like you claim, wouldn’t that mean you’re insulting me on ableist terms?

                  • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    5 days ago

                    hardly, I’m just pointing out that you’re clearly speaking as the most authoritative person on the subject

    • PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      you’re really not doing much to disprove my original point tbh

      Your original point showing that you know nothing about the 196 split and that you baselessly spread slander about 196 not respecting neopronouns?

      That original point is already long disproven.