• finder@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I love that over on Reddit most of the content is still coming from Xitter. The only change is that they aren’t posting direct links crediting the person who made it.

    What a half-ass way to boycott a site.

  • massi1008@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The only problem I have with x alternatives currently (both Bluesky and Mastodon) is that my favourite r34 artists havent really switched plattforms :(

    • Cat@ponder.cat
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      I get what you are saying, but you should try Chimera Linux.

    • 1984
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      We are racists when it comes to operating systems. No windows allowed at home.

      Maybe we need a term for this. What do the gender focused Lemmy crowd think is a good term for not accepting windows.

      Windophobic?

    • Chloé 🥕@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I’d rather have the unsolicited linux advice tbh

      but anyways that’s not super relevant because there very much is still racism on lemmy…

      • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Are the rumours about Arch being too hard true? If someone’s experienced with Debian and Fedora, will they find Arch too hard?

        • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          It’s not really difficult but as far as i remember, you have to configure everything yourself, which can be tiring. Depends on your mood though, if you’re into configuring your own linux system, then i guess Arch is perfect for you.

        • JackbyDev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          I think vanilla Arch is daunting to get going because it drops you in with so little to start with. Once you’re past that I think it’s fine. Especially if you’re already used to Debian and Fedora. Sure, you’ll need to learn to use pacman (Arch’s package manager) and it is a little confusing at times, but there’s a ton of great advice for it online, including the Arch wiki.

          I highly suggest EndeavourOS. It’s basically Arch with a better install process. Once its done you’ll have a desktop environment and browser. I’m using CachyOS which is similar but has a little but more stuff, but it’s still Arch. Like you, I’m very confident with other Linux OSes but was wary of Arch. Turns out people have good solutions to get over that worst hurdle nowadays (the original install and getting a desktop environment).

          Also, unlike other derivative distributions like Ubuntu to Debian and Manjaro to Arch, EndeavourOS really is just Arch. It’s just a nicer install process.

        • ugo@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Ime, not really. It feels daunting the first time, but the installation guide on the wiki is actually really good at holding your hand through it.

          Just be careful not to skip any sections

          • Pope-King Joe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Plus now there’s an installation script that is really good for basic installs. Takes about 10 minutes now.

  • fnrir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    10 hours ago

    basically me, but there opposite when Musky Husky took over:

    “Urgh. Racism in my porn app?”

  • RangerJosey@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I keep it to quickly check service outages.

    Xbox, crunchy, Netflix, etc down? Check Twitter. If a bunch of people are talking about it. It’s down. If not then it’s probably a local thing with my ISP.

  • cley_faye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    So true. Two years ago I still used twitter for nsfw content, but even that got weird (and really suspicious sometimes).

    This is why we can’t have nice things.

  • will_a113@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I never understood people posting porn to microblogging sites. What’s the point of this? There are literally millions of other places to get porn already, it’s like what the Internet was invented for.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      It’s like a little more curated. Plus it can be interactive. There are nsfw activities that you can’t do on porn sites.

    • Foxfire@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      8 hours ago

      But how else will you hear about all the little details of their daily lives on a regular porn site? The parasocial connections to your favorite porn stars aren’t gonna form all by themselves!

      • GuitarSon2024@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 hours ago

        You joke but the sad thing is that this is how OF content creators drum up the most business. They prey on giving lonely/intimacy challenged people some sort of subconscious feeling of hope and connection to someone else inside a screen. Why else would you pay for prawn? It’s literally free all over the internet.

    • normalexit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      10 hours ago

      It’s usually there so people seek out the only fans / subscription content. Additionally for general exposure (ha!), likes and followers.

    • stebo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 hours ago

      i thought it was just women promoting their onlyfans like they do on Reddit and really any social media

    • makyo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I’ve read that it used to be a great place for really niche stuff. BUT your point still stands because I’m really not sure why that would be. Maybe the interface or something lent itself to that well or maybe it just hit the right moment and took off.

      • peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I think it’s because of the advertising system. Once you stumble onto one of them, you get the “content makers” retweeting eachother. It doesn’t cost them a dime to retweet someone else’s post, and if you retweet, you’re gonna get retweeted.

        I’m still convinced there are some women I know that have/had an only fans (because of sudden changes to living quality without job promotions or other new sources of income). But this system also benefits them, if it is niche stuff like feet for instance, you’ll never find them, and you’ll never know it if you did. If it’s “normal stuff” (good luck getting me to define that, I have no fucking clue anymore) most “content makers” hide their identities pretty well, and I’d bet money that there are unspoken agreements between them to assist in keeping it that way.