• Someone@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    It shouldn’t make a difference, and I think this would set a terrible precedent, but I have much less of an issue with special treatment for players than for “VIPs”. The only way I’d truly be ok with this is if FIFA paid to have increased capacity and/or some kind of lasting improvement to the hospital. But we all know with FIFA’s track record their more likely to demand the hospital pay them for the privilege to and publicity from treating their executives.

  • skozzii@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s crazy to ask for quicker treatment because of status, instead of medical need.

    More shameful behavior from FIFA.

    They have enough money, bring some doctors with you.

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      22 hours ago

      But he is clearly rolling on the floor in agony clutching his shin, it must be a priority case.

    • Nik282000@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I am shocked that FIFA, the most upstanding, uncorruptible pillar of moral fiber, would use their untarnished reputation to obtain preferential treatment.

      Tell them to take their tournament down south, we have enough problems with millionaires disrupting this country.

  • yannic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    3 days ago

    I work in healthcare. This already happens. The problem is with codifying it.

  • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    3 days ago

    As much as I dislike private health care, for something like an international sports tournament I almost think fifa should just give a bunch of cash to the health ministry so they can have extra overtime staff on shift, and those staff can treat normal patients during that period unless they are needed for the athletes. That way everyone benefits and it all stays within the bounds of the normal system here.

    • cdf12345@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 days ago

      Doesn’t it go beyond funding for staff? Like if there are limited X-rays machines and a player needs X-rays because they maybe broke something vs a kid who fell isn’t this plan forcing the kid to suffer or wait longer so that the athlete can go first? That’s the real problematic slippery slope of the issue I believe.

      • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 days ago

        Most of the machines are limited by staff, not equipment in terms of overall load. They may be fully in use during peak times, but that’s mostly because it’s convenient to book people for non urgent appointments during the day.

        I was in the ER for 14 hours a month ago waiting to see the doctor, but I had my xray within 20 minutes of arriving at triage, and a CT within a half hour of a doctor looking at the xray and deciding I needed more imaging.

        It’s the same thing with things like operating rooms.

        • blindsight@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Same experience for me on the other side of the country in small-town BC. I had a minor non-urgent issue that needed imaging. I just walked in and got it done immediately after my doctor appointment. It took me as long for me to change into the hospital flasher “clothing” as I spent in the waiting room.