Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful youā€™ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutā€™nā€™paste it into its own post ā€” thereā€™s no quota for posting and the bar really isnā€™t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many ā€œesotericā€ right wing freaks, but thereā€™s no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iā€™m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged ā€œculture criticsā€ who write about everything but understand nothing. Iā€™m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyā€™re inescapable at this point, yet I donā€™t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnā€™t be surgeons because they didnā€™t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canā€™t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

Last weekā€™s thread

(Semi-obligatory thanks to @dgerard for starting this)

  • o7___o7@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    Ā·
    18 days ago

    Talk with PM went nowhere. Very nice guy, but was insistent on giving the reviewer the benefit of the doubt. I just wanna die.

    • self@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      Ā·
      17 days ago

      oof, Iā€™m sorry. itā€™s so hard to get capitalists to understand the nature of what theyā€™re enabling, especially if it seems to be working in the short term. itā€™s the most frustrating thing during a bubble ā€” it taints every decision the executive class makes, and enables grifters to get away with obvious shit even over objections from people who know better.

    • nightsky@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      Ā·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      Ugh, from me as well: sorry to hear that.

      I can relate to how you feel about the AI stuff. I also work for GenAI-pilled upper management, and the forced introduction of github copilot is coming soon. It will make us all super extra productive! ā€¦they say. Dreading it already. I wonā€™t use it at all, Iā€™ve already made that clear to my superior. But my colleagues might use it, and then I will have to review the AI slopā€¦ uggghhā€¦

      Maybe a small silver lining to raise the mood here, recent article from Monday: Gartner sounds alarm on AI cost, data challenges

      If even freaking Gartner is now saying ā€œwell, maybe AI is too expensive and not actually so usefulā€ā€¦ then maybe the world of management will wisen up as well, soon, hopefully, maybe?

      • froztbyte@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        Ā·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        an idea I just had (which would need some work but talking hypothetical): wouldnā€™t it be lovely if IDEs VS Code[0] automatically inserted ā€œCopilot Used Hereā€ start/end markers around all generated shit. could even make it a styleguide/editorconfig so itā€™s universally set across projects[1]

        [0] - because lol ofc itā€™s mainly vscode rn

        [1] - and then when you find colleagues who lie about whether theyā€™re using it you wrap all their desk shit in foil

        • nightsky@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          Ā·
          16 days ago

          I like the idea. Or maybe marking such changes in the commit messageā€¦ I might try to bring that up when the time comes.

          • froztbyte@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            Ā·
            16 days ago

            in the current most-typical mode of engagement, commit messages are too disconnected from the actual contents. it requires someone who gives a shit to go looking

            conversely, what I mean is something like ā€œa hook that guarantees that the moment the plugin is engaged and output from it is scribed in source, metadata about that event is simultaneously co-writtenā€

            itā€™s already generating a pile of other things, it may as well generate timestamps and callsig and callhash and shit tooā€¦

            the number one problem with this, of course, is that itā€™s going to be extremely unpopular with a Vocal Set Of People who rely on this shit to make themselves look good