I’ll go first. Mine is the instant knockout drug. Like Dexter’s intramuscular injection that causes someone to immediately lose consciousness. Or in the movie Split where there’s the aerosol spray in your face that makes you instantly unconscious. Or pretty much any time someone uses chloroform.

  • EnderMB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Star Trek is awful for this, but this conversation:

    Subject Matter Expert: Oh no, the defences are down

    Captain: How long do you need to fix them?

    SME: Two hours

    Captain: You have one

    No, motherfucker, the person that you fucking PAY for their expertise on this very subject said it would take two hours!

    Management is full of these cunts that think they can just dictate a timeline and have people that actually know their shit dance to their tune.

    • Schal330@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Hate to be that guy, but the federation exists in a post-money society. No one gets paid, they do what they do for prestige, pride, adventure, and the good of humanity. Maybe the management believe they can inspire their minions to do better, or maybe the SME’s are so used to that shit that they under promise and over deliver.

      SME: “oh no, our defences are down” Captain: “How long do you need to fix them?” SME: (hmm, captain will cut the time in half, it takes about 15 minutes…fuck it…) “Two hours” Captain: “You have one” SME: (Like candy from a baby)

    • Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 days ago

      But also if you know anything about engineering, it’s double your expected timeline just in case Shit Happens™️. I can fairly safely predict delivery in two hours. I might be able to deliver in one. Under-promise and over-deliver, or risk vice versa.

    • Zozano@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      “Okay so the installer says it’s got nine minutes left, so this step should take about three or four minutes”

    • Brosplosion@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Honestly this happens a lot. Generally people give estimates reflecting other responsibilities when cutting time is possible

  • Don_alForno@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    4 days ago

    Knights getting stabbed with swords through plate armor.

    We’re re-watching GoT and were at the Brienne/Jaime fight on the bridge, and I was just yelling at the screen. He’s in rags and she’s in plate, both wielding swords, he doesn’t have a snowballs’ chance in hell if she protects her head and just tackles him. That’s what the fucking armor is for! Coincidentally that also would be way more likely to achieve her goal to subdue but not hurt him.

    • ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      In the opening sequence of Final Fantasy XII, two separate characters get stabbed through the “stylish” gaps in their armor… and somehow this doesn’t prompt anyone else to reconsider their armor choices.

  • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    The worst is when a show or movie establishes that X can’t be done, because Y. Then in a later scene X is done without addressing anything about Y. It’s actually pretty common, especially when run time needs to be padded with a side quest.

  • Stepos Venzny@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Ever try holding your breath for as long as a TV or movie character is getting smothered to death? It’s not even uncomfortable.

    • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      YES, another one of mine. To be fair though, most TV shows and movies don’t have the time to dedicate to an actual strangling or suffocation. Those things take a while.

      Funny story. I took my dad to Saving Private Ryan. After the movie was over and we’re walking away he turned to me and said…

      “You know the actual D-Day took a lot longer than that.”

  • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Movies that need to exposition dump to tell the audience what’s going on. This isn’t radio. If you need to explain everything to me so I can understand what’s going on in the plot, it’s bad story telling. Show, don’t tell.

    • barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 days ago

      Writers just toss in some jarringly unrealistic dialogue that people never say IRL to establish characters are siblings.

    • Zozano@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I heard Outlander is great, but I can’t get past the second episode because the narration pissed me off.

      Okay, I get it, it’s based off a novel, but if you’re inserting a monologue to explain what just happened, or foreshadowing what is about to happen, you can just fuck off.

      “Little did I know, this blunder would cost me everything” fuck off

      • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Watch Mad Max Fury Road “theatrical” release then watch the original or director’s cut. I watched the original in theaters the day the movie came out and loved it! But I rewatched it on streaming and thought I was going crazy with the Tom Hardy narration they added in the begin and end. I was like, was that added between the time I watched in theater and now? Looked it up and the production company forced them to add the narration a couple weeks into the release. Apparently an executive couldn’t follow the story without Max telling him. Shows that the people in charge don’t always know what’s best.

  • Skvlp@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    5 days ago

    When the driver of a car is looking more at the passenger they’re talking to than the road. Probably a dead giveaway that the scene is shot with green screen or the car being towed on the back of a truck.

    • davidagain@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      4 days ago

      I used to hate it when people kept wobbling the steering wheel around when driving in a clearly straight road but then Top Gear had an episode featuring some American cars from the 1980s and constantly correcting the steering was necessary because there was so much loose play in the system!

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      My friend’s mom when I was a kid used to look at us in the back seat for minutes at a time while driving. She said she used the lines behind the car to stay in the lane. It scared the shit out of us, but somehow she never got into an accident. Granted, these were long, straight, country roads, not NYC streets.

    • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I mean with the complexity of shooting in a moving car I have to wonder if it’s ever done now (in all but the most extreme necessity).

      • _HELLO@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        On any union tv show or movie in the United States, all driving sequences are either in a studio shot with a green screen or a virtual stage, or they are shot with a “process trailer” where somebody else pulls the car.

        It is very much illegal to have an actor “act” while driving, though in the low budget indie world you might find productions or cast willing to risk it in some way.

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 days ago

        All they need to do to solve the problem is make sure to focus on the road. They don’t need to actually be driving, just act like they are driving by looking at the road more than their passenger.

        • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Well that’s to solve the appearance, but I’m commenting with an actual physical car, on a closed road, being towed or not, etc. Don’t need the bother when you can green screen it.

  • barsquid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 days ago

    When the protagonist isn’t actually doing anything or making any decisions, but mostly reacting to events that happen.

  • phanto@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    5 days ago

    Hearing the exact wrong part of the conversation, and then making a horrific assumption and spinning off into zany misunderstandings instead of, just, “Hey, what did I just hear?”

  • Ulvain@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    4 days ago

    Whenever the plot entirely revolves on avoidable misunderstandings from character that nothing in the story prevents from having a clarifying chat. It’s weak storytelling.

    Also whenever the characters don’t react to enormous thing A because advancing the story requires them to immediately ask about thing B.

    Lastly whenever you end up screaming at the tv “you have enough clues to call for backup” or “enough reason to worry to call 911” yet they proceed alone. Bad writing.

    • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 days ago

      “We don’t have time (to explain why were doing this)”

      Proceeds to have time to do dozens of other useless things

    • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I feel like there’s a lot of script writers that want the emotional wrenchingness of “this character’s personality and history means that they will never see the simple solution” but have no idea how to actually pull it off.

      Breaking Bad pulls this off wonderfully multiple times, where the “right” decision is right there but for the character to be able to do it, they couldn’t be who we’ve learned them to be so far.

      But most directors amd scriptwriters are nowhere near that level.

  • Wolf314159@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    4 days ago

    Explosive decompression in space. It seems to always last forever, suck EVERYTHING out, even if it’s a tiny hole through which a giant xenomorph is liquified. The delta P is like one atmosphere, pathetic really.

    Then there’s noise in space.

  • Taleya@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    4 days ago

    Idiot balling. If your plot hinges on everyone suddenly being incompetent af, having the emotional maturity of a hamster or leaving out key details without reason, you fucking suck at writing

    • socsa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      4 days ago

      Honestly this is far more believable ever since Donald Trump became a viable politician. It sure does seem like there is no bottom to the well of human stupidity these days

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        4 days ago

        Having idiotic characters is one thing. Having otherwise-competent characters suddenly become idiotic because the plot doesn’t work otherwise is what’s bad.

  • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    People getting shot with a shitty handgun and they’re dead as soon as they hit the ground. Even if its a fatal shot, chances are quite high you’re going to die minutes or hours or days later if you make it to a hospital.

    People hiding behind cars from bullets. Bullets being shot at the car and somehow not hitting them. Only the engine block could stop most bullets.

    • ChicagoCommunist [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      Guns in general are a lost cause at this point. Even shooting a 22 outside is doing hearing damage, but plots rely on people shooting 9s and 45s indoors and having normal conversations immediately afterwards.

      A 22 can penetrate all the way through a car and still be dangerous

      Anything but a direct hit on the head or heart is going to take at least a minute for someone to die. Conversely, the chance of dying from a non-lethal shot (or having lifelong complications), even to an appendage, is nonzero.

      At the same time, getting hit by most calibers isn’t gonna knock someone down or blast them back like they got hit by a car. Human skin is soft, very little energy is transferred into the body’s mass as the bullet travels through.

      • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        People shooting guns in a car and then continuing their conversation…

        You would be deaf.

  • zgasma@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    The bad guy that is omniscient and omnipresent. Everywhere you go, oops! There’s the bad guy and he totally kicks your ass and ruins your plans.

    We call it Neganing. He’s the reason I eventually stopped watching the Walking Dead.

    Or like Sylar (from Heroes), where the writers find a baddie they just love too much to kill so the whole show becomes about them.

  • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’m pretty tired of the sanctity of life trope. Especially when the hero kills a thousand henchmen to get to the villain, and then all of the sudden decides it would be wrong to kill a guy who is trying to destroy the world or whatever.

    Also the hostage trope where they point a gun at someone and say “drop your gun” and the hero does so. How fucking stupid are you? Just shoot the guy in the face.

    Also major injuries that take a year to recover from, but somehow Mr. Average guy is running around and fighting 2 minutes later.

    • ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      The problem with this one is that, as a reader/watcher/whatever, it affects your experience even when it doesn’t happen. I was so convinced that Dumbledore was alive at the end of book six. Fell off a balcony? Point of view character gets dragged to the infirmary so we can’t see what happens after that? There’s a phoenix, a bird associated with healing and rebirth, conspicuously singing? That guy is pulling a Gandalf in the next book for sure.

      So I spent the whole next book waiting for the dramatic reveal that never came…