• @Facebones@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    123 minutes ago

    “We’re the good guys, we just think anybody who doesn’t support our person is literally evil and only not supporting our person out of an extremist desire for accelerationism and literally no other reason, and that they are the real evil of this country, not Republicans”

    Yeah democrats are sooooooo different, nuanced, and level headed. 🙄

  • JaggedRobotPubes
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 hour ago

    Https://youtu.be/s7tWHJfhiyo

    Third parties are obviously the way any intelligent person may choose to vote. This video explains why they are currently not viable in America. Ranked choice voting has to come before third parties. It’s not a moral thing, it’s voting math.

  • @CptEnder@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    32 hours ago

    ITT: people skipping over the 39 days bit. Time and place. Let’s save the Republic then we work on everything else.

  • @Mongostein@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    2212 hours ago

    If they spent that energy campaigning for election reform instead of harassing Lemmy users I’d find it more convincing.

  • @Allero
    link
    -12
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Assuming bad faith over everyone who disagrees with you is a first step to fanaticism and vulnerability to external opinion.

    Weaponizing tribe mentality to reach your goals is very bad long-term, and makes yourself susceptible to the same trap.

    Lemmy, unfortunately, is very prone to that. Remember that time people called here for Biden to step down and were downvoted into oblivion? Where were they when he actually stepped down and everyone started cheering for Harris all of a sudden?

    There are valid reasons to NOT vote for the Democratic party in these elections, even if you clearly don’t side with the Republicans.

    • @Chapelgentry@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 hour ago

      The one valid reason not to vote Dem/Repub this cycle has been to not support genocide, which ultimately supports genocide except the voter can dissociate their vote from the outcome. Other than that, I haven’t seen any other valid arguments to vote 3rd party, particularly when looking at what those candidates would do if they won. Holding the presidency with all of Congress against you means you can’t get anything done, so it’s a waste of 4 years.

      The argument of bad faith you’ve made sounds awfully like the beginning of a slippery slope argument.

    • Noooo you aren’t allowed to say that!

      One of the mouth breathing imbeciles who will determine our future based on a confluence of distraction, idiocy, and geography might read it and think they too have a choice!

      Or worse yet enough people might get the idea that their vote is more than just something to throw away. If even 1% of the country grows that way each cycle corporate profits might be threatened at some point!

      Believe the people who sobbed their hideous wretched guts out that we had to support Biden! They’re never wrong On PuRpOsE!

    • @SeattleRain@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 hours ago

      Haha this, libs are so cruel and violent that they can’t possible imagine someone taking a principled stance on genocide.

      These were the same libs decrying the “violence” of broken windows and looting during the George Floyd riots.

      • @Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        4
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        Assuming bad faith over anyone who disagrees with you

        libs are so cruel and violent

        This is what leftist lemmy actually is. Voices of reason being underscored by the very same bad faith assumptions from a “morally superior” position.

        All so you can feel better about the fact that people with your moral standing have zero power here while the rest of us actually try to keep this country from going tits up.

        Do you honestly think the people you label as libs want genocide?

  • FuglyDuck
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6421 hours ago

    Sorry, guys. I’m voting for the only candidate that can end global warming.

  • @MrVilliam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2219 hours ago

    Maybe the most egregious example of this was something I saw yesterday, which was somebody saying “Tim Walz needs to go vegan”. When pressed about why him and not, say, Donald Trump, they said that people on the left and center were more likely to actually be swayed. It wasn’t worth engaging any further, but I thought it was pretty hilarious that they bothered to try to push the 60-year-old VP candidate to go vegan, but not the 40-year-old VP candidate. Like, you know that you’re not pushing the needle for anybody with that post, right?

    It’s about as useless as making a post saying that JD Vance should hang dry his clothes instead of wasting energy running a clothes dryer.

    • @PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      1818 hours ago

      Suggesting it’s easier to convince a Midwestern football coach/car dad to go vegan than an NYC germaphobe is a level of optimism I have never seen

    • Optional
      link
      fedilink
      1718 hours ago

      Look pal, the general said “sow division” amongst whatever socio-political lines we can see, ok? Why Do You Hate Black Vegan Catholics???

      (/s obl.)

  • @2pt_perversion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    27
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    A trolley barrels towards a bunch of construction workers stuck on the tracks.

    • If you pull the first lever it will divert and only kill one person.
    • If you don’t pull the first lever it will kill 100 people, including that one person from before - he’s standing before the track change.
    • But, and now this is key, there is a second lever to the right of the first that says “Display lever only, does nothing.” It does nothing.


    What do you do?

    • @barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      126 hours ago

      I couldn’t possibly pull either lever, that would put blood on my hands! Instead I spend all day on Lemmy urging everyone to pull the display lever. This is different from me touching any levers directly, because reasons.

    • @orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      1820 hours ago

      You blame someone else. It’s definitely not your fault, it definitely cannot be that.

    • @PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      -518 hours ago

      I said throw shit onto the track to try and stop the trolley once.

      The philosophy majors did not like me pointing out it was ridiculous to imagine the problem existing in a void with an absolute limit on possible courses of action.

      They liked it even less when I reminded them that the problem was invented to make fun of them by a philosopher who was arguing that both courses of action were ridiculous conclusions to reach given the broader context of a trolley crash not existing in a vacuum.

      Thought experiments in the void is how we got the declaration that feathers and lead weights were affected by different rates of gravity.

      • @gerbler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        043 minutes ago

        The philosophy majors did not like me pointing out it was ridiculous to imagine the problem existing in a void with an absolute limit on possible courses of action.

        Holy shit you did it! You beat philosophy! ^^^/s

        • @PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          124 minutes ago

          If reminding a bunch of people that trolleys are typically built in places with a lot of stuff that can be thrown on the track is all it takes to “beat” philosophy, then maybe the philosophers didn’t have anything to say worth listening to in the first place.

          Especially when they’re trying to ask questions to determine a moral course of action, why does anyone have to die when some property damage would do the trick just as well?

          That’s why the question was devised in the first place, to illustrate how ridiculous the two schools of thought represented by either decision were when taken to their logical conclusion.

          The original correct answer was to do something more productive than just standing around with your thumb up your ass debating utilitarianism vs not taking a direct action to kill someone.

      • @acid_falcon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        Cool, so if you dont vote for Harris, you’re wasting your vote.

        I also think philosophy is mostly dumb. But there is a vacuum here, shitty democracy or fascism. You can throw shit on the tracks, that just means one less vote against fascism

        • @PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          616 hours ago

          I was talking about the philosophy problem itself not the FPTP vote. As you could probably guess from the context of me dunking on the philosophy majors so much.

  • @almar_quigley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    4823 hours ago

    Where are all the Russian plants, oops I mean true progressives, at to tell us we’re just not leftist or progressive enough and Jill is totally definitely only ever trying to improve things for the country, ignoring her meeting with Putin and aides, and also Kamala is literally no different than Trump! Universalmonk, verdantbanana….i need you to straighten OP out! /s

      • @barsquid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        46 hours ago

        Oh you’ve changed the candidate you’re backing, huh? You are a very serious voter with real principles and values, Mr. Monk.

          • Plum
            link
            fedilink
            1222 hours ago

            Not the hero we deserved, but the hero we needed. Nothing less than a knight, shining…

      • Mossy Feathers (They/Them)
        link
        fedilink
        1423 hours ago

        I was gonna try and write a comment 1upping you because I didn’t think Rachele Fruit was a real person, but then I decided to look her up just to double-check. Nope! She’s actually a real person.

  • HubertManne
    link
    fedilink
    1119 hours ago

    look i have had the choice for with or without lube for half a century now. Thing is saying I don’t want to get sodomized at all just results in the default of without lube. I hate it with lube but I really, really hate it without.

  • @rockSlayer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    15
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    Discouraging 3rd party voting hurts democrats more than anyone. Studies show that 3rd party presidential candidates largely bring out people that would not have voted otherwise and largely benefit the democratic party down-ballot.

    Don’t tell your apolitical friend about how they shouldn’t vote for Cornel. Don’t tell your friend about how voting for a 3rd party is pointless. Don’t tell your friend to vote for your person. Tell them to vote.

    Edit: here’s my receipt.

    Independent voters supported Democratic candidates over Republican candidates, 49% to 47%, according to the exit poll by Edison Research for CNN, ABC, NBC, and CBS. According to the AP VoteCast survey for The Wall Street Journal and Fox News, independents supported Democrats over Republicans, 42% to 38% … While independents nationally voted for Democratic candidates by just 2 points, they supported Arizona Sen. Mark Kelly over Republican challenger Blake Masters by 16 points, Georgia Sen. Raphael Warnock over Republican Herschel Walker by 11 points (in the Nov. 8 election), and, for senator from Pennsylvania, John Fetterman over Republican Mehmet Oz by a whopping 20 points. ( My note on Fetterman, this was before the stroke)

    • @orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      1620 hours ago

      And from a casual perspective, telling people their vote is pointless is (a) a way to show them you’re an asshole, (b) mostly pointless, and © quite possibly true regardless of how they vote.

    • Omega
      link
      fedilink
      622 hours ago

      I like it. Tell them to vote, then encourage them to vote for Harris (especially if you’re in a swing state).

      • @rockSlayer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        1122 hours ago

        You can try that, but they should be separate conversations. Have one conversation about how voting generally is good. Then have another conversation about candidates. Trying to roll it all in one will still discourage those types of voters for the partisan appearance.

        • @nomous@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          13 hours ago

          I like this approach, just encourage people to vote. I don’t care who or what you vote for, but take 30 minutes and read up on a few issues and then go participate every single time in all the elections.

    • @elliot_crane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      1318 hours ago

      You can’t call any of them by name, unlike Beetlejuice. You have to post something positive, even mildly so, about the Harris/Walz campaign. Then all the little rats come scurrying over to tell you how you’re a genocide stan and any real American should be voting for Cornoliverill Stein de la Fruit, and it’s definitely not because daddy Putin said so.

    • @GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      I broke the script the other day when they said they were ok with a trump second term. That they weren’t afraid of trump. I highlighted the conservative judicial appointments impact the working class and minority groups and they simply couldn’t address it.

        • @Veneroso@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          -1
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          Encouraging people to vote third party in a two party system is enabling Fascism as those votes should go to Harris. Trump is a fascist. If you are arguing in good faith, I can explain why. But I feel like you’re not, hence, Tankie.

        • @PugJesus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -315 hours ago

          May have been misinterpreted as a flat “I would rather someone vote for a party other than Dem or Rep” without “than not vote at all” to contextualize it.

            • @Veneroso@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              -25 hours ago

              Voting for a third party in our two party system is throwing your vote away. Based on polling, a vote for a third party is a vote for Trump.

              Take whatever you have against Harris and balance it against what a second Trump administration will bring.

              TLDR it’s Fascism. Voting for any third party is signing off on Fascism.

              If you’re an accelerationist, your side is not going to win. What you want is terrible and you’re a terrible person.

              Tankie is the nicest way I could describe you.

              It’s actually far worse.

              You’re a Fascist sympathizer.

              • @Aqarius@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                22 hours ago

                …I wonder what’s the chances you and your ilk are a maga psyop to counteract the “weird” meme by painting dem voters as maniacs.

                • @Veneroso@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  144 minutes ago

                  If you’re voting 3rd party you’re not a Dem voter. You’re a Tankie trying to suppress votes and spread Fascism.

              • @Allero
                link
                -1
                edit-2
                1 hour ago

                Tankie

                Fascist sympathizer

                I wonder what amounts of crowd mentality and brain stew is required to make someone equate two radical opposites.

              • @iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                -24 hours ago

                “Anyone who doesn’t think exactly like me is a fascist.”

                Do you not see how this is abrasive? Do you think you are swaying anyone to your side with this kind of discourse?

                • @Veneroso@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  13 hours ago

                  So lets pretend for the moment that a green party candidate or another random 3rd party won.

                  Do you think that they’ll have a mandate?

                  What about their legislative agenda?

                  They’re a lame duck.

                  Without Congress to pass laws they are useless and they have no representation in Congress so that’s dead on arrival.

                  If you legitimately want a 3rd party choice, then you have to advocate for ranked choice voting. Run for your local school board, local legislature. Coalitions are built from the bottom up, not the top down.

                  Jill Stein can’t even bring herself to call Putin a war criminal. Makes me wonder who’s financing her campaign. I don’t care what her people said about it later, she is obviously compromised.

                  Cornell West? He probably needs to make alimony payments and thought hey I can use this to sell a book.

                  Look, Biden is far from perfect, and least Harris presents an option from a different path. Trump isn’t going to stop Israel. Did you see what Miriam Adelson made Trump promise to do for her support? Let Israel annex the West Bank.

                  The only thing that might stop that is voting for Harris. And if you don’t, then you’re co-signing genocide. But that’s your choice. Tankies always go for the end justifies the means route. I guess that that means finishing up the Palestinian genocide. Better to kill em quick than to let them suffer longer right? Why not give Ukraine to Putin too right?