The NHS is going to use drones to fly blood samples across London to avoid the traffic.

Drone flights will mean the samples can be transported in a fraction of the time it currently takes couriers via road, officials said.

Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust has launched a pilot scheme that intends to drastically speed up the time taken to move blood from major hospitals in the capital to labs for analysis.

Usually, moving samples between Guy’s Hospital and the lab at St Thomas’ Hospital takes more than half an hour on the road.

However, the same journey can be done in less than two minutes by drone, officials said.

The research team also said there were environmental benefits to the switch in transport methods.

  • @iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I am glad this came before drones topped with surveillance cameras and tasers. But the latter will come nevertheless, probably first in USA, Russia or China, I reckon.

    • @HumanPenguin@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Won’t make you feel any better.

      But lasers on a drone as a weapon is not yet very practice. Drone would need to be huge. And bullets are just better for the weight.

      Atm, closest we are likely to get is blue whales with lasers on the head.

  • GreatAlbatrossM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    102 days ago

    I see no downside: If they crash and burn, it’s free black pudding!

  • @tal
    link
    English
    62 days ago

    I’m not saying that drones aren’t worthwhile, but if this sort of thing becomes common, there are gonna be some noise pollution implications for cities. Like, buildings may need more soundproofing or something.

    • @Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 day ago

      Near me drones carrying medical equipment get the same air rights as the air ambulance service. I don’t see everyone getting that same privilege.

    • Pennomi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      202 days ago

      There’s no way a drone like this makes more noise than a truck. At 50 meters up, they’re virtually undetectable.

      • @tal
        link
        English
        31 day ago

        https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8198898/

        Available literature suggests that drone noise is substantially more annoying than road traffic or aircraft noise at the same level. This shows that available exposure–response curves, e.g., to predict the probability of high annoyance to aircraft noise [57], are hardly transferable to drone noise.

        I mean, if it doesn’t bother you, maybe no prob.

        • @rbesfe@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          at the same level

          I have a hard time believing that the decibel level of a drone will come close to that of road noise. They operate much farther from people than vehicles do.

      • FiveMacs
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 days ago

        Bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz x40000 because companies dgaf about you

    • @Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 day ago

      you can make quieter drones, especially as the technology gets properly deployed like this and more research goes into it. Plus i’m sure they could come up with better routes that have it fly over areas where the noise affects people less, like fly it in an arc instead of having it hover a set distance from the ground.

    • GreatAlbatrossM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 day ago

      I think it’s time for me to get into the soundproofing and triple glazing business.

    • @friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 days ago

      This is why I really don’t want flying cars in the way ground cars operate. And sound proof buildings isn’t enough, because I like being outside.