WASHINGTON, May 18 (Reuters) - Several top White House aides say they are confident protests across U.S. college campuses against Israel’s offensive in Gaza will not translate into significantly fewer votes for Joe Biden in November’s election, despite polls showing many Democrats are deeply unhappy about the president’s policy on the war.

The White House optimism on the issue, which is shared by many in the Biden campaign, runs contrary to dire warnings from some Democratic strategists and youth organizers who warn misjudging the situation could cost Biden votes in a tight race with Republican rival Donald Trump.

      • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        6 months ago

        The U.S. Census Bureau estimated 54.1% of 18- to 29-year-olds voted in 2020, which had the highest youth turnout overall of any election in the 21st century.

        Average across all ages is 60%

        (Credit to @jordanlund@lemmy.world)

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        So you won’t be blaming them if Trump wins? If they’re insignificant enough to ignore, they’re too insignificant to blame.

          • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            No, I would blame Biden for being a complete fucking ass about the whole Palestinian Genocide.

            There’s a right side and a wrong side here. To be incredibly blunt: the fact that Jewish people endured the Holocaust does not give Israel carte blanche to perpetrate their own genocide. And that puts aside the fact that Israel is NOT, in fact, synonymous with Jewish people. There are a hell of a lot of Jews (including Israeli civilians) who vehemently object to what’s happening.

              • juicy
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                6 months ago

                Sorry, buddy, but no, we won’t let you and Biden have your genocide and another term, too. If it’s that important that he has four more years, Biden knows what he needs to do. Being able to look past genocide isn’t enlightened, pragmatic or strategic, it’s moral depravity.

    • Neato@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      Belief is irrelevant. PR would always say this to downplay affects and keep supporters engaged. Apathy will kill Biden’s chances more than anything else.

  • Wilzax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    6 months ago

    My favorite is when counter protesters begin chanting “Fuck Joe Biden” and the pro-Palestine protestors join in

      • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Honestly idk what sounds crazier to me, that the counter protesters are democrats disguised as trump people because they have the most to gain from the protests being silenced, or that the counter protesters are actually right wing nazis in support of…ending the protests in order to benefit Joe Biden and literal Zionists because “libs bad.”

        I just think it’s funny that really with the state of the world neither would come as a surprise, honestly.

  • WraithGear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    They think so huh? I mean if Biden wanted to vote for trump he should just say so!

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    6 months ago

    This is what “blue no matter who” gets us.

    Politicians who don’t care what we want because they’re entitled to our votes as long as they’re not as bad as Republicans.

    Right now Schumer and Biden are trying to pass a “border bill” that would make some of the things we gave Trump shit for legal. Like, Biden really wanted to codify that any sitting president can “shit down the border” and prevent any asylum seekers from entering.

    A child could see that if that passes, republicans will always say it needs done in office. Millions of people will be hurt by it, but it gives moderate Dems another knife to Dem voters throats:

    Vote for me, or republicans will do that thing I just passed a law to let them do!

    And there’s no guarantee the Dem won’t do it anyways.

    It’s really like watching a real life Brewster’s millions, Biden keeps doing shit that’s going to cost him the election, but apparently even listening to someone 40 years younger or even slightly to the left isn’t something Biden can handle.

    He only compromised with Republicans, and then gives them everything they want.

    If protests don’t work to change Biden’s mind, what will?

    What other options do voters have?

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      No… this is what a rigged primary system gets us.

      Voting for Republicans at this point - or voting third party - is voting for fascism. There is precisely zero chance that Trump will handle the Gaza Genocide better than Biden will. If Trump wins, I would expect him to order a few B-52 squadrons to carpet bomb Gaza “to help Israel”, and then he’d also probably do the same to the West Bank just because he thinks it’d make him look like a big boy.

      • WraithGear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Not voting at all is the real worry. It takes effort to vote. And when you can’t even rally your base against trump then you ducked up bad. He literally saying that he does not have to appeal to his base because he has them with the threat of trump. Fine then they just don’t give a fuck any more. Disengagement is the name of the game and we all lose

      • psvrh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yeah, this.

        The back half of “Blue no matter who” was supposed to be primarying out regressive Democrats. Much like Labour in the UK, the party is doing its best to disenfranchise and disengage with actual progressives, so this is slow going.

        It’s not impossible, though: Republicans, to their current horror, let the inmates run the asylum and it shifted their political alignment from “capitalist” to “fascist”.

        • Jaysyn@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          If that were remotely true the fascist GOP wouldn’t spend all their time, money & effort in making sure fewer people voted.

          • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            6 months ago

            Clinton won California by a 2:1 margin and Trump was still president.

            The fascists know how to play the game better than the non-fascists.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    I think the #1 problem is defining “youth voter” as 18-29.

    College age is 18-24, but I don’t see anything looking specifically at that demographic.

    For 18-29:

    https://circle.tufts.edu/latest-research/state-state-youth-voter-turnout-data-and-impact-election-laws-2022

    “Nationally, CIRCLE estimates that 23% of eligible young Americans cast a ballot in the 2022 midterm elections.”

    Now, problem #1, that’s a mid-term election which always draws lower voter participation.

    2nd is looking at 18-29 instead of 18-24.

    https://ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/news/2023/12/05/young-americans-harvard-poll-trump-biden

    “The U.S. Census Bureau estimated 54.1% of 18- to 29-year-olds voted in 2020, which had the highest youth turnout overall of any election in the 21st century.”

    • samus12345@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      There is a huge difference between 18 and and 29, so it is odd that they lump all of them together.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        As a “youth vote”. My 28 year old kid and his 29 year old wife haven’t been in school in years now.

  • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    6 months ago

    I was a libertarian in college. So yeah, college students don’t have enough awareness to realize that another Trump presidency could mean the end of America (if SCOTUS doesn’t beat him to it).

    • Neato@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Some do. As a Freshman in college I was an idiot because I was raised on years of conservative talk radio every day to and from school. Took a bit less than a year to realize all that shit was made up and get deprogrammed. Then it’s been a leftward trend ever since.

    • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Sounds about white. Jk, kinda

      I was pretty far left by the end of high school. I only just missed voting for Obama and was all about that change! That was when I learned about things like our high income inequality, low social mobility, and rampant corporate profits

      On a related note, I was super caught off guard by all the “libertarians” that hopped on that grifter, Ron Paul’s, train. Man what a time. So many heated discussions. Good times

      Did you support Paul(s)? Any regerts?

      • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I did support Ron back in the day. I still mostly respect the guy though. If he is another right wing grifter he’s got his mask on 24/7. I don’t think I’ve ever heard anything contradictory from him. However, like most “libertarians” he completely ignores that corporations exist or he thinks they’ll magically self-regulate.

        Rand went zero to fascist in no time so I was never really a supporter.

        • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yeah, grifter maybe isn’t the best word to use. I just meant in the sense that libertarians seem to support policies that help themselves, even/especially if it’s at the expense of others.

          That’s really good you were able to see the policies Rand supported were even worse

  • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    It reminds me of the Star Trek TOS episode “City On The Edge of Forever.”

    When McCoy goes back in time to the 1930s he changes the future and ends the Federation. When Kirk and Spock go back they discover that a rising anti-war sentiment would lead to America staying out of WW2, allowing the Nazis to take control of the world.

    • IndustryStandard@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I had to look up the date of TOS it aired 1966–1969 during the Vietnam war.

      The lesson to be learnt here is that stopping the Vietnam war meant the Nazis would take over the world.

      The anti-war sentiment won in 1973. That is year the Nazis and communists took over America and the whole world.

      And that’s all the fault of college kids protesting against the Vietnam war.

      • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        So, you don’t know the difference between “1930” and “1970.”

        You don’t know who was fighting in the Vietnam War.

        Maybe, just maybe, instead of looking up the dates of old TV shows, you should read some actual history and basic math books?

        https://bookshop.org/p/books/a-young-people-s-history-of-the-united-states-revised-and-updated-howard-zinn/18074845?ean=9781644212516

        https://bookshop.org/p/books/math-made-easy-brain-based-learning-elementary-and-middle-school-math-james-paicopolos/15984839?ean=9798585055546

        • IndustryStandard@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          I am substituting the Nazis for the Soviets as an example.

          In 1970 the argument was that if America pulled out of Vietnam the commies would take over the world.

          For every time 1930 is used as an excuse to promote war, a lot of pointless wars have been lost without dr. Evil taking over the world.

          • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            That’s like saying because Jack the Ripper stabbed people no surgery should ever be allowed.

            There were plenty of people who were against America getting into WW1 who turned around years later and pushed for war in 1930.

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              That’s like saying because Jack the Ripper stabbed people no surgery should ever be allowed.

              No, that’s an entirely different episode of Star Trek.

              • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                [long ]

                When they started making '2001:A Space Odyssey" they planned on making the Mysterious Object a glowing diamond, as in the original short story.

                They couldn’t make the diamond work, so they put black tape over the diamond in all the story boards. The tape was a placeholder for the time when they figured out what would be a really good Mysteriosu Object.

                One day, someone looked at the storyboard and said that maybe they should just just the black slab.

                Years pass, and all the viewers come up with theory after theory about what the Monolith is supposed to be. A book? A tombstone? A doorway?

                One day, a young fan comes to Arthur Clarke and tells Clarke that he knows the secret. The ratio of the rectangle is 1 : 4 : 9, the squares of the first three numbers. Clarke loves it and puts it in the next book in the series.

                The point of the story is that I could have pretended that I made that commnet without thinking about the Jack The Ripper episode. I didn’t and so I pass on the coveted No Prize.

                https://en.wikid.org/Marvel_No-Prize

  • Jaysyn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’d hope that most Muslims are intelligent enough to put their emotions aside & vote for the candidate that hasn’t committed to stripping birthright citizenship & mass exile of Muslims post-election.

    But you never know…

    • juicy
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      You BlueAnons truly have no self-awareness, do you?

    • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I would phrase it another way, people that don’t vote against Trump simply don’t care as much about their fellow Muslim-, Mexican-, and gay-American citizens (and noncitizens, etc.) compared to other issues

      I said it in 2016 and it’s still true today. It’s the US though; that’s literally always been true. It’s honestly time the rest of us realized it and accepted reality

    • juicy
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Hahaha! Whenever I see someone arguing “Vote Blue no Matter Who” on here, I don’t have to look far to find evidence that they don’t actually mind the genocide at all. “SJW”