• fidodo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    8 months ago

    So to put this in perspective, at an average cost of 10 cents per LEGO this set would cost over 4 million dollars.

    • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      This reminds me of my giant turd analogy.

      Basically, there is this giant turd, its enormous, biggest thing you’ve ever seen Everyone is fighting and climbing over each other to touch thia turd. The more of your body that touches the turd the more you own.

      At the bottom, people are barely getting a tip of their finger through the crowds to touch the turd, some cant touch it at all. They are poor or homeless.

      As you move up the turd there are people with a whole hand on the turd, they are coping, they get by, pretty average amount of turd to be touching.

      Some people have two hands on the turd and they do pretty well, quite well off.

      Then theres those who are whole bodies in the turd, they are rolling in it, they have some put away that others can’t touch. They are set for life.

      But then, you look up, and its jeff bezos, elon musk et al. Sitting on the rim of a giant toilet seat in the sky all taking a massive dump…

      Its a shit analogy but its accurate.

      I guess it would be more concise to say the mega rich are eating chicken whilst the rest of us fight for the scraps that fall off the table.

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Horse and sparrow economics is what they used to call trickle down. The more I learn about “economics,” the more it looks like they are just lying to themselves ever since Keynes, so they can continue to be horrible people until we slap the shit out of them, and make them change.

    • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Thanks for this. Something about having to scroll, and it being zoomed in to almost everyday scale makes this hit so much harder than graphs with a tiny dot next to the wealth of the billionaires.

      It’s insanity.

    • jh29a@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’ve been thinking: if we’re a nice kind of government, couldn’t we just print the money we’re going to use to for example, give americans in poverty 10000$ ? This would “just devalue the money the rich people have”, so something about international exchange rates is propably the thing that stops me from mentally circumventing the freedom-based value that we can’t just take money people have earned. really gross food for thought

      • orbular
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        Think of it like a ratio. It devalues the savings of every day people more significantly than it devalues the massive piles rich people have. Rich people have this insane buffer and always have the means to play the rigged system to their favour and win.

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        The biggest problem with that is that rich people don’t actually have massive piles of cash, they have massive piles of stocks. Devalue the currency, and their stocks are worth a lot more actual cash

  • Azzu@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    8 months ago

    I calculated it, this looks like 32 x 48 blocks, so a total volume of roughly 15.6 m³. Considering that they’re going to be loose in the box and not perfectly stacked, I’d double that volume. This would result in a box set, if it were a cube, with ~3m sides. The weight would be 10.53 tons.

        • NeptuneOrbit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          The dollar bills have a slight hollow indent, so you can’t just model them as a solid prism of ABS. I assume is the question here. You might be off by about 15%

          • Eiim@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            The part pictured here seems to be 3069px7 with the base color incorrectly set to white. In any case, it’s 3069, the standard 1x2 tile. Thanks to the folks at LDraw who have modeled every Lego brick in detail (because of course people have done that), we get a volume of 303.8mm³, with a bounding box size of 409.6mm³, for a density of about 74%. But, Bricklink can just directly tell us the mass of a 1x2 tile is 0.26g, so the total mass is 10.5 metric tons.

            • Azzu@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              That’s exactly the weight value I used in my original calculation :)

              • Eiim@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Bricklink is a site for individuals/small business to buy and sell primarily individual Lego pieces, so it’s important for shipping calculations to have reasonably accurate weights of all the pieces. Their weights are therefore contributed by those sellers. Although now that LEGO Group owns Bricklink, you’d think they could just slide them the numbers.

          • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.netOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Bingo.

            In anything that does not perfectly stack, you have to assume a bulk density (density that accounts for porosity)

            This is common in soil science since soils are only 50% solid.

  • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 months ago

    Kinda crazy how one layer of that is more money than most people will ever have available at any given time, and he has over 25,000 layers

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      “Kinda”?

      It’s insane.

      I think millionaires are fine, but billionaires are excessively rich. If literally everything in society was fine than maybe, sure, but until then…

  • Skeezix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    So why does it only come with 40.5 million plastic bux if the title of the set is 4.05 billion