Surely the clearest path to retaining only the best.

  • Rivalarrival
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    8 months ago

    It’s a layoff, but without having to call it a layoff.

    • ɔiƚoxɘup@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 months ago

      Biggest difference in my eyes is that with a layoff you at least get to choose who leaves but in this case you only lose the best and most qualified.

      Nice work Dell.

      • Rivalarrival
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        You’re keeping the people willing to make sacrifices to keep their jobs. You’re keeping the most desperate, most readily exploitable people, and getting rid of anyone who won’t tolerate your abuse.

        • Taleya@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          You’re also losing the prized employees with extremely transferable skillsets you’re lucky to have

          • Rivalarrival
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Not worth it. “Prized” employees can demand concessions. Better to eliminate the need for those “prized” skills entirely, or transfer the need to contractor responsibility rather than keeping them on payroll.