MacN'Cheezus

  • 364 Posts
  • 3.22K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: November 29th, 2023

help-circle
  • MacN'CheezustoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldHear The Good News
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 minutes ago

    Jesus advocated something more radical : if you have something that you don’t need, it’s not yours anymore, it’s something you have to give to people who need what you have.

    You got any Bible verses to back that up? Because all I’ve seen is him reminding people that it would be beneficial for them to do so, but he never forced anyone’s hand.

    For instance, Matthew 19:21 (also Mark 10:21 more or less the same):

    “If you want to be perfect, go, sell what you have and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven”

    Interestingly, in Luke 19:1-10 there is a story of a rich tax collector whom Jesus pays a visit, which ends with him pledging half of his wealth to the poor (and restoring fourfold any ill-gotten gains), to which Jesus replies “Today salvation has come to this house, because he also is a son of Abraham; for the Son of Man has come to seek and to save that which was lost.”

    This certainly does not sound like abolishing private property to me, more like responsible ownership and generous charitable giving.

    What I think you might be referring to is a passage that I believe is somewhere in the epistles, which describes a certain church whose members voluntarily gave up all private ownership for the benefit of the community, unfortunately I cannot find it right now.








  • Look, you asked which of these threats Americans should be more worried about, and I’d be more worried about armed criminal gang members than some spooks in Washington, because the former could pose a direct and immediate threat to my life.

    Even if you’re an illegal and worried about ICE, the worst they’ll do is deport you and send you to an El Salvadorean prison, but at least you’ll still get there in one piece. MS-13 will chop you up with a machete if you cross them.










  • I wouldn’t say none whatsoever, but comparatively little. They’re already engaged in a fairly high stakes military operation costing them massive amounts of resources and manpower every year and constantly teetering on the edge of triggering a NATO involvement. Yeah they have nukes, but if they really wanted an all-out war, don’t you think they would have dropped one already?

    I’d say chances are very low. First of all, the US likely has a capable early warning system and the ability to intercept a nuclear warhead in-flight, and second, the potential retaliation would likely be horrifying and not worth the risk. Worrying about armed criminal gang members who are already in the country seems to be a lot more sensible to me because they pose a more immediate threat.




  • MacN'CheezustoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldHear The Good News
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    IDK, he didn’t call for a violent revolution to overthrow the rule of the Pharisees or the Romans, nor did he tell people to eat the rich or that they’d stolen their wealth. He didn’t even advocate for free healthcare or government welfare programs because he could supply these things by magic, and he was a staunch believer in taking personal responsibility.

    I’d say he was a moderate leftist at best. Maybe even a centrist.