• MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    My understanding of the original comment was that it was a marksman/spotter. Those are two people who work in tandem to perform a function.

    The spotter looks at the larger picture, usually with some kind of binocular or similar, looking for threats and scanning a large area. Their other function is to protect the marksman. So if a threat (or anything really) approaches their position, the marksman can continue to focus on their job, while the spotter defends their position.

    The marksman is simply just a sniper. It’s a fancy name for a sniper.

    They deploy like this in pretty much every operation. Two man teams. The spotter providing protection and support for the marksman, and the marksman executing the mission.

    I feel like people missed that, or maybe I misunderstood the poster? IDK.

    Killing people is bad.

    • FiniteBanjo
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      A needless inaccurate distinction obscuring what it really is, it is a sniper. It is not normal. These crowds existed before the snipers arrived and will exist long after the protests end.

      • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’m not trying to obfuscate anything. The job title of a “sniper” is “marksman”.

        A marksman is basically a highly accurate Rifleman which is a type of infantry.

        This is all military shit.

        “Sniper” is just a more commonly used term for a marksman, but they’re exactly the same thing.

        The only point to my comment is that you seemed to think that the commenter saying it was a marksman meant it wasn’t a sniper. They’re literally the same job.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyzOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Are they also not the students from the school? So they would have been on campus but not all in one place anyway.

        • FiniteBanjo
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Again with pointless and needless distinctions that attempt to lessen the sin being committed.

          • M0oP0o@mander.xyzOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Umm, I think you have my point backwards… unless you are implying the protesters are sinners?

            • FiniteBanjo
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              I’m saying it doesn’t matter if the people at the protest went to school there or not, that the sniper isn’t warranted, but I do apologize that in a heated moment I accused you of intentionally aiding the opposition.

              • M0oP0o@mander.xyzOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 months ago

                Oh, no worries. I was confused but I don’t think I made my point clear. It was just adding on the ridiculous notion that a large amount of people means snipers for some reason, these people from what I can see would be on campus anyway and the only difference I can see from say 3 months ago would be the political protests.