• hand@lemmy.studio
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    I think that’s a little harsh. Can I ask what you feel is wrong with the graphics as they are?

    I’m currently playing Fallout and my only issue is the UI scaling, the graphics themselves I find quite charming.

    • tal
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I don’t really have a problem with the graphics, but going from memory:

      • They were 8-bit and had visible dithering.

      • They had a 1-bit alpha mask. Either a pixel in a sprite was transparent or not.

      It was also a 2D game designed for a relatively low-resolution display. It’s gonna be either small or pixelated on a current monitor. That being said, I don’t really have great memories of the graphics of 3D isometric conversions of similar 2D isometric games, like the 3D games in the Jagged Alliance series. Silent Storm – 3D from the get-go – was functional but not pretty.

      You could also argue that the game – having hand-drawn graphics – just only had so many frames in things like combat animations:

      https://imgur.com/r6BSwpJ

      mpv says that that GIF is 9 FPS.

      A typical console game has historically been 30 FPS. A lot now are 60 FPS. I have a 165 Hz monitor, and some people use 240 Hz.

      I think that the 2D Fallout games are fine, but – despite being skeptical at first – I think that the move to 3D made a lot of sense. It does add immersiveness, and they did a pretty good job of converting game mechanics.