fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agothis one goes out to the arts & humanitiesmander.xyzimagemessage-square309fedilinkarrow-up11.37Karrow-down161
arrow-up11.31Karrow-down1imagethis one goes out to the arts & humanitiesmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square309fedilink
minus-squaremindbleach@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year ago You’d rather cheer for people to lose their jobs without anyone calling you out on it, sure. I’m not the angry one wishing unemployment on my “enemies” here. Who are you? What do you want?
minus-squareFaceDeer@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoThe ideal endpoint is to eliminate the concept of “jobs” entirely. Why should people have to work?
minus-squaremindbleach@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoOkay. So why are you breaking that guy’s balls, over automating away jobs, which you don’t want to exist?
minus-squareFaceDeer@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down2·1 year agoBecause currently we do need jobs. Otherwise why is he upset about AI in the first place?
minus-squareFaceDeer@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoSure seems to be, he said he’s “stoked” for when AI comes for the “tech bros”’ jobs. But maybe he should speak up to clarify his own view, rather than you and I speculating about it in a side thread that wasn’t actually about him to begin with?
minus-squaremindbleach@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoAre you sure you know what stoked means? Because it sure isn’t anger. But maybe he should speak up to clarify his own view Or you could’ve asked, rather than repeatedly posturing. Especially when he asked you to stop doing that. You need to examine your behavior throughout this thread.
minus-squareFaceDeer@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoYou were the one who started talking on his behalf all of a sudden.
minus-squaremindbleach@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year ago So you’re happy to see AI take someone else’s job as long as it isn’t taking your job. You’d rather cheer for people to lose their jobs without anyone calling you out on it, sure. I’m not the angry one wishing unemployment on my “enemies” here. Do you listen to yourself?
Who are you?
What do you want?
The ideal endpoint is to eliminate the concept of “jobs” entirely. Why should people have to work?
Okay. So why are you breaking that guy’s balls, over automating away jobs, which you don’t want to exist?
Because currently we do need jobs. Otherwise why is he upset about AI in the first place?
Is he?
Sure seems to be, he said he’s “stoked” for when AI comes for the “tech bros”’ jobs. But maybe he should speak up to clarify his own view, rather than you and I speculating about it in a side thread that wasn’t actually about him to begin with?
Are you sure you know what stoked means? Because it sure isn’t anger.
Or you could’ve asked, rather than repeatedly posturing. Especially when he asked you to stop doing that.
You need to examine your behavior throughout this thread.
You were the one who started talking on his behalf all of a sudden.
Do you listen to yourself?
deleted by creator