• FaceDeer@fedia.io
    2·
    1 year ago

    The ideal endpoint is to eliminate the concept of “jobs” entirely. Why should people have to work?

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        52·
        1 year ago

        Because currently we do need jobs. Otherwise why is he upset about AI in the first place?

          • FaceDeer@fedia.io
            3·
            1 year ago

            Sure seems to be, he said he’s “stoked” for when AI comes for the “tech bros”’ jobs. But maybe he should speak up to clarify his own view, rather than you and I speculating about it in a side thread that wasn’t actually about him to begin with?

            • mindbleach@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
              2·
              1 year ago

              Are you sure you know what stoked means? Because it sure isn’t anger.

              But maybe he should speak up to clarify his own view

              Or you could’ve asked, rather than repeatedly posturing. Especially when he asked you to stop doing that.

              You need to examine your behavior throughout this thread.

                • mindbleach@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
                  2·
                  1 year ago

                  So you’re happy to see AI take someone else’s job as long as it isn’t taking your job.

                  You’d rather cheer for people to lose their jobs without anyone calling you out on it, sure.

                  I’m not the angry one wishing unemployment on my “enemies” here.

                  Do you listen to yourself?

                  • FaceDeer@fedia.io
                    12·
                    1 year ago

                    Yes. What’s your point here? Repeatedly quoting my comments back at me isn’t adding anything.