• tal
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    The thought that internet becomes shitty enough that you need a GPU to browse it is really frightening me.

    I mean, there was a point where an FPU was a separate chip and wasn’t the norm; now it’s built into the CPU.

    I think that it’s probably safe to say that, in the future, there will be broader use of parallel processing, as we’ve fundamental limits on what we know we can do there with existing laws of physics with serial processing. That could wind up being part of the CPU. It could live on a separate piece of hardware – which may not necessarily be a “GPU” – parallel processing hardware entered the PC because the most-immediate need was to do 3d graphics rendering, but as you can see from the LLMs that people are running on GPUs today, that’s not the only application. The parallel compute accelerator cards that Nvidia is selling today for an arm and a leg on servers aren’t aimed at doing 3d graphics.

    It may not be 3d graphics rendering or running LLMs that becomes the primary application. But I’d be reasonably comfortable saying that down the line, relative to today, there will be more parallel-processing hardware in computers than is present today.

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      That could wind up being part of the CPU

      For a lot of newer processors, it already is. Intel, Apple, Samsung, and Qualcomm like to brag about their processors having some sort of neural contraption meant to assist with AI processing.

      If it stays around, it might be good enough that you don’t need a GPU to do it, since the CPU has an onboard chip that can handle that work instead, since tensor processors like that are a bit more efficient than GPUs, but are also more specialised.