• Rivalarrival
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      You’ve already accepted the role of the clergy in writing and enforcing them.

      • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        They dont write, they interpret and enforcement is done on a personal or community level typically. Its like you saying that the laws originate with the state not the constitution. No, the constitution is (supposed to be) the main document that the applicable laws are based on, states can go against it, but the basis is the constitution (or at least it is supposed to be).

        • Rivalarrival
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          The constitution is not the basis of law, nor is it supposed to be the basis of law. Laws do not originate from the constitution.

          The constitution establishes government. The government establishes law.

          If the Bible is analogous to the constitution, then the clergy is analogous to government.

          To make the constitution analogous to the Bible, we would need a couple dozen different variants of the constitution, written at various times, to and from various languages. We’d have to do away with states, and the three branches. The clergy would consist of every county sheriff throughout the nation. Every sheriff would hold the full power of government, dictating what rules are important and what can be ignored. But, the sheriffs wouldn’t agree with each other on what is important.

          Most importantly, we would have to remove the amendment process from the constitution, and let the sheriff’s take care of that, too.