Lemmy Today
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Stamets@lemmy.world to Funny: Home of the Haha@lemmy.world · 1 year ago

The final Police Officers Training Exam

lemmy.world

message-square
35
link
fedilink
613

The final Police Officers Training Exam

lemmy.world

Stamets@lemmy.world to Funny: Home of the Haha@lemmy.world · 1 year ago
message-square
35
link
fedilink
  • blahsay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Edit apparently I’m not lazy today.

    Here is a Harvard study: https://scholar.harvard.edu/fryer/publications/empirical-analysis-racial-differences-police-use-force?page=0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C1

    ‘On the most extreme use of force –officer-involved shootings – we find no racial differences in either the raw data or when contextual factors are taken into account.’

    • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Well… I’m not gonna lie. I too am lazy and had hopped that you could point me to the controversial data that support your comment.

      I did a quick search though and the only convdincing result that I could find is, that its hard to tell

      https://www.science.org/content/article/study-claims-white-police-no-more-likely-shoot-minorities-draws-fire

      So if don’t mind, can you please oblige me, where did you find the convincing proof that there is no racial bias in police brutality?

      • blahsay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Already updated it with a link. For bonus points I was sceptical of his data and methods but both myself and a professor I know checked and it’s solid work.

        Doesn’t stop people with a race related hate message from trying to discredit it but science don’t care 🤷

    • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Intersting. This was posted 4 years later by Harvard, stating :

      Black Americans are 3.23 times more likely than white Americans to be killed by police

      Black Chicagoans, for example, were found to be over 650% more likely to be killed by police than white Chicagoans.

      https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/hsph-in-the-news/blacks-whites-police-deaths-disparity/

      • blahsay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Neither of those statements indicate a racial disparity in police response by themselves.

        If you don’t understand why…perhaps read the study I posted and see how it’s done.

        • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I found this article commenting on the paper you linked

          Paper finding no racial bias in shootings by police criticized

          https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2016/07/21/paper-finding-no-racial-bias-shootings-police-criticized/87301632/

          • blahsay@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Interesting though his main criticism of the paper is a bit ah…subjective (below). Seems more like he’s manipulating data for an outcome tbh.

            I had a look at the author and he seems to have based his career on race relations which makes me worried about his impartiality too.

            ‘The CPE report acknowledges three problems with measuring police force: measuring “excessive” force against all force, measuring differences in police use of force, and measuring force incidents as unchanging rather than constantly changing. Goff said Fryer neither acknowledges these concepts nor deals with them as problems.’

Funny: Home of the Haha@lemmy.world

funny@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !funny@lemmy.world

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We’re all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

  • /c/TenForward@lemmy.world - Star Trek chat, memes and shitposts

  • /c/Memes@lemmy.world - General memes

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1.06K users / day
  • 3.6K users / week
  • 6.08K users / month
  • 11.2K users / 6 months
  • 59 local subscribers
  • 7.12K subscribers
  • 1.41K Posts
  • 25.3K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Anticorp@lemmy.world
  • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org