Florida is on the verge of passing one of the nation’s most restrictive bans on minors’ use of social media after the state Senate passed a bill Thursday that would keep children under the age of 16 off popular platforms regardless of parental approval.

The measure now goes back to the state House, where the speaker has made the issue his top priority during the legislative session that ends March 8. Still, critics have pointed to similar efforts in other states that have been blocked by courts.

The bill targets any social media site that tracks user activity, allows children to upload material and interact with others, and uses addictive features designed to cause excessive or compulsive use. Supporters point to rising suicide rates among children, cyberbullying and predators using social media to prey on kids.

  • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    They can already do that just through whatever back doors they can get into social media companies if the corps don’t already just give them the data.

    What this is about is shutting young folks up online because they’re the most vocal opponents of stuff like the don’t say gay bill.

    Personally I’m for government issued universal ID, and I think the government should provide a secure verification API, but I don’t think this because I think there should be age restrictions, I think it because I think it’d be a viable solution to mass botting. Something like 2FA being mandatory would also help so that just stealing someone’s card doesn’t automatically give you access to all their shit.

    • Rivalarrival
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s a viable solution to mass botting in the same way that burning down your fucking house is a viable solution for that spider that disappeared behind your headboard.

        • Rivalarrival
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          It’ll work, but it is complete overkill, and has far more harmful side effects than benefits.

          • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Exactly what harmful side effects are there here? It makes blocks and bans more effective, it significantly cuts down sock puppeting and mass botting, it renders engagement manipulation much more difficult, and it requires literally zero 1984 surveillance state shit, I mean unless you’re one of those quacks who thinks a state ID is 1984 surveillance shit despite it literally just making literally everything about securing state services more accessible including obtaining licenses and benefits.

            • Rivalarrival
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              literally just making literally everything about securing state services more accessible including obtaining licenses and benefits.

              When did “blocks and bans” become a “state service”?