• Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Technically we can’t send people to the moon anymore but that’s not really relevant to whether or not we can build a pyramid because one of them requires special technology and the other requires a general purpose crane

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      We could send people to the moon, we haven’t lost the knowledge or resources needed. It’s just that it’s no longer a priority. It was incredibly expensive the first time. Although it would be less expensive the second time, this is a case where there’s absolutely no justification for not working from home (i.e. using robots).

      • decisivelyhoodnoises@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        we haven’t lost the knowledge or resources needed

        Yeah its not that simple. Knowledge is pretty much lost in terms that there is not any easy or practical way to reconstruct for example the computer that navigated the Apollo and assume that this will provide a flawless trip. This hardware is also outdated so it would had been dumb to attempt to reconstruct something so many decades old. Also the code that run there was coded for this specific hardware which makes it unsuitable for modern hardware. So yeah, the knowledge exists in archives but is not really usable as is

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          I don’t know why you’re talking about Apollo hardware and software. The programmers and engineers who wrote that stuff did it from well known scientific and engineering principles. They didn’t have to start with a previous moon mission. The scientific and engineering principles are even better known today, and we have much more experience for space flight.

          The only advantage you’d have with Apollo era stuff is that it has been tested and the bugs are well known. But, so what? Any modern mission to the moon would start from first principles again, not by trying to extend the Apollo stuff.

          • decisivelyhoodnoises@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Yes I know. My reply was towards explaining that the knowledge even though it exists, it still requires big human effort and its not something like “we’d copy what we already have and it will work”

        • rambaroo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          90% of this tech was rebuilt for the SLS/Orion and significantly improved on, and the next 10% involves the lunar lander and is coming within a couple years.

          It’s not only possible, it’s literally being done right now.

          • decisivelyhoodnoises@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Yes I know. My reply was towards explaining that the knowledge even though it exists, it still requires big human effort and its not something like “we’d copy what we already have and it will work”