The whistleblowers also allege Dr. Alexander Eastman was already under investigation for trying to procure narcotics for a friend who worked as a chopper pilot for the border agency.
The whistleblowers also allege Dr. Alexander Eastman was already under investigation for trying to procure narcotics for a friend who worked as a chopper pilot for the border agency.
Pretty sure “does this person sexually harass his staff and/or patients?” is a relevant standard when evaluating job performance.
When major orchestras conduct auditions, they blindfold the conductor. She knows nothing about the candidate’s age, race, sex, weight, height, or proclivity for misogyny when she chooses a new musician.
What does your statement have to do with my condemnation of sexual harassment as disqualifying from the title of “good at their job”?
https://lemmy.today/comment/5768323
And we’re right back to “Not sexually harassing patients is a relevant standard” of patient care.
https://lemmy.today/comment/5768323
At the end of the day, the doctor with the live patient is better than the doctor with the dead patient. Everything else is secondary to that fact.