• MonkeMischief
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    10 months ago

    I think the biggest problem is how it’s such a complicated issue, it’s really hard to just ‘rally the masses around’. Especially when there’s plenty of other runaway complicated issues we also need to rail against.

    I think this is why the “Occupy Wall St.” protests ultimately fizzled. People were pissed, many knew exactly why, many had a vague idea, and many others just wanted to blow off steam.

    One “advanatage” the rich have with their ideology is insidious simplicity. Does it serve money? Do that. Does it keep you rich and punish others? Do that. Terribly predictable, but they all unite under solidarity of acquiring currency. They’re not bothered with how it affects the planet or any other human beings that don’t threaten their accounts.

    A majority of these injustices are essentially us being very unhappy with all the complicated, multifaceted, complex ways in which these weaponized simpletons pursue cash and the power to acquire more cash. We know something is VERY wrong, but untangling it enough to unite under a common demand is a much heavier burden.

    • Alex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      A lot of the problems boil down to FPTP-voting and the current way political campaigns are financed. They result in this polarized deadwater where money and power practically become synonymous words wielded to keep anything from changing via journalism and the courts on this matter. It’s exactly as intended by the old roman aristocrats that designed it over 2 millenia ago to maintain influence regardless of voter outcomes.

      • MonkeMischief
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Excellent dig-up. Thanks for this. :) It’s really hard to maintain “what really happened” as time goes on. I can’t believe this was so long ago.