well thats the point. its yet more ConservativeFearā¢ļø nonsense
I think the sentiments theyāre attempting to tap into (this idea that masculinity is inherently dangerous) are easily found even outside conservative spaces.
Thatās the phrase we used for decades to justify murdering innocent people with flying assassin robots in Iraq and Afghanistan. They were āmilitary-aged malesā and therefore āpresumed to be enemy combatantsā.
Thatās what I was going to point out. Any male between about 16 to 45 was a dead enemy combatant, not a civilian.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
So, when Johnson rose to speak on the House floor Wednesday ā his first such speech since being elected speaker ā and began to talk about immigration, it was through the lens of a politician seeking to effect a political outcome.
Johnsonās speech went on at some length, focusing on Republican resistance to new legislation aimed at addressing the border and his partyās efforts to impeach Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas.
That āby designā line is eyebrow-raising, given the popularity on the right of the conspiracy theory that Democrats are throwing open the entry doors to the country for some putative future political gain.
This idea that immigrants are inherently frightening is a key part of the Republican discussion of the border, given that it heightens a sense of urgency and failure regarding the administration.
Itās all framing: Johnson wants listeners to hear the phrase āmilitary agedā and assume that the immigrants are dangerous and intend to harm Americans.
So, a 24-year-old guy looking for work who comes into the United States is suddenly lumped into an imaginary army of invaders ā bolstering not only Johnsonās rhetoric but the argument of Republicans such as Texas Gov.
The original article contains 1,119 words, the summary contains 196 words. Saved 82%. Iām a bot and Iām open source!
Sounds like they are supporting Abbottās argument that āimmigrationā constitutes āinvasionā.
