I wonder what order to avoid bodily harm means. Is it hidden ceasefire request, or bullshit around where they can say it was military target, sprinkle some ak47 around
If any military operation, no matter how carefully it is carried out, is carried out pursuant to an intention to destroy a “people”, in whole or in part, it violates the Genocide Convention and it must stop. That is why all military operations capable of violating the Genocide Convention must cease.
On Aj Jazeera they are saying this is not an order for a ceasefire.
12:37 GMT “the conditions required… are met” now for the orders
12:41 Israel get’s its first nod… urges the hostages to be released
12:40 GMT Israel has 1 month to write a report about why they are or aren’t doing genocide.
yes well it explains the recent ceasefire offer of 2 months, and Hamas saying ‘sure if the ICJ says ceasefire and you’ll abide by one’
I wonder what order to avoid bodily harm means. Is it hidden ceasefire request, or bullshit around where they can say it was military target, sprinkle some ak47 around
I don’t know what else it could mean. What was the wording of SA’s application?
I wonder if they are going to talk about what they didn’t grant and why. That would clarify it.
They’ve gone to french, so probably has to wait for lawyer brains to chime in in next hour
This is the language in SA’s application:
On Aj Jazeera they are saying this is not an order for a ceasefire.
12:42 Israel has to refrain from genocide
Ruling is 15-2 or 16-2 (they make
35 similar orders I don’t know the nuance between them all)