• @gedaliyah@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    685 months ago

    This is one of a handful of police procedures that are ripe for abuse. Any officer wishing to justify a suspicion can claim that they “smell marijuana” and search a vehicle, home, etc. There is basically no way to contradict them. It’s not like we have smell recordings.

    Another good example is field sobriety tests (walk on this line, count a number of steps, etc.), which have been shown to be highly subjective and inaccurate even when done correctly. Policing is maybe the last modern discipline that ignores evidence-based best practices.

    • @willsenior@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      335 months ago

      If I’m ever on a jury for a case that relies on police testimony as its lynchpin, I’ll hang it single handedly if I have to. Show me some evidence.

      • @octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        19
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Yep. Police testimony without video corroboration carries no weight for me. Fight me. (not you personally)

        Edit: Removed the word “hearsay” because I was using it wrong.

        • @Xtallll@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          145 months ago

          I’ll fight, police testimony without video corroboration isn’t hearsay, it’s perjury until proven otherwise!

        • TheRealKuni
          link
          fedilink
          English
          25 months ago

          Yep. Police testimony without video corroboration is hearsay. Fight me. (not you personally)

          IIRC technically the video would be more likely to be hearsay than the cop testifying.

          Hearsay is an out-of-court statement which is being offered in court to prove the truth of the matter asserted.

          Video and audio recordings are sometimes hearsay evidence by definition, statements made outside the court. But there are lots of exceptions to the hearsay rule and often recordings are admissible.

          Note, I am not a lawyer and am basing most of this on LegalEagle videos like this oneand some reading I’ve done on the subject.

          • @octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            25 months ago

            Yeah it seems I used the word wrong. I accept your correction, but I hope the point I was trying to make is still clear. 🙂

          • @octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            15 months ago

            I was using it to mean “not any more reliable than a statement from any person I don’t intrinsically trust” - but I see your point and accept your correction if such is the case.

            Police testimony means nothing to me without some form of corroboration, and if it’s their description of how or why they killed someone, that corroboration should be video or very convincing non-police witnesses.

  • guyrocket
    link
    fedilink
    205 months ago

    I saw a cop on the news a few years ago saying he smelled alcohol on someone’s breath as justification for stopping someone. Not sure that was factual.

    There’s always some bullshit reason they can use to stop someone and then bullshit charges they can apply.

    • Aniki 🌱🌿
      link
      fedilink
      English
      115 months ago

      Not sure that was factual.

      Did the cop have breath-radar? How the fuck did he pull someone over for bad breath?

        • guyrocket
          link
          fedilink
          35 months ago

          That’s plausible. Many scenarios are possible.

          This guy was walking down the street. And being black in a high class white snobby suburb.

  • DominusOfMegadeus
    link
    fedilink
    18
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    “I smelled marijuana once, but i didn’t inhale, so I can speak to this with authority.” - Brett Kavanaugh probably

  • Flying Squid
    link
    fedilink
    75 months ago

    If you buy from a legal Illinois dispensary, you should be safe either way. They put it in packaging that has no detectable smell.

    • PugJesus
      link
      fedilink
      615 months ago

      If you buy from a legal Illinois dispensary, you should be safe either way. They put it in packaging that has no detectable smell.

      Don’t worry. The lack of a detectable smell has never stopped cops from ‘smelling’ marijuana before.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        45 months ago

        True, but at least just buying from a dispensary shouldn’t be a worry in and of itself.

        • @DrPop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          45 months ago

          What if I repackage and go to a friend’s house? Laws like this restrict what consumers are allowed to do.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            fedilink
            15 months ago

            I’m absolutely not in favor of the law, I didn’t mean to give that impression.

    • @Telodzrum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      65 months ago

      IDK what dispensaries you’re visiting. But, even through the manufacturer’s packaging and the dispensary’s packaging it was quite loud in my car driving home.

    • @Concave1142@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      45 months ago

      Not true of the dispensary I visited a few months ago while in a legal state. You could smell cannabis in the parking lot from the building and smell it once I got it back to the car where the smell lingered for hours even after double bagging it.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        15 months ago

        I can’t speak of dispensaries in other states. I’ve been to several in Illinois and that is how they all do it. There is a heavy cannabis smell when they actually let you inside the place where you buy it and maybe if a cop was hanging right outside the driveway into the dispensary specifically to catch people leaving, they might smell it on you, but considering they hire off-duty cops to be security, I doubt it.

    • @this_1_is_mine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      15 months ago

      So funny as every dispo has a smell. Of weed. If the jars and containers are smell proof where’s it coming from.?.

      No way every container is perfectly sealing. And if even 1 I buy leaks slightly it will smell like weed in my car even if I don’t open the container. So is it really fair to use smell as the 1 factor needed to allowing search.

    • @FireTower@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      105 months ago

      Precedent in different states doesn’t bind the rulings of other states. A federal district court could establish precedent for all of the district. National precedent would come from the SCOTUS.

      Other court rulings maybe raised as a persuasive reason though.

    • @Telodzrum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      55 months ago

      No, a state court’s decision from a different state does not have precedential authority in the instant state.

      • Aniki 🌱🌿
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -15 months ago

        That’s not true at all. You can absolutely argue federal laws at the state level and use other courts rulings and precedent.

        • @Telodzrum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          45 months ago

          The linked articles cover decisions issued by state courts. They are not controlling on other states. What exactly are you trying to say?

    • Flying Squid
      link
      fedilink
      45 months ago

      Depends on the state, and the WaPo article is paywalled, so I don’t know if that applies to Illinois yet. It should apply everywhere.

  • Just because it’s legal to have doesn’t mean it’s legal to consume while driving so I’m kinda conflicted on this one. Smelling weed alone shouldn’t be justification. Smelling burning weed, on the other hand…

    • Chainweasel
      link
      fedilink
      English
      115 months ago

      Cops use “smell of marijuana” and “smell of burning marijuana” literally everyday to profile people and give themselves excuses to pull over and search minorities.

    • @BakerBagel@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      115 months ago

      Cops claim they smell weed so they can search your car, and you cant argue they didnt have probable cause since they can’t record a smell.

      If i get pulled over and there is blood dripping from my trunk, that is valid probable cause, andbthe dashcam footage will capture it. Cops can just claim they smelled weed and search you and you are now Sol

    • @Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      15 months ago

      I don’t like even smelling burning weed being okay. Then I can drive my stoner friends around all the time and they can smoke in my car.

    • @this_1_is_mine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      15 months ago

      Its easier for illegal seizure when they can blanket cover their ass that there is some underlying thing that allowed them to be able to take whatever they wanted like when you’re randomly driving to go and purchase a vehicle from somebody and you happen to have all of that funds in cash but the police can seize it take it from you and you can’t even contest it took far later and some how its my responsibility to prove the money isn’t illicit