• Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      142
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s because furries are overwhelmingly queer and often used as a stand in for fear mongering about trans people (ex: the “litter boxes in schools” rumor).

        • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          76
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I would say it’s more that they recognize furries are largely a queer subculture (regardless of the fact that straight furries exist) and correctly recognize it as less objectionable to most people’s sensibilities to say you’re getting furries removed from schools by animal control than it is to say you’re getting queer kids removed from schools by animal control.

          • Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            43
            ·
            1 year ago

            It sounds really outlandish until you remember that in the 80s, DnD was used to make everyone afraid of a literal Satan, and we ended up with children testifying they were flown across the country and back to participate in Satanic rituals or flushed down toilets into hidden chambers where people were sacrificing live animals to the Dark Lord in the 8-9 hours they were at daycare.

            People went to prison over this.

            • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              24
              ·
              1 year ago

              In the early 90s my mom was convinced Satanic women got pregnant and gave birth to babies to murder in rituals, and nobody could prove it because they gave birth outside a hospital and no record of the children existed.

              I get some of the 80s/90s nostalgia but SO much of it was just actual hell lol.

        • Furbag@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          11 months ago

          I mean, furries have been targeted by the right for a long time, but they are nothing if not famous for winning the battle but losing the war when it comes to trying to stamp out subcultures they don’t like. They’ve finally given up on trying to legislate homosexuality away, so now they’re turning their attention to a less understood and more marginalized subculture of individuals. They’ll give up on that eventually too when they realize they’ll never win and turn their attention to the next vulnerable group to rally and galvanize their base.

      • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        54
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Which stemmed from an active shooter measure that would have allowed kids to relieve themselves without out having to leave the safety of their hiding place.

          • jak@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I know 11 year olds who would rather take a chance with a gunman than piss themselves in front of their whole class. Giving them a more dignified way to do things is only a good thing

    • Eylrid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Being a politician is all about getting attention. The more outrageous the bill or the thing the bill is addressing the more attention. This bill will hopefully never pass, but here we are talking about it.

    • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      And projection that a bunch of them are probably into furries, or domination, or both.

      We clearly need Barney Frank’s ‘expose em when they oppress’ tactics back in the house.