Flying would be interesting.

Ah, well. That was something.

Yeah, that’s definitely a possibility. OP sounds kinda down too.

I wouldn’t wear white with a rodent in my earlobe.

Pretty sure the Danes weren’t quiet.

The few that I have met have been accepting of us queer people. But my sample size is incredibly small.

I think most of them a decent people based off of the anecdotal evidence I have.

That last sentence is the important one.

You probably could, but that sounds like a nightmare mixture that could go off with atmospheric moisture. Though I do not have enough chemistry training to say for certain.

You are probably right that it would be interesting.

A lot of countries require the equivalent of probable cause to do a cavity search before entering institutions like prisons, jails, or asylums as a prisoner or patient.

Lol, doesn’t read the summary, uses overly broad terms and then points the finger at someone else.

Are ya sure?

From the summary:

The activists, detained after a protest against Leonardo, an aerospace company, accused police of singling out women for this treatment.

Any other arguments that are D.O.A?

Well, that could be a number of alkali metals.

As far as I’m aware aluminium doesn’t have that sort of reactivity.

Oh, he lost his eyebrows during the show.

No current reports. Though look for birds going backwards.

Well bird flu is making the rounds

That’s only if you don’t throw it far enough.

Like using the drake meme there are better templates.

The point of the matter is the previous poster said that it was standard, my response proved it wasn’t.

If you read even the summary you will see that it wasn’t uniformly implemented.

From the same article

United States edit

In the United States, Bell v. Wolfish is the benchmark case on this issue. In its judgment of the case, the U.S. Supreme Court established a standard of reasonable grounds for performing cavity searches. Among these are security concerns at prisons. Such searches are generally governed by the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which prohibits searches without probable cause.[3]

Then why are they saying only the women had to do this?

Edit: I’ve never had a cavity search any of the times I have been arrested.

And the USMCA tends to favour Canada and Mexico.