Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de to Linux@lemmy.ml · 10 months agoFish rewrite-it-in Rust progress: 100%aus.socialexternal-linkmessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up1235arrow-down18file-textcross-posted to: fishshell@programming.devrust@programming.devhackernews@derp.foo
arrow-up1227arrow-down1external-linkFish rewrite-it-in Rust progress: 100%aus.socialChewy@discuss.tchncs.de to Linux@lemmy.ml · 10 months agomessage-square21fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: fishshell@programming.devrust@programming.devhackernews@derp.foo
minus-squareParetoOptimalDevlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·10 months agoIt was needed to safely further support for concurrent features? If they follow through on adding that support, there will likely be adoption. The problem is in most cases the implementers stop at “same thing but in rust” without taking advantage of that. I can’t fully blame them since just duplicating an existing thing is a huge undertaking.
It was needed to safely further support for concurrent features? If they follow through on adding that support, there will likely be adoption.
The problem is in most cases the implementers stop at “same thing but in rust” without taking advantage of that.
I can’t fully blame them since just duplicating an existing thing is a huge undertaking.