From https://www.reddit.com/r/NoStupidQuestions/comments/14phpbq/how_is_it_possible_that_roughly_50_of_americans/

Question above is pretty blunt but was doing a study for a college course and came across that stat. How is that possible? My high school sucked but I was well equipped even with that sub standard level of education for college. Obviously income is a thing but to think 1 out of 5 American adults is categorized as illiterate is…astounding. Now poor media literacy I get, but not this. Edit: this was from a department of education report from 2022. Just incase people are curious where that comes from. It does also specify as literate in English so maybe not as grim as I thought.

  • legion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you don’t understand, start walking further away from the cities.

    If you still don’t understand, you’re not done walking.

    • mochi@lemdit.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you think the problem is in the countryside, you’ve never been to New York City, and particularly the Bronx.

    • Kaiser@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Walk far enough into certain cities and you’ll see the same problem. It’s very closely tied to socio-economic class and a self perpetuating problem.

      • Riskable@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Home schoolers/child abusers are everywhere.

        Note: Not talking about legitimate, regular curriculum, “online school” for kids that can’t attend normal school for whatever reason, (e.g. bullying, immunocompromised, etc). I’m referring to religious/cult garbage home schooling stuff that doesn’t teach kids much of anything. Parents that put girls through these programs often end them at the fifth or sixth grade (because that’s all they need to be “good wives”).

    • Rannoch@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      To add to this, I think people often underestimate how “easy” it can be to function in society without being able to read well. I know that some folks who either don’t read at all or read at a very low level have just gotten used to interpreting the world around them without the language part. For example, visually recognizing a username and password field on a website and knowing what they’re for, or recognizing the symbols and colors used for certain objects or meanings, all without the actual words needing to mean anything to them for them to understand what it is and what to do with it. And for those who can read at a 5th or 4th grade level (and would thus be included in the stat mentioned in this post), they’re likely then very capable of reading and understanding the majority of text they’re going to come across in their day-to-day lives.

      Of course, I don’t want this to sound like I’m saying being illiterate is easy, I’m sure it creates MANY barriers and difficulties for the person, but I do think humans are also flexible and resilient, and are able to survive using other cues.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because the government, federal and state level (especially conservative) hate public education and fight to defund it as much as possible. Largely because an educated populace is a dangerous populace. Especially when your political platform relies on identity politics, culture wars, cheating, screwing over the poor, opposing minorities, religious fundamentalism, and any other regressive, oppressive bullshit you can think of. They want stupid voters that they can point at “the enemy” and pit against each other to distract them from facts, all so they can stay rich and powerful.

    • pachrist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s because a lot of conservatives believe in a really screwed up, masochistic, bastardized version of Christianity that prioritizes vengeance, punishment, and anger. It ignores the love, kindness, acceptance, and mercy (ie the actual teachings of Jesus) that make society work well.

      So, when kids come home with these new ideas about kindness and acceptance, because being kind to a gay classmate is a great way to demonstrate the love real Christianity teaches and society values, the parents freak out. They push to ban books, fire teachers, and move their kids to private schools that more match their hate filled, divisive worldview. Education polluted their child with abnormal, liberal indoctrination, like being kind, empathetic, and accepting of others.

      I an attempt to steer their children back to their core values of hate and divisiveness, they lash out. Any pushback the parents feel in response becomes persecution, because of course “the world” would disagree with them. They’re the TRUE Christians afterall. So they isolate in ecochambers, and they get more hateful. Any difference of opinion is met with derision and just simply validates their position. And despite being the TRUE Christians, or REAL conservatives, they become less Christian and less conservative every day, instead just becoming these weird, evil, empty husks of people with no real values or ideals outside of hate.

  • joeymaynard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    So I am a researcher by trade in this field, got a PhD, and develop these kinds of stats (at a more local level). I also have taught basic adult literacy for about 15 years. I think the poster was likely referring to an NCES stat.

    We tend to think of adults with low English literacy as people who dropped out of school or never went. We also tend to think “illiterate” is binary, you can read or you can’t. But the definition is based around grade-level reading (what can you identify and synthesize from standardized text in English in a given time frame) and inclusive of a broader population. We’re talking about people who can’t pick up a copy of USA today and tell you the main idea of a front-page article. They can drive, they can work, etc. So they get along and this issue get ignored.

    For example, some stats on illiteracy will count “non-participants” among those who can’t read/write, but this includes people in the study with cognitive disabilities or language barriers to the point that they can’t take the reading test. The share of U.S. adults who are functionally illiterate in English includes some non-native English speaking adults and also a couple generations of folks with reading diasbilities who passed through school, AND people who didn’t read for myriad other reasons.

    I have tutored older adults learning to read/write for many years and have met a lot of people who ran businesses or raised families or worked full careers before learning to read. Adaptable and clever bunch. And even many U.S.-born native English speakers who got shuffled through high school despite serious disadvantage and/or disabilities.

    • Hedup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      people who can’t pick up a copy of USA today and tell you the main idea of a front-page article

      Thanks! Suddenly America makes a lot of sense now.

    • rwhitisissle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      the definition is based around grade-level reading (what can you identify and synthesize from standardized text in English in a given time frame) and inclusive of a broader population. We’re talking about people who can’t pick up a copy of USA today and tell you the main idea of a front-page article.

      Purely anecdotal, but I know someone who is a tenured professor at a university that will flat out refuse to answer any question that has too much supporting detail around it. As in, if you say “for this part of the assignment, I’m doing…” and proceed to describe your attempt at problem solving over four or five sentences, asking if what you’ve done is correct or close to it, and he will simply respond with “there’s too much here to unpack, sorry,” and refuse to answer the question. But if you do it in person, like verbally read out the same paragraph you wrote, he can understand and answer it. There’s other things, too. He can type out simple sentences, but has a very poor grasp of spelling, frequently getting very simple words wrong (think different versions of there, their, and they’re). It’s genuinely baffling how he got to that point, but he also hasn’t ever really published material and it kinda makes sense why. Dude has a doctorate in a STEM field and I think the reason for that is that he can understand mathematics, but literally can’t understand complex writing. Any idea that takes more than a single sentence to explicate just evaporates out of his head.

      • breakfastburrito@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve never seen anything as extreme as you describe, but when I took the GRE I met a guy kind of like this. After you finish the exam it gives you an estimate of your score, but your real scores are sent to you weeks later. On the way out some guy asked me how I did (fairly well but not 97% plus on anything). He was like “oh damn if you don’t get above 95% on math then you can’t go to grad school in STEM lol”. I asked him what he got in the reading and writing and he said <33% “but that isn’t important for grad school” lmao

    • FiftyShadesOfMyCow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Very interesting read! I’m from Germany and taught myself English. I’m currently at a C1/B2 level (it’s a European standard I think?) and consider myself good enough to move through English speaking countries independently just fine.

      I’m basically studying English every day by reading and watching YouTube exclusively in English. Love it!

      It’s a shame that many people don’t bother honing their language skills.

      • griffen62@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s really impressive, I do wish I took learning another language more seriously when I was younger. Everyonce Ina while I try to dig back into it but lose motivation for one reason or another.

        What did you find to be the most helpful starting out?

  • mochi@lemdit.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Probably a combination of flat out retards and recent immigrants for whom English is a second language.

  • amaryllisunicorn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    As a school psychologist who completes academic assessments when identifying students with learning disabilities, COVID skyrocketed these numbers. There’s just not a lot of motivation for kids anymore. The future is here and is making our population slowly illiterate.

    • BromSwolligans@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That ‘motivation’ bit is so important. Former educator, currently still working in education, and I’m always wary of anything that makes a sweeping statement about ‘the kids’ not being ‘all right’. But there are important, substantial contributors to undesirable outcomes that need to be acknowledged. Poverty being one, as well as the cycle of poverty and abuse which is deeply tied to white flight and de-industrialization (which we might collectively assign to the death of the American dream if we aren’t too concerned with being precious about the the notion of patriotism).

      Saying ‘iPads’ or ‘TikTok’ is the culprit doesn’t help anyone. But iPads and TikTok are contributing factors because they both exacerbate the feeling that being entertained is enough to scrape one’s way through life at the bottom of the barrel of expectations…as well as over-informing young people (and adults) that there is positively nothing left to look forward to. Industry is collapsing, housing and transportation are unaffordable, everything you once expected to purchase (and let’s not get lost talking about purchasing as a metric for determining whether one is living a good life) has now moved to an ever-bleeding subscription model; inflation is compounded by corporate greed (and maybe we should talk about how the business incentive of endless growth contributes to every other problem) and corporate greed (something no one but the executives and their shareholders can influence, let alone control) is raping all the natural splendor, wealth and even health and stability of the very ground we walk on and air we breathe.

      Why the fuck wouldn’t some young person whose future job prospects (which were shit to begin with) are being devoured by AI, just turn toward the boundless font of readily accessible entertainment rather than going uphill toward seemingly fruitless self improvement? Why would they bother to rise to the level of literacy that allows them to appreciate a 19th century classic translated from the original Russian, or to parse the dense theming of some modern masterpiece? What’s the reward, to someone whose entire life to this point has been flavored with instant gratification? To them it’s all just ‘content’, and there’s plenty of content more accessible than literature. Art may mean nothing for many reasons, not least of which is it can be falsified to a level of acceptability (AI songs by dead artists, for example).

      It’s a Twilight Zone, Black Mirror, Brave New World living nightmare. But what is the alternative? What systems or entities or organizations are coming to save the day? There are none. This moment is a gruesome forbidden experiment: it is a post-Reaganite, neoliberal race to the cultural bottom, and the youngest generation are the lab rats.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The weird part is because a lot of people don’t know what illiterate means…

      They think these people can’t read a fast food menu and words just look like chicken scratch.

      • Hangglide@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The definition of illiterate is “unable to read or write.”

        That pretty much sounds like what you just said. What do you think it means?

        There isn’t much nuance in the definition.

        • BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Illiteracy in developed countries usually refers to functional illiteracy, not a complete unfamiliarity with letters and words.

          Functional illiteracy means your ability to read and write is insufficient for you to function effectively in society. Functionally illiterate people may be able to read to some limited extent, but might read too poorly or slowly to process the types of written information they encounter on a day-to-day basis. These people would not be able to understand forms at the doctor’s office, the instructions on their taxes, the terms of credit card agreements, the contents of important mail, and other material that might be important for them to understand.

  • tegs_terry@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because you have a deleterious government that has purposefully de-prioritised education in order to command greater control over a brainwashed population.

    • PilferJynx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Americans seem especially averse to paying taxes. Makes sense when you see where those taxes usually go (not education)

  • PhoenxBlue@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The powers that be want to eliminate schools all together. They don’t need a literate labourer. Soldier just need to recognize the alphabet. (I mean this in the most basic of terms. I’m not desparaging anyone.)

    They don’t want “free thinking” people in their society. If anyone remembers ‘Divergent’. If not, look into it. It’s not too far off.

  • Curious Canid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This disaster did not come about by accident. The whole country has allowed our public schools to decline, but the conservatives have been actively working to destroy them since the 80’s. They have been leveraging racism, fundamentalism, and other prejudice-based fears to undermine the curriculum. Meanwhile, they have cut school funding, made teaching a terrible job, and downplayed the value of formal education. Educated people are much harder to manipulate. A minority trying to hold onto power needs a public that is poorly educated and without critical thinking skills.

  • marionberrycore@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    One small part of the problem I only learned about recently is the Whole Language approach to teaching reading. Basically teaching kids to guess what words make sense instead of actually teaching them how to read. It was popularized in the 80s and 90s but continued to be used in some parts of the US into the 2010s. An entire chunk of the US population (and a few other countries as well) was literally not taught phonics/sounding it out because their teachers or schools followed this ineffective alternative method.

    Of course that’s far from the only factor, but it’s one many aren’t aware of.

    • amigan@lemmy.dynatron.me
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This scares the crap out of me. My daughter’s mother and I both went to the same preschool, where phonics was drilled into our heads from age three. Our 4-year-old daughter is now learning how to read, and she is not learning phonics. We are taking upon ourselves to make sure that she is exposed to phonics as much as possible this summer before school tries to hopelessly mangle her reading skills. I’ve already noticed her pointing out text and saying what they say, but it’s obvious she just looked at context clues like a picture to figure it out and didn’t actually read it.

  • scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Part of the reason so many can’t read above a 6th grade level is that they are always written to on that level. Anything written for any commercial purpose is always written at a low level so any idiot can understand the menu / read the packaging / consume the magazine ad / whatever. Commercial writers write for the lowest common denominator and to an extent, news media do as well.

    So a 6th grade reading level is really all you need to get by. Unless you actually read books or opt for The Economist or something else that doesn’t assume you’re a moron, 6th grade level is all you’re gonna see.

    There’s some utility in this. Simpler language is also lowest-common denominator for second-language-speakers, of which we have many. Another reason to use it.

    • Thugosaurus_Rex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s also important to note that a low reading grade level for writing is not “bad writing.” Most novels fall somewhere between 5th and 7th grade reading levels. Stephen King is typically around 6th grade, and Jane Austin was often at about 5th grade, for examples. There are plenty of writers who convey complex stories and themes at even lower grade levels, and it’s not unheard of to read a complex story at even a 4th or 3rd grade level. In many contexts a low grade level does not mean the content is simple or dumbed down–it’s just a measurement of the conveyance or style of the writing.

  • Magister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Same everywhere. I think 53% of people in Quebec are functional illiterate. There is an article today about French students being illiterates too.

    The educational system wants this. I start to think it’s by design.

    • TooSoon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      As in they’re literate in English but the government decided to stop offering services in English thereby making citizens functionally illiterate?

      • benvoyon@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The same applies in the ROC (Rest of canada) when dealing with their French minority. Latest example is in New-Brunswick where the premier faces an onslaught by eliminating the French as a second language programme.

        Alberta done that in the 1920’s without recriminations by closing down French only schools.

        Ontario is not better underfunding French services.

          • benvoyon@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m a frog, kiss me. Bill 96 is excellent as tabled . I don’t need to wait. If you’re not happy with it, do like me and GTFO . You are ROC material to light up the culture war. Join them and you will feel more at home. You must be too illiterate to be able to read between the line or fucking blind.

            • benvoyon@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m a frog, kiss me. Bill 96 is excellent as tabled . I don’t need to wait. If you’re not happy with it, do like me and GTFO. You are ROC material to light up the culture war. Join them and you will feel more at home. You must be too illiterate to be able to read between the line or fucking blind.

            • TooSoon@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m sorry I genuinely could not follow most of that word salad. Care to try again, preferably in English this time?

              • benvoyon@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Speak White, you say. Hmm… … bigot! That is why we will never cross the cultural divide between the two solitudes in canada if on either side we refuse to acknowledge our differences.

                • TooSoon@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Feel free to speak in whatever ethnicity you want so long as type out a full sentence with at least a hint of what your point is trying to be.

                  The problem with your last comment isn’t slang words or grammar, it was a complete lack of logical flow and endless run-on sentences with no point to be found anywhere.

  • TheGoldenGod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    My girlfriend is a math teacher, the number of middle schoolers that can’t do basic multiplication before is surprisingly high. Yet the schools keep passing the kids. I remember learning multiplication as a 4th grader, if I hadn’t, I would’ve never passed.

    • Zerlyna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      My niece from Florida came to live with me in December, just finished fifth grade and I was stunned that she doesn’t know her multiplication tables. My kids In Pennsylvania learned them in 3rd grade a few years ago.

      • yaaaaayPancakes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Does she understand the concept of multiplication though? That’s ultimately the important part.

        Learning rote things like multiplication tables seems kinda silly in a world where Google can just do the math for you. But the important thing is to be able to recognize when multiplication is useful.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          There are still plenty of instances where doing arithmetic quickly in your head is useful (figuring out a tip at the cash register, for example) that memorizing it can have advantages.